Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Grafting Material: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether autogenous tooth grafting material (ATGM) is as safe and effective as other bone substitutes used for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures, evaluating histomorphometric and/or histological data, implant primary stability, associated compl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-08, Vol.9 (9), p.518
Main Authors: Ghodsian, Diba, D'Jesús, Sofía, Sánchez-Labrador, Luis, Cobo-Vázquez, Carlos Manuel, Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann, Jorge, Martínez-González, José María, Meniz-García, Cristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
autogenous tooth graft material
Autografts
Automation
biological complications
Biomedical materials
Body height
Bone biomaterials
Bone grafts
Bone-grafting
Calcium phosphates
Clinical trials
Cohort analysis
Connective tissue
Dental implants
Dentin
Dentistry
Edentulous
Health aspects
histomorphometry
Maxillary sinus
maxillary sinus floor elevation
Maxillofacial surgery
Meta-analysis
Orthognathic surgery
Sinuses
Skin & tissue grafts
Surgery, Experimental
Surgical outcomes
Surgical research
Systematic Review
Teeth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether autogenous tooth grafting material (ATGM) is as safe and effective as other bone substitutes used for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures, evaluating histomorphometric and/or histological data, implant primary stability, associated complications and radiographic bone height measurements. An automated electronic search was conducted using four databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library), supplemented by a manual search, to identify clinical human studies using particulate ATGM for the aforementioned procedure. The included studies had a sample size of at least four patients and were published before 31st July 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist were used to assess the risk of bias in cohort studies and case series, respectively. Seven studies were included in the descriptive analysis, obtaining 128 participants (46.8% only treated with ATGM) and 192 placed implants. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, meta-analysis could not be performed. The authors concluded that ATGM appears to be a feasible and safe alternative for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited amount of scientific evidence on this topic and the heterogeneity between the included studies.
ISSN:2313-7673
2313-7673
DOI:10.3390/biomimetics9090518