Loading…

Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion: The USC technique

Introduction: Radical cystectomy is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and refractory nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. We describe our technique for robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), that replicates open surgical principles, and present our...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of urology 2014-07, Vol.30 (3), p.300-306
Main Authors: Abreu, Andre, Chopra, Sameer, Azhar, Raed, Berger, Andre, Miranda, Gus, Cai, Jie, Gill, Inderbir, Aron, Monish, Desai, Mihir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c670o-7cd019645c48a549c1680d1e10529bc7ddb0b351756428a7c4fa24c4bfd702343
cites
container_end_page 306
container_issue 3
container_start_page 300
container_title Indian journal of urology
container_volume 30
creator Abreu, Andre
Chopra, Sameer
Azhar, Raed
Berger, Andre
Miranda, Gus
Cai, Jie
Gill, Inderbir
Aron, Monish
Desai, Mihir
description Introduction: Radical cystectomy is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and refractory nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. We describe our technique for robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), that replicates open surgical principles, and present our preliminary results. Materials and Methods: Specific descriptions for preoperative planning, surgical technique, and postoperative care are provided. Demographics, perioperative and 30-day complications data were collected prospectively and retrospectively analyzed. Learning curve trends were analyzed individually for ileal conduits (IC) and neobladders (NB). SAS ® Software Version 9.3 was used for statistical analyses with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Between July 2010 and September 2013, RRC and lymph node dissection with ICUD were performed in 103 consecutive patients (orthotopic NB=46, IC 57). All procedures were completed robotically replicating the open surgical principles. The learning curve trends showed a significant reduction in hospital stay for both IC (11 vs. 6-day, P < 0.01) and orthotopic NB (13 vs. 7.5-day, P < 0.01) when comparing the first third of the cohort with the rest of the group. Overall median (range) operative time and estimated blood loss was 7 h (4.8-13) and 200 mL (50-1200), respectively. Within 30-day postoperatively, complications occurred in 61 (59%) patients, with the majority being low grade (n = 43), and no patient died. Median (range) nodes yield was 36 (0-106) and 4 (3.9%) specimens had positive surgical margins. Conclusions: Robotic radical cystectomy with totally ICUD is safe and feasible. It can be performed using the established open surgical principles with encouraging perioperative outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0970-1591.135673
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0f72bf09b446446ea997ba04c54061a2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A377925974</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0f72bf09b446446ea997ba04c54061a2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A377925974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c670o-7cd019645c48a549c1680d1e10529bc7ddb0b351756428a7c4fa24c4bfd702343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt1r2zAUxc3YWLNu73sahr30xdnVl2XtYVDCPgqFQdY-C1mSE6WOlMl2Q_77yUuaNSPYYND9nYPu8cmy9wimFAH5BIJDgZhAU0RYycmLbIKEqApSYfoymxzHF9mbrlsBUFTh8nV2gVkaEcQn2Xwe6tA7nUdlnFZtrnddb3Uf1rtceZM730elQ9yEaNN0iM6ruMuNe7Sxc8F_zu-WNr__NcuTaund78G-zV41qu3su8P3Mrv_9vVu9qO4_fn9ZnZ9W-iSQyi4NoBESZmmlWJUaFRWYJBFwLCoNTemhpowxFlJcaW4po3CVNO6MRwwoeQyu9n7mqBWchPdOt1MBuXk34MQF1LFtFprJTQc1w2ImtIyvVYJwWsFVDMKJVI4eX3Ze22Gem2NtuPa7Ynp6cS7pVyER0kRBoyqZHB1MIghZdD1cu06bdtWeRuGTiLGUIUqISChH_9DV2GIPkU1UrgsqxKjf9RCpQWcb8L4I0ZTeU04F5gJPmZQnKEW1tt0yeBt49LxCT89w6fH2LXTZwWwF-gYui7a5pgJAjl2UI4lk2PJ5L6DSfLheZZHwVPpEjDfA9vQ9qlGD-2wtVEm9sGH7Ylx8cxYEgB5qKs81FU-1ZX8AVvH7-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552668621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion: The USC technique</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Abreu, Andre ; Chopra, Sameer ; Azhar, Raed ; Berger, Andre ; Miranda, Gus ; Cai, Jie ; Gill, Inderbir ; Aron, Monish ; Desai, Mihir</creator><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Andre ; Chopra, Sameer ; Azhar, Raed ; Berger, Andre ; Miranda, Gus ; Cai, Jie ; Gill, Inderbir ; Aron, Monish ; Desai, Mihir</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Radical cystectomy is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and refractory nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. We describe our technique for robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), that replicates open surgical principles, and present our preliminary results. Materials and Methods: Specific descriptions for preoperative planning, surgical technique, and postoperative care are provided. Demographics, perioperative and 30-day complications data were collected prospectively and retrospectively analyzed. Learning curve trends were analyzed individually for ileal conduits (IC) and neobladders (NB). SAS ® Software Version 9.3 was used