Loading…

In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health

While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microorganisms (Basel) 2022-01, Vol.10 (2), p.214
Main Authors: Happel, Anna-Ursula, Kullin, Brian R, Gamieldien, Hoyam, Jaspan, Heather B, Varsani, Arvind, Martin, Darren, Passmore, Jo-Ann S, Froissart, Rémy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 214
container_title Microorganisms (Basel)
container_volume 10
creator Happel, Anna-Ursula
Kullin, Brian R
Gamieldien, Hoyam
Jaspan, Heather B
Varsani, Arvind
Martin, Darren
Passmore, Jo-Ann S
Froissart, Rémy
description While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prophet and Virsorter. Prophages were identified according to stringent (detected by ≥4 methods) or lenient criteria (detected by ≥2 methods), both with >80% reciprocal sequence overlap. The stringent approach identified 448 prophages within 359 genomes, with 40.1% genomes harbouring at least one prophage, while the lenient approach identified 1671 prophages within 83.7% of the genomes. To confirm our in silico estimates in vitro, we tested for inducible prophages in 57 vaginally-derived and commercial isolates and found inducible prophages in 61.4% of the isolates. We characterised the in silico predicted prophages based on weighted gene repertoire relatedness and found that most belonged to the or families. ResFam and eggNOG identified four potential antimicrobial resistance genes within the predicted prophages. Our results suggest that while prophages seldomly carry clinically concerning genes and thus unlikely a pose a direct risk to human vaginal microbiomes, their high prevalence warrants the characterisation of prophages in live biotherapeutics.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/microorganisms10020214
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0cd4eb6e0f674335859591fb1936365e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0cd4eb6e0f674335859591fb1936365e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2633858893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1rGzEQhpfS0oQ0fyEIemkPTvWx0kqXQjBtbTA00KZXodWHV2a9cqVdQ_99x90kJKG6aJh55tXMaKrqiuBrxhT-tI82p5S3ZohlXwjGFFNSv6rOKW7EggrcvH5in1WXpewwHEWY5ORtdcY4xVIIdV7t1gP6EftoE1p2Jhs7-hyLGWMaUArodhrBPnp0m9OhM1tfUBzQBrDUGhv73lhvPLor3p0CQLUxjdEWFFJGv8w2DqZHK2_6sXtXvQmmL_7y_r6o7r5--blcLTbfv62XN5uF5TUdF5ZwxTgjLeWEGoJdcJJbR4SXmNauoS7UtYC4kMZx1uIgCW5pG0gNvuDYRbWedV0yO33IcW_yH51M1P8cMDdtMtTYe42tq30rPA6iqRnjkiuuSGiJYoIJ7kHr86x1mNq9d9YPYzb9M9HnkSF2epuOWspGESJA4OMs0L1IW91s9MmHoVdFG34kwH64fyyn35Mvo97HYj0MefBpKpoKBv8npWKAvn-B7tKUYdYzhWlDGwmUmClYl1KyD48VEKxPm6T_v0mQePW07ce0h71hfwF85Mfq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633027278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Happel, Anna-Ursula ; Kullin, Brian R ; Gamieldien, Hoyam ; Jaspan, Heather B ; Varsani, Arvind ; Martin, Darren ; Passmore, Jo-Ann S ; Froissart, Rémy</creator><creatorcontrib>Happel, Anna-Ursula ; Kullin, Brian R ; Gamieldien, Hoyam ; Jaspan, Heather B ; Varsani, Arvind ; Martin, Darren ; Passmore, Jo-Ann S ; Froissart, Rémy</creatorcontrib><description>While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prophet and Virsorter. Prophages were identified according to stringent (detected by ≥4 methods) or lenient criteria (detected by ≥2 methods), both with &gt;80% reciprocal sequence overlap. The stringent approach identified 448 prophages within 359 genomes, with 40.1% genomes harbouring at least one prophage, while the lenient approach identified 1671 prophages within 83.7% of the genomes. To confirm our in silico estimates in vitro, we tested for inducible prophages in 57 vaginally-derived and commercial isolates and found inducible prophages in 61.4% of the isolates. We characterised the in silico predicted prophages based on weighted gene repertoire relatedness and found that most belonged to the or families. ResFam and eggNOG identified four potential antimicrobial resistance genes within the predicted prophages. Our results suggest that while prophages seldomly carry clinically concerning genes and thus unlikely a pose a direct risk to human vaginal microbiomes, their high prevalence warrants the characterisation of prophages in live biotherapeutics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10020214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35208669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; antibiotic resistant genes ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Bacteria ; Bacteriology ; bacteriophages ; Datasets ; Genes ; genital ; Genomes ; Gynecology and obstetrics ; Human health and pathology ; Infectious diseases ; Lactobacillaceae ; Life Sciences ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Probiotics ; Prophages ; Proteins ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Vagina ; Virulence ; virulence factor</subject><ispartof>Microorganisms (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.10 (2), p.214</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8234-1308 ; 0000-0002-0745-6073 ; 0000-0003-3658-8638 ; 0000-0003-4111-2415</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2633027278/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2633027278?