Loading…
Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms
The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emerg...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE access 2022, Vol.10, p.55782-55793 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3 |
container_end_page | 55793 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 55782 |
container_title | IEEE access |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan Nordin, Rosdiadee Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah Alobaidy, Haider A. H. |
description | The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of RMSE and R^{2} , followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0cc0aa8356b94a009ffee8a139ba7801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9779262</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0cc0aa8356b94a009ffee8a139ba7801</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2672088520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctOwzAQtBBIoMIXcInEucWP-nUsES-pPEThbG3cTXEpcXHSIv4elyDEXjwe7cyONIScMjpijNrzSVlezmYjTjkfCaaVYnaPHHGm7FBIofb_4UNy0rZLmsdkSuoj8nQXq7DC4h67z5jeijJuMcECi8eE8-C7EJviAlqcFxnMNmtM27D73YF_DQ0WU4TUhGZRTFaLmEL3-t4ek4MaVi2e_L4D8nJ1-VzeDKcP17flZDr0QphuCMxUyMa-4lT4SliWsZQyU-g1s8ZXIIQXXCuT89ZMjdFQMMzXXmo5r8SA3Pa-8whLt07hHdKXixDcDxHTwkHqgl-ho95TACOkquwYKLV1jWiACVuBNpRlr7Pea53ixwbbzi3jJjU5vuNKc2qMzDEHRPRbPsW2TVj_XWXU7bpwfRdu14X77SKrTntVQMQ_hdXacsXFN0j2hGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672088520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</title><source>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</source><creator>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan ; Nordin, Rosdiadee ; Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah ; Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan ; Nordin, Rosdiadee ; Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah ; Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">RMSE </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R^{2} </tex-math></inline-formula>, followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>5G mobile communication ; Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Computational modeling ; COVID-19 ; Digitization ; Frequencies ; Gaussian process ; Kernel functions ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; MATLAB ; Network analysis ; Optimization ; Planning ; Prediction models ; Predictive models ; Radio frequency ; received signal strength indicator ; Reference signals ; Regression analysis ; Signal strength ; Support vector machines ; wireless communication</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2022, Vol.10, p.55782-55793</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4461-3039 ; 0000-0001-9254-2023 ; 0000-0003-4808-1877 ; 0000-0002-6593-5603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9779262$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27614,27904,27905,27906,54914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordin, Rosdiadee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">RMSE </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R^{2} </tex-math></inline-formula>, followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.]]></description><subject>5G mobile communication</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Frequencies</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Kernel functions</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MATLAB</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>received signal strength indicator</subject><subject>Reference signals</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Signal strength</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>wireless communication</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctOwzAQtBBIoMIXcInEucWP-nUsES-pPEThbG3cTXEpcXHSIv4elyDEXjwe7cyONIScMjpijNrzSVlezmYjTjkfCaaVYnaPHHGm7FBIofb_4UNy0rZLmsdkSuoj8nQXq7DC4h67z5jeijJuMcECi8eE8-C7EJviAlqcFxnMNmtM27D73YF_DQ0WU4TUhGZRTFaLmEL3-t4ek4MaVi2e_L4D8nJ1-VzeDKcP17flZDr0QphuCMxUyMa-4lT4SliWsZQyU-g1s8ZXIIQXXCuT89ZMjdFQMMzXXmo5r8SA3Pa-8whLt07hHdKXixDcDxHTwkHqgl-ho95TACOkquwYKLV1jWiACVuBNpRlr7Pea53ixwbbzi3jJjU5vuNKc2qMzDEHRPRbPsW2TVj_XWXU7bpwfRdu14X77SKrTntVQMQ_hdXacsXFN0j2hGc</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</creator><creator>Nordin, Rosdiadee</creator><creator>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</creator><creator>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-3039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-2023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-1877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-5603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</title><author>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan ; Nordin, Rosdiadee ; Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah ; Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>5G mobile communication</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Frequencies</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Kernel functions</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MATLAB</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>received signal strength indicator</topic><topic>Reference signals</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Signal strength</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>wireless communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordin, Rosdiadee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmad Fauzi, Mohd Fazuwan</au><au>Nordin, Rosdiadee</au><au>Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah</au><au>Alobaidy, Haider A. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>55782</spage><epage>55793</epage><pages>55782-55793</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The need for wider coverage and high-performance quality of mobile networks is critical due to the maturity of Internet penetration in today's society. One of the primary drivers of this demand is the dramatic shift toward digitalization due to the Covid-19 pandemic impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the 5G wireless standard and the increasingly complex actual operating environment of mobile networks make the traditional prediction model less reliable. With the recent advancements and promising capabilities of machine learning (ML), it is seen as an alternative to the traditional approaches for ground to ground (G2G) mobile communication coverage prediction. In this study, various ML models have been tested and evaluated to develop an ML-based received signal strength prediction model for mobile networks. However, the challenge is to identify a practical ML model that can fulfill the computing speed criteria while still meeting the prediction accuracy. A total of six categories of ML models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Trees (RT), Ensembles of Trees (ET), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) that consists of more than 20 types of established algorithms/kernels have been tested and evaluated in this paper to identify the best contender among them, in terms of speed and accuracy. Findings from the evaluation showed that the GPR model is the most accurate model for Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) prediction in terms of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">RMSE </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R^{2} </tex-math></inline-formula>, followed by ET, RT, SVM, ANN and LR. Nevertheless, prediction speed and model training times are also important factors in determining the most practical model for RSRP prediction for several real-world mobile network planning applications. Finally, the ET model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm has been selected and highly recommended as the most practically employed ML model for developing rigorous RSRP predictions model in multi-frequency bands and multi-environment. The developed prediction model is capable of being utilized for the network analysis and optimization.]]></abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-3039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-2023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-1877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-5603</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-3536 |
ispartof | IEEE access, 2022, Vol.10, p.55782-55793 |
issn | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0cc0aa8356b94a009ffee8a139ba7801 |
source | IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals |
subjects | 5G mobile communication Accuracy Algorithms Artificial neural networks Computational modeling COVID-19 Digitization Frequencies Gaussian process Kernel functions Machine learning Mathematical models MATLAB Network analysis Optimization Planning Prediction models Predictive models Radio frequency received signal strength indicator Reference signals Regression analysis Signal strength Support vector machines wireless communication |
title | Mobile Network Coverage Prediction Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mobile%20Network%20Coverage%20Prediction%20Based%20on%20Supervised%20Machine%20Learning%20Algorithms&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Ahmad%20Fauzi,%20Mohd%20Fazuwan&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=55782&rft.epage=55793&rft.pages=55782-55793&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176619&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2672088520%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a18be14cb203cb39114c555e14ec7198cba33c32768000f164e80a81cfc575db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672088520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9779262&rfr_iscdi=true |