Unravelling the lung cancer diagnostic pathway: identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement

• Published in: Radiology and oncology 2024-06, Vol.58 (2), p.268-278
• Main Authors: Marc Malovrh, Mateja, Adamic, Katja
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Cancer therapies; Critical Pathways; diagnostic pathway; Diagnostic systems; Employees; Female; Humans; improvement; Intervals; Lung cancer; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Male; Medical diagnosis; Middle Aged; Occupational health; Patient Satisfaction; Patients; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Quality Improvement; Slovenia; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1581-3207; 1318-2099; 1581-3207; 0485-893X
• DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0025

A fast and well-organized complex diagnostic process is important for better success in the treatment of lung cancer patients. The aim of our study was to reveal the gaps and inefficiencies in the diagnostic process and to suggest improvement strategies in a single tertiary centre in Slovenia. We employed a comprehensive approach to carefully dissect all the steps in the diagnostic journey for individuals suspected of having lung cancer. We gathered and analysed information from employees and patients involved in the process by dedicated questionnaires. Further, we analysed the patients' data and calculated the diagnostic intervals for patients in two different periods. The major concerns among employees were stress and excessive administrative work. The important result of the visual journey and staff reports was the design of electronic diagnostic clinical pathway (eDCP), which could substantially increase safety and efficacy by diminishing the administrative burden of the employees. The patients were generally highly satisfied with diagnostic journey, but reported too long waiting times. By analysing two time periods, we revealed that diagnostic intervals exceeded the recommended timelines and got importantly shorter after two interventions - strengthening the diagnostic team and specially by purchase of additional PET-CT machine (the average time from general practitioner (GP) referral to the multidisciplinary treatment board (MDTB) decision was 50.8 [± 3.0] prior and 37.1 [± 2.3] days after the interventions). The study illuminated opportunities for refining the diagnostic journey for lung cancer patients, underscoring the importance of both administrative and capacity-related enhancements.