Loading…

A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming

Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1446
Main Authors: Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona, Dimc, Franc, Bažec, Matej
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1446
container_title Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 21
creator Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
Dimc, Franc
Bažec, Matej
description Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/s21041446
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0f34e68e1d24403eb54f4b7ba8abfe2c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0f34e68e1d24403eb54f4b7ba8abfe2c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2498492465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1vEzEQhi0Eoh9w4A8gH-EQ6q_deC9IUVTaoggkClyt2fU4cbRrL_amUvn1OE2J2pNn3nn9zEgvIe84-yRlwy6y4ExxpeoX5JQroWZaCPbySX1CznLeMiaklPo1OZGyrpuaqVOyXdBlHEZIMPk7pIsA_X32mUZHpw3SH5jHGDLu-6tvt7dF6LAYU6a7YDHR35gm30FPIVh6HZP_G8NU2hW_uOR0ufFppF9hGHxYvyGvHPQZ3z6-5-TXl8ufy-vZ6vvVzXKxmnVK8WnWgZNQtrQWdauhVlzYIkAj50I2wllRtZJprp3AVqGobakraPTcaoV1I8_JzYFrI2zNmPwA6d5E8OZBiGltYH90j4Y5Wb5o5FYoxSS2lXKqnbegoXUousL6fGCNu3ZA22GYEvTPoM8nwW_MOt6ZeSMEr2QBfHgEpPhnh3kyg88d9j0EjLtshGq0aoSqq2L9eLB2Keac0B3XcGb2OZtjzsX7_uldR-f_YOU_KjujXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2498492465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona ; Dimc, Franc ; Bažec, Matej</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona ; Dimc, Franc ; Bažec, Matej</creatorcontrib><description>Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s21041446</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33669604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers ; intentional interference ; L1/E1 chirp jammer ; vertical/horizontal jamming profile</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1446</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2580-7786 ; 0000-0002-0914-9595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922153/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922153/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimc, Franc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bažec, Matej</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.</description><subject>geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers</subject><subject>intentional interference</subject><subject>L1/E1 chirp jammer</subject><subject>vertical/horizontal jamming profile</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1vEzEQhi0Eoh9w4A8gH-EQ6q_deC9IUVTaoggkClyt2fU4cbRrL_amUvn1OE2J2pNn3nn9zEgvIe84-yRlwy6y4ExxpeoX5JQroWZaCPbySX1CznLeMiaklPo1OZGyrpuaqVOyXdBlHEZIMPk7pIsA_X32mUZHpw3SH5jHGDLu-6tvt7dF6LAYU6a7YDHR35gm30FPIVh6HZP_G8NU2hW_uOR0ufFppF9hGHxYvyGvHPQZ3z6-5-TXl8ufy-vZ6vvVzXKxmnVK8WnWgZNQtrQWdauhVlzYIkAj50I2wllRtZJprp3AVqGobakraPTcaoV1I8_JzYFrI2zNmPwA6d5E8OZBiGltYH90j4Y5Wb5o5FYoxSS2lXKqnbegoXUousL6fGCNu3ZA22GYEvTPoM8nwW_MOt6ZeSMEr2QBfHgEpPhnh3kyg88d9j0EjLtshGq0aoSqq2L9eLB2Keac0B3XcGb2OZtjzsX7_uldR-f_YOU_KjujXQ</recordid><startdate>20210219</startdate><enddate>20210219</enddate><creator>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</creator><creator>Dimc, Franc</creator><creator>Bažec, Matej</creator><general>MDPI</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2580-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-9595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210219</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</title><author>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona ; Dimc, Franc ; Bažec, Matej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers</topic><topic>intentional interference</topic><topic>L1/E1 chirp jammer</topic><topic>vertical/horizontal jamming profile</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimc, Franc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bažec, Matej</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona</au><au>Dimc, Franc</au><au>Bažec, Matej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2021-02-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1446</spage><pages>1446-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>33669604</pmid><doi>10.3390/s21041446</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2580-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-9595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1424-8220
ispartof Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1446
issn 1424-8220
1424-8220
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0f34e68e1d24403eb54f4b7ba8abfe2c
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects geodetic and low-cost GNSS receivers
intentional interference
L1/E1 chirp jammer
vertical/horizontal jamming profile
title A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Response%20of%20GNSS%20Receivers%20under%20Vertical%20and%20Horizontal%20L1/E1%20Chirp%20Jamming&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Pavlov%C4%8Di%C4%8D-Pre%C5%A1eren,%20Polona&rft.date=2021-02-19&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1446&rft.pages=1446-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s21041446&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2498492465%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-caf3aecebde8b8a6412d3aea9372392fd25b30818f2eb4e26d8185a987d84e693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2498492465&rft_id=info:pmid/33669604&rfr_iscdi=true