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03539275$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Happel, Anna-Ursula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kullin, Brian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamieldien, Hoyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaspan, Heather B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varsani, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passmore, Jo-Ann S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froissart, Rémy</creatorcontrib><title>In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health</title><title>Microorganisms (Basel)</title><addtitle>Microorganisms</addtitle><description>While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prophet and Virsorter. Prophages were identified according to stringent (detected by ≥4 methods) or lenient criteria (detected by ≥2 methods), both with &gt;80% reciprocal sequence overlap. The stringent approach identified 448 prophages within 359 genomes, with 40.1% genomes harbouring at least one prophage, while the lenient approach identified 1671 prophages within 83.7% of the genomes. To confirm our in silico estimates in vitro, we tested for inducible prophages in 57 vaginally-derived and commercial isolates and found inducible prophages in 61.4% of the isolates. We characterised the in silico predicted prophages based on weighted gene repertoire relatedness and found that most belonged to the or families. ResFam and eggNOG identified four potential antimicrobial resistance genes within the predicted prophages. Our results suggest that while prophages seldomly carry clinically concerning genes and thus unlikely a pose a direct risk to human vaginal microbiomes, their high prevalence warrants the characterisation of prophages in live biotherapeutics.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>antibiotic resistant genes</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>bacteriophages</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>genital</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Gynecology and obstetrics</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Lactobacillaceae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Prophages</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><subject>virulence factor</subject><issn>2076-2607</issn><issn>2076-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1rGzEQhpfS0oQ0fyEIemkPTvWx0kqXQjBtbTA00KZXodWHV2a9cqVdQ_99x90kJKG6aJh55tXMaKrqiuBrxhT-tI82p5S3ZohlXwjGFFNSv6rOKW7EggrcvH5in1WXpewwHEWY5ORtdcY4xVIIdV7t1gP6EftoE1p2Jhs7-hyLGWMaUArodhrBPnp0m9OhM1tfUBzQBrDUGhv73lhvPLor3p0CQLUxjdEWFFJGv8w2DqZHK2_6sXtXvQmmL_7y_r6o7r5--blcLTbfv62XN5uF5TUdF5ZwxTgjLeWEGoJdcJJbR4SXmNauoS7UtYC4kMZx1uIgCW5pG0gNvuDYRbWedV0yO33IcW_yH51M1P8cMDdtMtTYe42tq30rPA6iqRnjkiuuSGiJYoIJ7kHr86x1mNq9d9YPYzb9M9HnkSF2epuOWspGESJA4OMs0L1IW91s9MmHoVdFG34kwH64fyyn35Mvo97HYj0MefBpKpoKBv8npWKAvn-B7tKUYdYzhWlDGwmUmClYl1KyD48VEKxPm6T_v0mQePW07ce0h71hfwF85Mfq</recordid><startdate>20220120</startdate><enddate>20220120</enddate><creator>Happel, Anna-Ursula</creator><creator>Kullin, Brian R</creator><creator>Gamieldien, Hoyam</creator><creator>Jaspan, Heather B</creator><creator>Varsani, Arvind</creator><creator>Martin, Darren</creator><creator>Passmore, Jo-Ann S</creator><creator>Froissart, Rémy</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-1308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0745-6073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4111-2415</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220120</creationdate><title>In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health</title><author>Happel, Anna-Ursula ; Kullin, Brian R ; Gamieldien, Hoyam ; Jaspan, Heather B ; Varsani, Arvind ; Martin, Darren ; Passmore, Jo-Ann S ; Froissart, Rémy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>antibiotic resistant genes</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>bacteriophages</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>genital</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Gynecology and