Loading…
A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming
Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1446 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1446 |
container_title | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Dimc, Franc Bažec, Matej |
description | Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/s21041446 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0f34e68e1d24403eb54f4b7ba8abfe2c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0f34e68e1d24403eb54f4b7ba8abfe2c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2498492465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1vEzEQhi0Eoh9w4A8gH-EQ6q_deC9IUVTaoggkClyt2fU4cbRrL_amUvn1OE2J2pNn3nn9zEgvIe84-yRlwy6y4ExxpeoX5JQroWZaCPbySX1CznLeMiaklPo1OZGyrpuaqVOyXdBlHEZIMPk7pIsA_X32mUZHpw3SH5jHGDLu-6tvt7dF6LAYU6a7YDHR35gm30FPIVh6HZP_G8NU2hW_uOR0ufFppF9hGHxYvyGvHPQZ3z6-5-TXl8ufy-vZ6vvVzXKxmnVK8WnWgZNQtrQWdauhVlzYIkAj50I2wllRtZJprp3AVqGobakraPTcaoV1I8_JzYFrI2zNmPwA6d5E8OZBiGltYH90j4Y5Wb5o5FYoxSS2lXKqnbegoXUousL6fGCNu3ZA22GYEvTPoM8nwW_MOt6ZeSMEr2QBfHgEpPhnh3kyg88d9j0EjLtshGq0aoSqq2L9eLB2Keac0B3XcGb2OZtjzsX7_uldR-f_YOU_KjujXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2498492465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona ; Dimc, Franc ; Bažec, Matej</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona ; Dimc, Franc ; Bažec, Matej</creatorcontrib><description>Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s21041446</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33669604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers ; intentional interference ; L1/E1 chirp jammer ; vertical/horizontal jamming profile</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1446</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2580-7786 ; 0000-0002-0914-9595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922153/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922153/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimc, Franc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bažec, Matej</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.</description><subject>geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers</subject><subject>intentional interference</subject><subject>L1/E1 chirp jammer</subject><subject>vertical/horizontal jamming profile</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1vEzEQhi0Eoh9w4A8gH-EQ6q_deC9IUVTaoggkClyt2fU4cbRrL_amUvn1OE2J2pNn3nn9zEgvIe84-yRlwy6y4ExxpeoX5JQroWZaCPbySX1CznLeMiaklPo1OZGyrpuaqVOyXdBlHEZIMPk7pIsA_X32mUZHpw3SH5jHGDLu-6tvt7dF6LAYU6a7YDHR35gm30FPIVh6HZP_G8NU2hW_uOR0ufFppF9hGHxYvyGvHPQZ3z6-5-TXl8ufy-vZ6vvVzXKxmnVK8WnWgZNQtrQWdauhVlzYIkAj50I2wllRtZJprp3AVqGobakraPTcaoV1I8_JzYFrI2zNmPwA6d5E8OZBiGltYH90j4Y5Wb5o5FYoxSS2lXKqnbegoXUousL6fGCNu3ZA22GYEvTPoM8nwW_MOt6ZeSMEr2QBfHgEpPhnh3kyg88d9j0EjLtshGq0aoSqq2L9eLB2Keac0B3XcGb2OZtjzsX7_uldR-f_YOU_KjujXQ</recordid><startdate>20210219</startdate><enddate>20210219</enddate><creator>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</creator><creator>Dimc, Franc</creator><creator>Bažec, Matej</creator><general>MDPI</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2580-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-9595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210219</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</title><author>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona ; Dimc, Franc ; Bažec, Matej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers</topic><topic>intentional interference</topic><topic>L1/E1 chirp jammer</topic><topic>vertical/horizontal jamming profile</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimc, Franc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bažec, Matej</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</au><au>Dimc, Franc</au><au>Bažec, Matej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2021-02-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1446</spage><pages>1446-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>33669604</pmid><doi>10.3390/s21041446</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2580-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-9595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8220 |
ispartof | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1446 |
issn | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0f34e68e1d24403eb54f4b7ba8abfe2c |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers intentional interference L1/E1 chirp jammer vertical/horizontal jamming profile |
title | A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Response%20of%20GNSS%20Receivers%20under%20Vertical%20and%20Horizontal%20L1/E1%20Chirp%20Jamming&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Pavlov%C4%8Di%C4%8D-Pre%C5%A1eren,%20Polona&rft.date=2021-02-19&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1446&rft.pages=1446-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s21041446&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2498492465%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2498492465&rft_id=info:pmid/33669604&rfr_iscdi=true |