Loading…

The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners

Emotional Intelligence (EI) emerged in the 1990s as an ability based construct analogous to general Intelligence. However, over the past 3 decades two further, conceptually distinct forms of EI have emerged (often termed "trait EI" and "mixed model EI") along with a large number...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2019-05, Vol.10, p.1116-1116
Main Authors: O'Connor, Peter J, Hill, Andrew, Kaya, Maria, Martin, Brett
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503
container_end_page 1116
container_issue
container_start_page 1116
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 10
creator O'Connor, Peter J
Hill, Andrew
Kaya, Maria
Martin, Brett
description Emotional Intelligence (EI) emerged in the 1990s as an ability based construct analogous to general Intelligence. However, over the past 3 decades two further, conceptually distinct forms of EI have emerged (often termed "trait EI" and "mixed model EI") along with a large number of psychometric tools designed to measure these forms. Currently more than 30 different widely-used measures of EI have been developed. Although there is some clarity within the EI field regarding the types of EI and their respective measures, those external to the field are faced with a seemingly complex EI literature, overlapping terminology, and multiple published measures. In this paper we seek to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners seeking to utilize EI in their work. We first provide an overview of the different conceptualizations of EI. We then provide a set of recommendations for practitioners and researchers regarding the most appropriate measures of EI for a range of different purposes. We provide guidance both on how to select and use different measures of EI. We conclude with a comprehensive review of the major measures of EI in terms of factor structure, reliability, and validity.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01116
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0bef9bc95cef4d1bbedf78c6ac48283b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0bef9bc95cef4d1bbedf78c6ac48283b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2340039252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkk1vEzEQhi1ERau2d05oj1wS_LHr2ByQqqhApCCqqpwtf4wTV7vrYDtFvfPD8Salan2xNe_MM_b4Reg9wXPGhPzkd_lxM6eYyDkmhPA36Ixw3s4IXoi3L86n6DLne1xXiynG9B06ZYRIwgQ7Q3_vttD8AJ33CQYYSxN9cz3EEuKo-2Y1Fuj7sIHRwufmqlmmUIKtwi08BPgzJZdavw4Fki4V0ejRVdHGocKcnjC58THVWAad7BZSPuTcJG1LmPQauUAnXvcZLp_2c_Tr6_Xd8vts_fPbanm1ntmW0zITzDlPpTSaWGHEgnAjwXmLJWmZ9tZY14EwhnFBJXhOiVx44xwn2BrdYXaOVkeui_pe7VIYdHpUUQd1CMS0UTrVB_agsAEvjZWdBd86YkxttBCWa9sKKpiprC9H1m5vBnC2zi7p_hX0tTKGrdrEB8W7lktKKuDjEyDF33vIRQ0h2zpuPULcZ0VZizGTtKM1FR9TbYo5J_DPbQhWkxfUwQtq8oI6eKGWfHh5veeC_z_P_gERF7WL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2340039252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners</title><source>PubMed</source><creator>O'Connor, Peter J ; Hill, Andrew ; Kaya, Maria ; Martin, Brett</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Peter J ; Hill, Andrew ; Kaya, Maria ; Martin, Brett</creatorcontrib><description>Emotional Intelligence (EI) emerged in the 1990s as an ability based construct analogous to general Intelligence. However, over the past 3 decades two further, conceptually distinct forms of EI have emerged (often termed "trait EI" and "mixed model EI") along with a large number of psychometric tools designed to measure these forms. Currently more than 30 different widely-used measures of EI have been developed. Although there is some clarity within the EI field regarding the types of EI and their respective measures, those external to the field are faced with a seemingly complex EI literature, overlapping terminology, and multiple published measures. In this paper we seek to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners seeking to utilize EI in their work. We first provide an overview of the different conceptualizations of EI. We then provide a set of recommendations for practitioners and researchers regarding the most appropriate measures of EI for a range of different purposes. We provide guidance both on how to select and use different measures of EI. We conclude with a comprehensive review of the major measures of EI in terms of factor structure, reliability, and validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31191383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>ability ; emotional intelligence ; measures ; Psychology ; questionnaires ; trait</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2019-05, Vol.10, p.1116-1116</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 O'Connor, Hill, Kaya and Martin. 