Chronicity of Stroke Does Not Affect Outcomes of Somatosensory Stimulation Paired With Task-Oriented Motor Training: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

• Published in: Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation 2019-06, Vol.1 (1-2), p.100005-100005, Article 100005
• Main Authors: Carrico, Cheryl, Annichiarico, Nicholas, Powell, Elizabeth Salmon, Westgate, Philip M, Sawaki, Lumy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original Research
• ISSN: 2590-1095; 2590-1095
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100005

To determine whether chronicity influences outcomes of somatosensory stimulation paired with task-oriented motor training for participants with severe-to-moderate upper extremity hemiparesis. Spearman correlations were used to retrospectively analyze outcomes of a randomized trial. University research laboratory at a rehabilitation hospital. Adults, ranging between 3 and 12 months poststroke (N=55). About 18 sessions pairing either 2 hours of active (n=33) or sham (n=22) somatosensory stimulation with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented motor training. The Wolf Motor Function Test (primary), Action Research Arm Test, Stroke Impact Scale, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment were collected as outcome measures. Analyses evaluated whether within-group chronicity correlated with pre-post changes on primary and secondary outcome measures of motor performance. Both groups exhibited improvements on all outcome measures. No significant correlations between chronicity poststroke and the amount of motor recovery were found. Somatosensory stimulation improved motor recovery compared with sham treatment in cases of severe-to-moderate hemiparesis between 3 and 12 months poststroke; and the extent of recovery did not correlate with baseline levels of stroke chronicity. Future studies should investigate a wider period of inclusion, patterns of corticospinal reorganization, differences between cortical and subcortical strokes, and include long-term follow-up periods.