Loading…
Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season
The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Communication & Society 2020-06, Vol.33 (3), p.51-65 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 65 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Communication & Society |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Santander, Pedro Elórtegui, Claudio Buzzo, Camila |
description | The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15581/003.33.3.51-65 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0e03bc1d12fe47448d98b7cb749d2b21</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0e03bc1d12fe47448d98b7cb749d2b21</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2412494181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNUnOvQp6zTr6lrY34yZtIKUF22ehj1kjY0uutE7wX-iv7toOoTAww5v33gy8pvlM8JQIock9xmzKxpoK0krxoZlQpmWrtJJX_82fmttaNxhjojQTnZ40f5evcRig3KHfBWoMkIZot-gbODtARTYFNBv3I5oTevA55d3xK5qhxXHnYq6xIgfDK0BCS9jCS6wn3uwQIiQPZ_ki-5PjTwjRolWFUlE4lJjWaG53exvXCS3A1pxumo-93Va4fevXzerxYTn_0T7_-v40nz23njExtJwo5fpeKCkZSMUdoarnwRLOsKMBglbKWxWodNjhTgjHOssUcCUptzKw6-bp4huy3Zh9iTtbjibbaM5ALmtjyxD9FgwGzJwngdB-1HOuQ6ed8k7xLlBHyej15eK1L_nPAepgNvlQ0vi-oZxQ3nGiT6z7C8uXXGuB_v0qweacnxnzM2wsI4iRgv0DEcaNeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2412494181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Santander, Pedro ; Elórtegui, Claudio ; Buzzo, Camila</creator><creatorcontrib>Santander, Pedro ; Elórtegui, Claudio ; Buzzo, Camila</creatorcontrib><description>The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2386-7876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2386-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15581/003.33.3.51-65</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra</publisher><subject>20th century ; Attention ; Audiences ; Big Data ; Broadcasting ; Broadcasting industry ; Campaigns ; Candidates ; Communication ; Computer platforms ; Consumption ; Debates ; digital attention ; Digital technology ; double screen ; Election results ; Elections ; Electoral campaign ; Intelligence ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Mass media ; Presidential candidates ; presidential debates ; Presidential elections ; Radio ; Radios ; Seasons ; Social media ; Social networks ; Symbiosis ; Television ; television and radio ; Television programs ; Television viewing ; Volumetric analysis ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Communication & Society, 2020-06, Vol.33 (3), p.51-65</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5629-6977 ; 0000-0002-0768-2134 ; 0000-0001-9665-3505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2412494181/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2412494181?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,12825,12827,27903,27904,33202,36039,44342,74642</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santander, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elórtegui, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzzo, Camila</creatorcontrib><title>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</title><title>Communication & Society</title><description>The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Broadcasting</subject><subject>Broadcasting industry</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer platforms</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>digital attention</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>double screen</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral campaign</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Presidential candidates</subject><subject>presidential debates</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Radio</subject><subject>Radios</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>television and radio</subject><subject>Television programs</subject><subject>Television viewing</subject><subject>Volumetric analysis</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>2386-7876</issn><issn>2386-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNUnOvQp6zTr6lrY34yZtIKUF22ehj1kjY0uutE7wX-iv7toOoTAww5v33gy8pvlM8JQIock9xmzKxpoK0krxoZlQpmWrtJJX_82fmttaNxhjojQTnZ40f5evcRig3KHfBWoMkIZot-gbODtARTYFNBv3I5oTevA55d3xK5qhxXHnYq6xIgfDK0BCS9jCS6wn3uwQIiQPZ_ki-5PjTwjRolWFUlE4lJjWaG53exvXCS3A1pxumo-93Va4fevXzerxYTn_0T7_-v40nz23njExtJwo5fpeKCkZSMUdoarnwRLOsKMBglbKWxWodNjhTgjHOssUcCUptzKw6-bp4huy3Zh9iTtbjibbaM5ALmtjyxD9FgwGzJwngdB-1HOuQ6ed8k7xLlBHyej15eK1L_nPAepgNvlQ0vi-oZxQ3nGiT6z7C8uXXGuB_v0qweacnxnzM2wsI4iRgv0DEcaNeA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Santander, Pedro</creator><creator>Elórtegui, Claudio</creator><creator>Buzzo, Camila</creator><general>Universidad de Navarra</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-6977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-2134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-3505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</title><author>Santander, Pedro ; Elórtegui, Claudio ; Buzzo, Camila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Broadcasting</topic><topic>Broadcasting industry</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer platforms</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>digital attention</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>double screen</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral campaign</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Presidential candidates</topic><topic>presidential debates</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Radio</topic><topic>Radios</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>television and radio</topic><topic>Television programs</topic><topic>Television viewing</topic><topic>Volumetric analysis</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santander, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elórtegui, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzzo, Camila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Communication & Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santander, Pedro</au><au>Elórtegui, Claudio</au><au>Buzzo, Camila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season</atitle><jtitle>Communication & Society</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>51-65</pages><issn>2386-7876</issn><eissn>2386-7876</eissn><abstract>The year 2017 was an intense electoral year in Chile, both parliamentary and presidential. In this context, by using computer intelligence, an interdisciplinary team conducted a collection and volumetric analysis of over 3 million Twitter messages belonging to users that mentioned, at least once, any of the presidential candidates, both in the first and second voting round. Our goal was focused on analyzing the relationship between traditional media (radio and television) and Twitter, probing user interactions during the broadcast of live political shows, with emphasis on presidential debates. For this purpose, we carried out a volumetric analysis of all mentions in social media during the broadcast of live political shows to characterize the digital attention of the audience, under different parameters. Our results show that there is high user interest in the digital debate regarding presidential debates, a positive correlation between traditional media and Twitter during the broadcast of live political shows, and that, also, the latter trigger social media; furthermore, we verify the double screen phenomenon made possible by mobile platforms.</abstract><cop>Pamplona</cop><pub>Universidad de Navarra</pub><doi>10.15581/003.33.3.51-65</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-6977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-2134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-3505</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2386-7876 |
ispartof | Communication & Society, 2020-06, Vol.33 (3), p.51-65 |
issn | 2386-7876 2386-7876 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0e03bc1d12fe47448d98b7cb749d2b21 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | 20th century Attention Audiences Big Data Broadcasting Broadcasting industry Campaigns Candidates Communication Computer platforms Consumption Debates digital attention Digital technology double screen Election results Elections Electoral campaign Intelligence Interdisciplinary aspects Mass media Presidential candidates presidential debates Presidential elections Radio Radios Seasons Social media Social networks Symbiosis Television television and radio Television programs Television viewing Volumetric analysis Voting |
title | Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twitter,%20Presidential%20Debates%20and%20Attention%20Economy:%20A%20Symbiosis%20between%20Television%20Audience%20and%20Social%20Media%20Users%20during%20Campaign%20Season&rft.jtitle=Communication%20&%20Society&rft.au=Santander,%20Pedro&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=51-65&rft.issn=2386-7876&rft.eissn=2386-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.15581/003.33.3.51-65&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2412494181%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4177bff57663e674b127f4da1430b2ded877ca7d26b0b0955b39a37e47624a6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2412494181&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |