Loading…

Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review

Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical Internet research 2021-05, Vol.23 (5), p.e23479-e23479
Main Authors: Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip, O'Connor, Siobhan, Akinlua, James Tosin, Wark, Petra A, Gallagher, Joseph, Carroll, Christopher, Car, Josip, Majeed, Azeem, O'Donoghue, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053
container_end_page e23479
container_issue 5
container_start_page e23479
container_title Journal of medical Internet research
container_volume 23
creator Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
O'Connor, Siobhan
Akinlua, James Tosin
Wark, Petra A
Gallagher, Joseph
Carroll, Christopher
Car, Josip
Majeed, Azeem
O'Donoghue, John
description Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142. RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.
doi_str_mv 10.2196/23479
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0eb1bf6626544b7c8fdf372b7b10fe46</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0eb1bf6626544b7c8fdf372b7b10fe46</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2511244412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9PFEEQxTtGI4h8BTMXEy8rXf1_PJgYENiExKB47nT3VO82zkxj9yxkv70DiwROVal69XuVPEIOgX5m0KojxoVuX5F9ENwsjNHw-lm_R97Vek0po6KFt2SPc8Ml5WKfXC7HmMvgppTH5nLj-jRtm9PiBrzL5U9t5mVzklZpcn1zjq6f1s0VhvWY-7xKWL80v7Z1wvv70PzE24R378mb6PqKh4_1gPw-_X51fL64-HG2PP52sQiCtdMCNGNKqs4AGqmUYpGhikG7rmNCc4SuowyRhSg9SINewzxQ0HopAlLJD8hyx-2yu7Y3JQ2ubG12yT4McllZV-a3erQUPfg4eygphNfBxC5yzbz2QCMKNbO-7lg3Gz9gF3CciutfQF9uxrS2q3xrDSitGMyAT4-Akv9usE52SDVg37sR86ZaJgGYEALYLP24k4aSay0Yn2yA2vso7UOUs-7D85-eVP-z4_8AXfSZKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511244412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip ; O'Connor, Siobhan ; Akinlua, James Tosin ; Wark, Petra A ; Gallagher, Joseph ; Carroll, Christopher ; Car, Josip ; Majeed, Azeem ; O'Donoghue, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip ; O'Connor, Siobhan ; Akinlua, James Tosin ; Wark, Petra A ; Gallagher, Joseph ; Carroll, Christopher ; Car, Josip ; Majeed, Azeem ; O'Donoghue, John</creatorcontrib><description>Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142. RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-4456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/23479</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33835034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical Internet research, 2021-05, Vol.23 (5), p.e23479-e23479</ispartof><rights>Kayode Philip Fadahunsi, Siobhan O'Connor, James Tosin Akinlua, Petra A Wark, Joseph Gallagher, Christopher Carroll, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, John O'Donoghue. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2021.</rights><rights>Kayode Philip Fadahunsi, Siobhan O'Connor, James Tosin Akinlua, Petra A Wark, Joseph Gallagher, Christopher Carroll, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, John O'Donoghue. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2021. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8579-1718 ; 0000-0002-5564-2890 ; 0000-0002-2357-9858 ; 0000-0001-8969-371X ; 0000-0002-9887-0033 ; 0000-0002-6361-6182 ; 0000-0001-6056-8640 ; 0000-0003-1020-4640 ; 0000-0003-1470-5493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,33589,33884,36990</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Siobhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinlua, James Tosin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wark, Petra A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Car, Josip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majeed, Azeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donoghue, John</creatorcontrib><title>Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review</title><title>Journal of medical Internet research</title><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><description>Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142. RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1439-4456</issn><issn>1438-8871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9PFEEQxTtGI4h8BTMXEy8rXf1_PJgYENiExKB47nT3VO82zkxj9yxkv70DiwROVal69XuVPEIOgX5m0KojxoVuX5F9ENwsjNHw-lm_R97Vek0po6KFt2SPc8Ml5WKfXC7HmMvgppTH5nLj-jRtm9PiBrzL5U9t5mVzklZpcn1zjq6f1s0VhvWY-7xKWL80v7Z1wvv70PzE24R378mb6PqKh4_1gPw-_X51fL64-HG2PP52sQiCtdMCNGNKqs4AGqmUYpGhikG7rmNCc4SuowyRhSg9SINewzxQ0HopAlLJD8hyx-2yu7Y3JQ2ubG12yT4McllZV-a3erQUPfg4eygphNfBxC5yzbz2QCMKNbO-7lg3Gz9gF3CciutfQF9uxrS2q3xrDSitGMyAT4-Akv9usE52SDVg37sR86ZaJgGYEALYLP24k4aSay0Yn2yA2vso7UOUs-7D85-eVP-z4_8AXfSZKg</recordid><startdate>20210517</startdate><enddate>20210517</enddate><creator>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip</creator><creator>O'Connor, Siobhan</creator><creator>Akinlua, James Tosin</creator><creator>Wark, Petra A</creator><creator>Gallagher, Joseph</creator><creator>Carroll, Christopher</creator><creator>Car, Josip</creator><creator>Majeed, Azeem</creator><creator>O'Donoghue, John</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-1718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-2890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-371X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9887-0033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-6182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-8640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1020-4640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1470-5493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210517</creationdate><title>Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review</title><author>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip ; O'Connor, Siobhan ; Akinlua, James Tosin ; Wark, Petra A ; Gallagher, Joseph ; Carroll, Christopher ; Car, Josip ; Majeed, Azeem ; O'Donoghue, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Siobhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinlua, James Tosin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wark, Petra A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Car, Josip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majeed, Azeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donoghue, John</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip</au><au>O'Connor, Siobhan</au><au>Akinlua, James Tosin</au><au>Wark, Petra A</au><au>Gallagher, Joseph</au><au>Carroll, Christopher</au><au>Car, Josip</au><au>Majeed, Azeem</au><au>O'Donoghue, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><date>2021-05-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e23479</spage><epage>e23479</epage><pages>e23479-e23479</pages><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1439-4456</issn><eissn>1438-8871</eissn><abstract>Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142. RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>33835034</pmid><doi>10.2196/23479</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-1718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-2890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-371X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9887-0033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-6182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-8640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1020-4640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1470-5493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-8871
ispartof Journal of medical Internet research, 2021-05, Vol.23 (5), p.e23479-e23479
issn 1438-8871
1439-4456
1438-8871
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0eb1bf6626544b7c8fdf372b7b10fe46
source Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Review
title Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A43%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20Quality%20Frameworks%20for%20Digital%20Health%20Technologies:%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20Internet%20research&rft.au=Fadahunsi,%20Kayode%20Philip&rft.date=2021-05-17&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e23479&rft.epage=e23479&rft.pages=e23479-e23479&rft.issn=1438-8871&rft.eissn=1438-8871&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/23479&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2511244412%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-1722656d81e856662f2e6fc7add2473e1dd02ee2cf5b158eb71d02619b54ce053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511244412&rft_id=info:pmid/33835034&rfr_iscdi=true