for statistical analyses with statistical significance set at P &lt; 0.05. Results: Between July 2010 and September 2013, RRC and lymph node dissection with ICUD were performed in 103 consecutive patients (orthotopic NB=46, IC 57). All procedures were completed robotically replicating the open surgical principles. The learning curve trends showed a significant reduction in hospital stay for both IC (11 vs. 6-day, P &lt; 0.01) and orthotopic NB (13 vs. 7.5-day, P &lt; 0.01) when comparing the first third of the cohort with the rest of the group. Overall median (range) operative time and estimated blood loss was 7 h (4.8-13) and 200 mL (50-1200), respectively. Within 30-day postoperatively, complications occurred in 61 (59%) patients, with the majority being low grade (n = 43), and no patient died. Median (range) nodes yield was 36 (0-106) and 4 (3.9%) specimens had positive surgical margins. Conclusions: Robotic radical cystectomy with totally ICUD is safe and feasible. It can be performed using the established open surgical principles with encouraging perioperative outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.135673</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25097317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bladder cancer ; Care and treatment ; Cystectomy ; Health aspects ; Innovations ; intracorporeal urinary diversion ; Methods ; robot-assisted radical cystectomy ; robotic ; Robotic surgery ; Symposium ; urinary diversion</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of urology, 2014-07, Vol.30 (3), p.300-306</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Jul-Sep 2014</rights><rights>Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c670o-7cd019645c48a549c1680d1e10529bc7ddb0b351756428a7c4fa24c4bfd702343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1552668621/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1552668621?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27458,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, Sameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azhar, Raed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Gus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Inderbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aron, Monish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mihir</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion: The USC technique</title><title>Indian journal of urology</title><addtitle>Indian J Urol</addtitle><description>Introduction: Radical cystectomy is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and refractory nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. We describe our technique for robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), that replicates open surgical principles, and present our preliminary results. Materials and Methods: Specific descriptions for preoperative planning, surgical technique, and postoperative care are provided. Demographics, perioperative and 30-day complications data were collected prospectively and retrospectively analyzed. Learning curve trends were analyzed individually for ileal conduits (IC) and neobladders (NB). SAS ® Software Version 9.3 was used for statistical analyses with statistical significance set at P &lt; 0.05. Results: Between July 2010 and September 2013, RRC and lymph node dissection with ICUD were performed in 103 consecutive patients (orthotopic NB=46, IC 57). All procedures were completed robotically replicating the open surgical principles. The learning curve trends showed a significant reduction in hospital stay for both IC (11 vs. 6-day, P &lt; 0.01) and orthotopic NB (13 vs. 7.5-day, P &lt; 0.01) when comparing the first third of the cohort with the rest of the group. Overall median (range) operative time and estimated blood loss was 7 h (4.8-13) and 200 mL (50-1200), respectively. Within 30-day postoperatively, complications occurred in 61 (59%) patients, with the majority being low grade (n = 43), and no patient died. Median (range) nodes yield was 36 (0-106) and 4 (3.9%) specimens had positive surgical margins. Conclusions: Robotic radical cystectomy with totally ICUD is safe and feasible. It can be performed using the established open surgical principles with encouraging perioperative outcomes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cystectomy</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>intracorporeal urinary diversion</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>robot-assisted radical cystectomy</subject><subject>robotic</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Symposium</subject><subject>urinary diversion</subject><issn>0970-1591</issn><issn>1998-3824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt1r2zAUxc3YWLNu73sahr30xdnVl2XtYVDCPgqFQdY-C1mSE6WOlMl2Q_77yUuaNSPYYND9nYPu8cmy9wimFAH5BIJDgZhAU0RYycmLbIKEqApSYfoymxzHF9mbrlsBUFTh8nV2gVkaEcQn2Xwe6tA7nUdlnFZtrnddb3Uf1rtceZM730elQ9yEaNN0iM6ruMuNe7Sxc8F_zu-WNr__NcuTaund78G-zV41qu3su8P3Mrv_9vVu9qO4_fn9ZnZ9W-iSQyi4NoBESZmmlWJUaFRWYJBFwLCoNTemhpowxFlJcaW4po3CVNO6MRwwoeQyu9n7mqBWchPdOt1MBuXk34MQF1LFtFprJTQc1w2ImtIyvVYJwWsFVDMKJVI4eX3Ze22Gem2NtuPa7Ynp6cS7pVyER0kRBoyqZHB1MIghZdD1cu06bdtWeRuGTiLGUIUqISChH_9DV2GIPkU1UrgsqxKjf9RCpQWcb8L4I0ZTeU04F5gJPmZQnKEW1tt0yeBt49LxCT89w6fH2LXTZwWwF-gYui7a5pgJAjl2UI4lk2PJ5L6DSfLheZZHwVPpEjDfA9vQ9qlGD-2wtVEm9sGH7Ylx8cxYEgB5qKs81FU-1ZX8AVvH7-4</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Abreu, Andre</creator><creator>Chopra, Sameer</creator><creator>Azhar, Raed</creator><creator>Berger, Andre</creator><creator>Miranda, Gus</creator><creator>Cai, Jie</creator><creator>Gill, Inderbir</creator><creator>Aron, Monish</creator><creator>Desai, Mihir</creator><general>Medknow