2019 O'Connor, Hill, Kaya and Martin</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546921/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546921/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Brett</creatorcontrib><title>The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Emotional Intelligence (EI) emerged in the 1990s as an ability based construct analogous to general Intelligence. However, over the past 3 decades two further, conceptually distinct forms of EI have emerged (often termed "trait EI" and "mixed model EI") along with a large number of psychometric tools designed to measure these forms. Currently more than 30 different widely-used measures of EI have been developed. Although there is some clarity within the EI field regarding the types of EI and their respective measures, those external to the field are faced with a seemingly complex EI literature, overlapping terminology, and multiple published measures. In this paper we seek to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners seeking to utilize EI in their work. We first provide an overview of the different conceptualizations of EI. We then provide a set of recommendations for practitioners and researchers regarding the most appropriate measures of EI for a range of different purposes. We provide guidance both on how to select and use different measures of EI. We conclude with a comprehensive review of the major measures of EI in terms of factor structure, reliability, and validity.</description><subject>ability</subject><subject>emotional intelligence</subject><subject>measures</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>questionnaires</subject><subject>trait</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkk1vEzEQhi1ERau2d05oj1wS_LHr2ByQqqhApCCqqpwtf4wTV7vrYDtFvfPD8Salan2xNe_MM_b4Reg9wXPGhPzkd_lxM6eYyDkmhPA36Ixw3s4IXoi3L86n6DLne1xXiynG9B06ZYRIwgQ7Q3_vttD8AJ33CQYYSxN9cz3EEuKo-2Y1Fuj7sIHRwufmqlmmUIKtwi08BPgzJZdavw4Fki4V0ejRVdHGocKcnjC58THVWAad7BZSPuTcJG1LmPQauUAnXvcZLp_2c_Tr6_Xd8vts_fPbanm1ntmW0zITzDlPpTSaWGHEgnAjwXmLJWmZ9tZY14EwhnFBJXhOiVx44xwn2BrdYXaOVkeui_pe7VIYdHpUUQd1CMS0UTrVB_agsAEvjZWdBd86YkxttBCWa9sKKpiprC9H1m5vBnC2zi7p_hX0tTKGrdrEB8W7lktKKuDjEyDF33vIRQ0h2zpuPULcZ0VZizGTtKM1FR9TbYo5J_DPbQhWkxfUwQtq8oI6eKGWfHh5veeC_z_P_gERF7WL</recordid><startdate>20190528</startdate><enddate>20190528</enddate><creator>O'Connor, Peter J</creator><creator>Hill, Andrew</creator><creator>Kaya, Maria</creator><creator>Martin, Brett</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190528</creationdate><title>The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners</title><author>O'Connor, Peter J ; Hill, Andrew ; Kaya, Maria ; Martin, Brett</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>ability</topic><topic>emotional intelligence</topic><topic>measures</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>trait</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Brett</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Connor, Peter J</au><au>Hill, Andrew</au><au>Kaya, Maria</au><au>Martin, Brett</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-05-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>1116</spage><epage>1116</epage><pages>1116-1116</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Emotional Intelligence (EI) emerged in the 1990s as an ability based construct analogous to general Intelligence. However, over the past 3 decades two further, conceptually distinct forms of EI have emerged (often termed "trait EI" and "mixed model EI") along with a large number of psychometric tools designed to measure these forms. Currently more than 30 different widely-used measures of EI have been developed. Although there is some clarity within the EI field regarding the types of EI and their respective measures, those external to the field are faced with a seemingly complex EI literature, overlapping terminology, and multiple published measures. In this paper we seek to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners seeking to utilize EI in their work. We first provide an overview of the different conceptualizations of EI. We then provide a set of recommendations for practitioners and researchers regarding the most appropriate measures of EI for a range of different purposes. We provide guidance both on how to select and use different measures of EI. We conclude with a comprehensive review of the major measures of EI in terms of factor structure, reliability, and validity.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>31191383</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01116</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2019-05, Vol.10, p.1116-1116
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0bef9bc95cef4d1bbedf78c6ac48283b
source PubMed
subjects ability
emotional intelligence
measures
Psychology
questionnaires
trait
title The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Measurement%20of%20Emotional%20Intelligence:%20A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Researchers%20and%20Practitioners&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=O'Connor,%20Peter%20J&rft.date=2019-05-28&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=1116&rft.epage=1116&rft.pages=1116-1116&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2340039252%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-83ddf299ba1c8b8716b9edfc09143afcbcd5e8bb36829ef62197fbdd610cba503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2340039252&rft_id=info:pmid/31191383&rfr_iscdi=true