Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract

The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cadmus (Trieste, Italy) Italy), 2014-10, Vol.2 (3), p.152-161
Main Author: Radermacher, F J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carbon
Climate change
Emissions trading
Industrialized nations
Neutrality
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called 'Copenhagen Accord' that is based on a dynamic cap and an intelligent burden sharing between politics and the private sector. The private sector was brought into the deal via the idea of a voluntary climate neutrality of private emissions culminating in a 'Global Neutral'promoted by the United Nations. All this was based on a global capand-trade system. For a number of reasons, it may be that a global cap-and-trade system cannot or will not be established. States may use other instruments to fulfil their promises. The present paper elaborates that even under such conditions, the basic proposal can still be implemented. This may prove useful for the Paris negotiations.
ISSN:2038-5242
2038-5250