Publications</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion: The USC technique</title><author>Abreu, Andre ; Chopra, Sameer ; Azhar, Raed ; Berger, Andre ; Miranda, Gus ; Cai, Jie ; Gill, Inderbir ; Aron, Monish ; Desai, Mihir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c670o-7cd019645c48a549c1680d1e10529bc7ddb0b351756428a7c4fa24c4bfd702343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cystectomy</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>intracorporeal urinary diversion</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>robot-assisted radical cystectomy</topic><topic>robotic</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Symposium</topic><topic>urinary diversion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, Sameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azhar, Raed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Gus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Inderbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aron, Monish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mihir</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abreu, Andre</au><au>Chopra, Sameer</au><au>Azhar, Raed</au><au>Berger, Andre</au><au>Miranda, Gus</au><au>Cai, Jie</au><au>Gill, Inderbir</au><au>Aron, Monish</au><au>Desai, Mihir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion: The USC technique</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Urol</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0970-1591</issn><eissn>1998-3824</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Radical cystectomy is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and refractory nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. We describe our technique for robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), that replicates open surgical principles, and present our preliminary results. Materials and Methods: Specific descriptions for preoperative planning, surgical technique, and postoperative care are provided. Demographics, perioperative and 30-day complications data were collected prospectively and retrospectively analyzed. Learning curve trends were analyzed individually for ileal conduits (IC) and neobladders (NB). SAS ® Software Version 9.3 was used for statistical analyses with statistical significance set at P &lt; 0.05. Results: Between July 2010 and September 2013, RRC and lymph node dissection with ICUD were performed in 103 consecutive patients (orthotopic NB=46, IC 57). All procedures were completed robotically replicating the open surgical principles. The learning curve trends showed a significant reduction in hospital stay for both IC (11 vs. 6-day, P &lt; 0.01) and orthotopic NB (13 vs. 7.5-day, P &lt; 0.01) when comparing the first third of the cohort with the rest of the group. Overall median (range) operative time and estimated blood loss was 7 h (4.8-13) and 200 mL (50-1200), respectively. Within 30-day postoperatively, complications occurred in 61 (59%) patients, with the majority being low grade (n = 43), and no patient died. Median (range) nodes yield was 36 (0-106) and 4 (3.9%) specimens had positive surgical margins. Conclusions: Robotic radical cystectomy with totally ICUD is safe and feasible. It can be performed using the established open surgical principles with encouraging perioperative outcomes.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications</pub><pmid>25097317</pmid><doi>10.4103/0970-1591.135673</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0970-1591
ispartof Indian journal of urology, 2014-07, Vol.30 (3), p.300-306
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0f72bf09b446446ea997ba04c54061a2
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Bladder cancer
Care and treatment
Cystectomy
Health aspects
Innovations
intracorporeal urinary diversion
Methods
robot-assisted radical cystectomy
robotic
Robotic surgery
Symposium
urinary diversion
title Robotic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion: The USC technique
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20radical%20cystectomy%20and%20intracorporeal%20urinary%20diversion:%20The%20USC%20technique&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Abreu,%20Andre&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0970-1591&rft.eissn=1998-3824&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0970-1591.135673&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA377925974%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c670o-7cd019645c48a549c1680d1e10529bc7ddb0b351756428a7c4fa24c4bfd702343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552668621&rft_id=info:pmid/25097317&rft_galeid=A377925974&rfr_iscdi=true