Loading…
Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity
Auditory stream segregation refers to a segregated percept of signal streams with different acoustic features. Different approaches have been pursued in studies of stream segregation. In psychoacoustics, stream segregation has mostly been investigated with a subjective task asking the subjects to re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in neuroscience 2014-06, Vol.8, p.119-119 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3 |
container_end_page | 119 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 119 |
container_title | Frontiers in neuroscience |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa Brechmann, André Klump, Georg M Deike, Susann |
description | Auditory stream segregation refers to a segregated percept of signal streams with different acoustic features. Different approaches have been pursued in studies of stream segregation. In psychoacoustics, stream segregation has mostly been investigated with a subjective task asking the subjects to report their percept. Few studies have applied an objective task in which stream segregation is evaluated indirectly by determining thresholds for a percept that depends on whether auditory streams are segregated or not. Furthermore, both perceptual measures and physiological measures of brain activity have been employed but only little is known about their relation. How the results from different tasks and measures are related is evaluated in the present study using examples relying on the ABA- stimulation paradigm that apply the same stimuli. We presented A and B signals that were sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones providing purely temporal, spectral or both types of cues to evaluate perceptual stream segregation and its physiological correlate. Which types of cues are most prominent was determined by the choice of carrier and modulation frequencies (f mod) of the signals. In the subjective task subjects reported their percept and in the objective task we measured their sensitivity for detecting time-shifts of B signals in an ABA- sequence. As a further measure of processes underlying stream segregation we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). SAM tone parameters were chosen to evoke an integrated (1-stream), a segregated (2-stream), or an ambiguous percept by adjusting the f mod difference between A and B tones (Δf mod). The results of both psychoacoustical tasks are significantly correlated. BOLD responses in fMRI depend on Δf mod between A and B SAM tones. The effect of Δf mod, however, differs between auditory cortex and frontal regions suggesting differences in representation related to the degree of perceptual ambiguity of the sequences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fnins.2014.00119 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_102d227441d1422faff65cd3abbe4cdc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_102d227441d1422faff65cd3abbe4cdc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2305000011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhzglZ4tIDCf5cby5IVVXaSkUcAImb5bXHqcPGDrY3Us78cbxJiSgnTrZnnnk1M36b5jXBc8a6xXsXfMhzigmfY0zI4klzStqWzrhg358e77w7aV7kvMK4pR2nz5sTyhesJRKfNr-utnoYdfFhifRofYlph3JJoNcowzLBsuZiQNGhLxefUIkBavznCMFARn1lx34FpvgtIB0sisfXJu_MfdQmjrl4owdUdP6R3-2pPmkfkJ5AX3Yvm2dODxlePZxnzbePV18vb2Z3n69vLy_uZkZQVmba9FI6YMIJLlorGUhCWtFiiXu-oKLteM9k5xzFxjEhLZbEEO4Ag5W069lZc3vQtVGv1Cb5tU47FbVX-0BMS6VT7XUARTC1lErOiSWcUqeda4WxTPc9cGNN1fpw0NqM_RqsgVCSHh6JPs4Ef6-Wcas45rJjtAqcPwikWNeZi1r7bGAYdIC6MkUE5_VLmRT_gTJJpBRkUn37D7qKYwp1q4oyLDCebFIpfKBMijkncMe-CVaTsdTeWGoyltobq5a8-XveY8EfJ7HfkaXMmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305000011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa ; Brechmann, André ; Klump, Georg M ; Deike, Susann</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa ; Brechmann, André ; Klump, Georg M ; Deike, Susann</creatorcontrib><description>Auditory stream segregation refers to a segregated percept of signal streams with different acoustic features. Different approaches have been pursued in studies of stream segregation. In psychoacoustics, stream segregation has mostly been investigated with a subjective task asking the subjects to report their percept. Few studies have applied an objective task in which stream segregation is evaluated indirectly by determining thresholds for a percept that depends on whether auditory streams are segregated or not. Furthermore, both perceptual measures and physiological measures of brain activity have been employed but only little is known about their relation. How the results from different tasks and measures are related is evaluated in the present study using examples relying on the ABA- stimulation paradigm that apply the same stimuli. We presented A and B signals that were sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones providing purely temporal, spectral or both types of cues to evaluate perceptual stream segregation and its physiological correlate. Which