Loading…

Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season

The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communication & Society 2020-06, Vol.33 (3), p.51-65
Main Authors: Santander, Pedro, Elórtegui, Claudio, Buzzo, Camila
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3
cites
container_end_page 65
container_issue 3
container_start_page 51
container_title Communication & Society
container_volume 33
creator Santander, Pedro
Elórtegui, Claudio
Buzzo, Camila
description The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.
doi_str_mv 10.15581/003.33.3.51-65
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0e03bc1d12fe47448d98b7cb749d2b21</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0e03bc1d12fe47448d98b7cb749d2b21</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2412494181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNUnOvQp6zTr6lrY34yZtIKUF22ehj1kjY0uutE7wX-iv7toOoTAww5v33gy8pvlM8JQIock9xmzKxpoK0krxoZlQpmWrtJJX_82fmttaNxhjojQTnZ40f5evcRig3KHfBWoMkIZot-gbODtARTYFNBv3I5oTevA55d3xK5qhxXHnYq6xIgfDK0BCS9jCS6wn3uwQIiQPZ_ki-5PjTwjRolWFUlE4lJjWaG53exvXCS3A1pxumo-93Va4fevXzerxYTn_0T7_-v40nz23njExtJwo5fpeKCkZSMUdoarnwRLOsKMBglbKWxWodNjhTgjHOssUcCUptzKw6-bp4huy3Zh9iTtbjibbaM5ALmtjyxD9FgwGzJwngdB-1HOuQ6ed8k7xLlBHyej15eK1L_nPAepgNvlQ0vi-oZxQ3nGiT6z7C8uXXGuB_v0qweacnxnzM2wsI4iRgv0DEcaNeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2412494181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Santander, Pedro ; Elórtegui, Claudio ; Buzzo, Camila</creator><creatorcontrib>Santander, Pedro ; Elórtegui, Claudio ; Buzzo, Camila</creatorcontrib><description>The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2386-7876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2386-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15581/003.33.3.51-65</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra</publisher><subject>20th century ; Attention ; Audiences ; Big Data ; Broadcasting ; Broadcasting industry ; Campaigns ; Candidates ; Communication ; Computer platforms ; Consumption ; Debates ; digital attention ; Digital technology ; double screen ; Election results ; Elections ; Electoral campaign ; Intelligence ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Mass media ; Presidential candidates ; presidential debates ; Presidential elections ; Radio ; Radios ; Seasons ; Social media ; Social networks ; Symbiosis ; Television ; television and radio ; Television programs ; Television viewing ; Volumetric analysis ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Communication &amp; Society, 2020-06, Vol.33 (3), p.51-65</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5629-6977 ; 0000-0002-0768-2134 ; 0000-0001-9665-3505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2412494181/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2412494181?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,12825,12827,27903,27904,33202,36039,44342,74642</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santander, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elórtegui, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzzo, Camila</creatorcontrib><title>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</title><title>Communication &amp; Society</title><description>The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Broadcasting</subject><subject>Broadcasting industry</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer platforms</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>digital attention</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>double screen</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral campaign</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Presidential candidates</subject><subject>presidential debates</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Radio</subject><subject>Radios</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>television and radio</subject><subject>Television programs</subject><subject>Television viewing</subject><subject>Volumetric analysis</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>2386-7876</issn><issn>2386-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNUnOvQp6zTr6lrY34yZtIKUF22ehj1kjY0uutE7wX-iv7toOoTAww5v33gy8pvlM8JQIock9xmzKxpoK0krxoZlQpmWrtJJX_82fmttaNxhjojQTnZ40f5evcRig3KHfBWoMkIZot-gbODtARTYFNBv3I5oTevA55d3xK5qhxXHnYq6xIgfDK0BCS9jCS6wn3uwQIiQPZ_ki-5PjTwjRolWFUlE4lJjWaG53exvXCS3A1pxumo-93Va4fevXzerxYTn_0T7_-v40nz23njExtJwo5fpeKCkZSMUdoarnwRLOsKMBglbKWxWodNjhTgjHOssUcCUptzKw6-bp4huy3Zh9iTtbjibbaM5ALmtjyxD9FgwGzJwngdB-1HOuQ6ed8k7xLlBHyej15eK1L_nPAepgNvlQ0vi-oZxQ3nGiT6z7C8uXXGuB_v0qweacnxnzM2wsI4iRgv0DEcaNeA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Santander, Pedro</creator><creator>Elórtegui, Claudio</creator><creator>Buzzo, Camila</creator><general>Universidad de Navarra</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-6977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-2134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-3505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</title><author>Santander, Pedro ; Elórtegui, Claudio ; Buzzo, Camila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Broadcasting</topic><topic>Broadcasting industry</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer platforms</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>digital attention</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>double screen</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral campaign</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Presidential candidates</topic><topic>presidential debates</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Radio</topic><topic>Radios</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>television and radio</topic><topic>Television programs</topic><topic>Television viewing</topic><topic>Volumetric analysis</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santander, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elórtegui, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzzo, Camila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Communication &amp; Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santander, Pedro</au><au>Elórtegui, Claudio</au><au>Buzzo, Camila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</atitle><jtitle>Communication &amp; Society</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>51-65</pages><issn>2386-7876</issn><eissn>2386-7876</eissn><abstract>The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.</abstract><cop>Pamplona</cop><pub>Universidad de Navarra</pub><doi>10.15581/003.33.3.51-65</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-6977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-2134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-3505</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2386-7876
ispartof Communication & Society, 2020-06, Vol.33 (3), p.51-65
issn 2386-7876
2386-7876
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0e03bc1d12fe47448d98b7cb749d2b21
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects 20th century
Attention
Audiences
Big Data
Broadcasting
Broadcasting industry
Campaigns
Candidates
Communication
Computer platforms
Consumption
Debates
digital attention
Digital technology
double screen
Election results
Elections
Electoral campaign
Intelligence
Interdisciplinary aspects
Mass media
Presidential candidates
presidential debates
Presidential elections
Radio
Radios
Seasons
Social media
Social networks
Symbiosis
Television
television and radio
Television programs
Television viewing
Volumetric analysis
Voting
title Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twitter,%20Presidential%20Debates%20and%20Attention%20Economy:%20A%20Symbiosis%20between%20Television%20Audience%20and%20Social%20Media%20Users%20during%20Campaign%20Season&rft.jtitle=Communication%20&%20Society&rft.au=Santander,%20Pedro&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=51-65&rft.issn=2386-7876&rft.eissn=2386-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.15581/003.33.3.51-65&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2412494181%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2412494181&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true