obstetrics</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Lactobacillaceae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Prophages</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><topic>virulence factor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Happel, Anna-Ursula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kullin, Brian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamieldien, Hoyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaspan, Heather B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varsani, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passmore, Jo-Ann S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froissart, Rémy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Microorganisms (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Happel, Anna-Ursula</au><au>Kullin, Brian R</au><au>Gamieldien, Hoyam</au><au>Jaspan, Heather B</au><au>Varsani, Arvind</au><au>Martin, Darren</au><au>Passmore, Jo-Ann S</au><au>Froissart, Rémy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health</atitle><jtitle>Microorganisms (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Microorganisms</addtitle><date>2022-01-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>214</spage><pages>214-</pages><issn>2076-2607</issn><eissn>2076-2607</eissn><abstract>While live biotherapeutics offer a promising approach to optimizing vaginal microbiota, the presence of functional prophages within introduced strains could impact their safety and efficacy. We evaluated the presence of prophages in 895 publicly available genomes using Phaster, Phigaro, Phispy, Prophet and Virsorter. Prophages were identified according to stringent (detected by ≥4 methods) or lenient criteria (detected by ≥2 methods), both with &gt;80% reciprocal sequence overlap. The stringent approach identified 448 prophages within 359 genomes, with 40.1% genomes harbouring at least one prophage, while the lenient approach identified 1671 prophages within 83.7% of the genomes. To confirm our in silico estimates in vitro, we tested for inducible prophages in 57 vaginally-derived and commercial isolates and found inducible prophages in 61.4% of the isolates. We characterised the in silico predicted prophages based on weighted gene repertoire relatedness and found that most belonged to the or families. ResFam and eggNOG identified four potential antimicrobial resistance genes within the predicted prophages. Our results suggest that while prophages seldomly carry clinically concerning genes and thus unlikely a pose a direct risk to human vaginal microbiomes, their high prevalence warrants the characterisation of prophages in live biotherapeutics.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35208669</pmid><doi>10.3390/microorganisms10020214</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-1308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0745-6073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4111-2415</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-2607
ispartof Microorganisms (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.10 (2), p.214
issn 2076-2607
2076-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0cd4eb6e0f674335859591fb1936365e
source PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Algorithms
antibiotic resistant genes
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial resistance
Bacteria
Bacteriology
bacteriophages
Datasets
Genes
genital
Genomes
Gynecology and obstetrics
Human health and pathology
Infectious diseases
Lactobacillaceae
Life Sciences
Microbiology and Parasitology
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Probiotics
Prophages
Proteins
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Vagina
Virulence
virulence factor
title In Silico Characterisation of Putative Prophages in Lactobacillaceae Used in Probiotics for Vaginal Health
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A14%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Silico%20Characterisation%20of%20Putative%20Prophages%20in%20Lactobacillaceae%20Used%20in%20Probiotics%20for%20Vaginal%20Health&rft.jtitle=Microorganisms%20(Basel)&rft.au=Happel,%20Anna-Ursula&rft.date=2022-01-20&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=214&rft.pages=214-&rft.issn=2076-2607&rft.eissn=2076-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/microorganisms10020214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2633858893%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c1593531b2512a10dfd85cd16e8024d72df44631b68ad53b0f810b2bf141b6fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633027278&rft_id=info:pmid/35208669&rfr_iscdi=true