Loading…

An Experimental Study of GPR Near-Field Problem in Depth Ranging of Buried Objects

We evaluate the often neglected ranging (or cover depth) error of an object located within the Fresnel Region (or called radiating near-field) and reactive near-field region in ground penetrating radar (GPR). The experiments were conducted in concrete specimens with various rebar cover depths from 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in civil engineering 2023-10, Vol.2023, p.1-9
Main Authors: Cham, Rex Yui Kei, Lai, Wallace Wai Lok
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluate the often neglected ranging (or cover depth) error of an object located within the Fresnel Region (or called radiating near-field) and reactive near-field region in ground penetrating radar (GPR). The experiments were conducted in concrete specimens with various rebar cover depths from 10 to 80 mm, which imitates any object imaged by GPR from reactive near-field, Fresnel region to far-field region. Velocities of each individual data point of the hyperbolic reflections of the embedded reinforcement in radargram are calculated by developed algorithms based on common offset antenna and multiple trilaterated ray paths. Two different velocity algorithms, based on semi- and full-trilaterated ray paths, were applied to estimate the wave travelling velocity as a prerequisite of cover depth measurement. The algorithms were firstly validated using a high-frequency 2-GHz antenna to verify the travelling speed of radar waves in air, which is equal to the speed of light. Then, the same antenna was used to estimate the cover depth by measuring the time of flight and velocity based on the two velocity algorithms. The results reveal that the ranging accuracy is highly in doubt in reactive near-field and Fresnel regions but is largely improved when the object locates in far-field region where GPR wave propagation becomes plane-type. The measurements, riding on accurate modelling of ray-path’s trilateration models, provide evidence that the normal linear scale of GPR time-to-depth conversion overlooks the effects of near-field/Fresnel region. We therefore suggest that the GPR near-field/Fresnel region and far-field boundary must be taken into account before any attempt of time-to-depth conversion and depth estimation of objects by GPR are carried out.
ISSN:1687-8086
1687-8094
DOI:10.1155/2023/6865847