Loading…

Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms

The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emerg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE access 2022, Vol.10, p.55782-55793
Main Authors: Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan, Nordin, Rosdiadee, Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah, Alobaidy, Haider A. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3
container_end_page 55793
container_issue
container_start_page 55782
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 10
creator Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan
Nordin, Rosdiadee
Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah
Alobaidy, Haider A. H.
description The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of RMSE and R^{2} , followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0cc0aa8356b94a009ffee8a139ba7801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9779262</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0cc0aa8356b94a009ffee8a139ba7801</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2672088520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctOwzAQtBBIoMIXcInEucWP-nUsES-pPEThbG3cTXEpcXHSIv4elyDEXjwe7cyONIScMjpijNrzSVlezmYjTjkfCaaVYnaPHHGm7FBIofb_4UNy0rZLmsdkSuoj8nQXq7DC4h67z5jeijJuMcECi8eE8-C7EJviAlqcFxnMNmtM27D73YF_DQ0WU4TUhGZRTFaLmEL3-t4ek4MaVi2e_L4D8nJ1-VzeDKcP17flZDr0QphuCMxUyMa-4lT4SliWsZQyU-g1s8ZXIIQXXCuT89ZMjdFQMMzXXmo5r8SA3Pa-8whLt07hHdKXixDcDxHTwkHqgl-ho95TACOkquwYKLV1jWiACVuBNpRlr7Pea53ixwbbzi3jJjU5vuNKc2qMzDEHRPRbPsW2TVj_XWXU7bpwfRdu14X77SKrTntVQMQ_hdXacsXFN0j2hGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672088520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</title><source>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</source><creator>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan ; Nordin, Rosdiadee ; Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah ; Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan ; Nordin, Rosdiadee ; Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah ; Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">RMSE </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R^{2} </tex-math></inline-formula>, followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>5G mobile communication ; Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Computational modeling ; COVID-19 ; Digitization ; Frequencies ; Gaussian process ; Kernel functions ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; MATLAB ; Network analysis ; Optimization ; Planning ; Prediction models ; Predictive models ; Radio frequency ; received signal strength indicator ; Reference signals ; Regression analysis ; Signal strength ; Support vector machines ; wireless communication</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2022, Vol.10, p.55782-55793</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4461-3039 ; 0000-0001-9254-2023 ; 0000-0003-4808-1877 ; 0000-0002-6593-5603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9779262$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27614,27904,27905,27906,54914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordin, Rosdiadee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">RMSE </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R^{2} </tex-math></inline-formula>, followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.]]></description><subject>5G mobile communication</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Frequencies</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Kernel functions</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MATLAB</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>received signal strength indicator</subject><subject>Reference signals</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Signal strength</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>wireless communication</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctOwzAQtBBIoMIXcInEucWP-nUsES-pPEThbG3cTXEpcXHSIv4elyDEXjwe7cyONIScMjpijNrzSVlezmYjTjkfCaaVYnaPHHGm7FBIofb_4UNy0rZLmsdkSuoj8nQXq7DC4h67z5jeijJuMcECi8eE8-C7EJviAlqcFxnMNmtM27D73YF_DQ0WU4TUhGZRTFaLmEL3-t4ek4MaVi2e_L4D8nJ1-VzeDKcP17flZDr0QphuCMxUyMa-4lT4SliWsZQyU-g1s8ZXIIQXXCuT89ZMjdFQMMzXXmo5r8SA3Pa-8whLt07hHdKXixDcDxHTwkHqgl-ho95TACOkquwYKLV1jWiACVuBNpRlr7Pea53ixwbbzi3jJjU5vuNKc2qMzDEHRPRbPsW2TVj_XWXU7bpwfRdu14X77SKrTntVQMQ_hdXacsXFN0j2hGc</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</creator><creator>Nordin, Rosdiadee</creator><creator>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</creator><creator>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-3039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-2023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-1877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-5603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</title><author>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan ; Nordin, Rosdiadee ; Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah ; Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>5G mobile communication</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Frequencies</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Kernel functions</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MATLAB</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>received signal strength indicator</topic><topic>Reference signals</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Signal strength</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>wireless communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordin, Rosdiadee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</au><au>Nordin, Rosdiadee</au><au>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</au><au>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>55782</spage><epage>55793</epage><pages>55782-55793</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">RMSE </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R^{2} </tex-math></inline-formula>, followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.]]></abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-3039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-2023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-1877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-5603</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2022, Vol.10, p.55782-55793
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0cc0aa8356b94a009ffee8a139ba7801
source IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals
subjects 5G mobile communication
Accuracy
Algorithms
Artificial neural networks
Computational modeling
COVID-19
Digitization
Frequencies
Gaussian process
Kernel functions
Machine learning
Mathematical models
MATLAB
Network analysis
Optimization
Planning
Prediction models
Predictive models
Radio frequency
received signal strength indicator
Reference signals
Regression analysis
Signal strength
Support vector machines
wireless communication
title Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mobile%20Network%20Coverage%20Prediction%20Based%20on%20Supervised%20Machine%20Learning%20Algorithms&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Ahmad%20Fauzi,%20Mohd%20Fazuwan&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=55782&rft.epage=55793&rft.pages=55782-55793&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2672088520%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672088520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9779262&rfr_iscdi=true