types of cues are most prominent was determined by the choice of carrier and modulation frequencies (f mod) of the signals. In the subjective task subjects reported their percept and in the objective task we measured their sensitivity for detecting time-shifts of B signals in an ABA- sequence. As a further measure of processes underlying stream segregation we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). SAM tone parameters were chosen to evoke an integrated (1-stream), a segregated (2-stream), or an ambiguous percept by adjusting the f mod difference between A and B tones (Δf mod). The results of both psychoacoustical tasks are significantly correlated. BOLD responses in fMRI depend on Δf mod between A and B SAM tones. The effect of Δf mod, however, differs between auditory cortex and frontal regions suggesting differences in representation related to the degree of perceptual ambiguity of the sequences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-4548</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-453X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24936170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Abscisic acid ; amplitude modulation ; Auditory perception ; auditory scene analysis ; BOLD response ; Brain mapping ; Cortex (auditory) ; Cortex (frontal) ; Cortex (temporal) ; fMRI ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Hearing ; Measurement techniques ; Neuroimaging ; Neurosciences ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Sound ; temporal and spectral cues ; time shift detection</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014-06, Vol.8, p.119-119</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Dolležal, Brechmann, Klump and Deike. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2305000011/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2305000011?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brechmann, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klump, Georg M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deike, Susann</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity</title><title>Frontiers in neuroscience</title><addtitle>Front Neurosci</addtitle><description>Auditory stream segregation refers to a segregated percept of signal streams with different acoustic features. Different approaches have been pursued in studies of stream segregation. In psychoacoustics, stream segregation has mostly been investigated with a subjective task asking the subjects to report their percept. Few studies have applied an objective task in which stream segregation is evaluated indirectly by determining thresholds for a percept that depends on whether auditory streams are segregated or not. Furthermore, both perceptual measures and physiological measures of brain activity have been employed but only little is known about their relation. How the results from different tasks and measures are related is evaluated in the present study using examples relying on the ABA- stimulation paradigm that apply the same stimuli. We presented A and B signals that were sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones providing purely temporal, spectral or both types of cues to evaluate perceptual stream segregation and its physiological correlate. Which types of cues are most prominent was determined by the choice of carrier and modulation frequencies (f mod) of the signals. In the subjective task subjects reported their percept and in the objective task we measured their sensitivity for detecting time-shifts of B signals in an ABA- sequence. As a further measure of processes underlying stream segregation we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). SAM tone parameters were chosen to evoke an integrated (1-stream), a segregated (2-stream), or an ambiguous percept by adjusting the f mod difference between A and B tones (Δf mod). The results of both psychoacoustical tasks are significantly correlated. BOLD responses in fMRI depend on Δf mod between A and B SAM tones. The effect of Δf mod, however, differs between auditory cortex and frontal regions suggesting differences in representation related to the degree of perceptual ambiguity of the sequences.</description><subject>Abscisic acid</subject><subject>amplitude modulation</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>auditory scene analysis</subject><subject>BOLD response</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Cortex (auditory)</subject><subject>Cortex (frontal)</subject><subject>Cortex (temporal)</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>temporal and spectral cues</subject><subject>time shift detection</subject><issn>1662-4548</issn><issn>1662-453X</issn><issn>1662-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhzglZ4tIDCf5cby5IVVXaSkUcAImb5bXHqcPGDrY3Us78cbxJiSgnTrZnnnk1M36b5jXBc8a6xXsXfMhzigmfY0zI4klzStqWzrhg358e77w7aV7kvMK4pR2nz5sTyhesJRKfNr-utnoYdfFhifRofYlph3JJoNcowzLBsuZiQNGhLxefUIkBavznCMFARn1lx34FpvgtIB0sisfXJu_MfdQmjrl4owdUdP6R3-2pPmkfkJ5AX3Yvm2dODxlePZxnzbePV18vb2Z3n69vLy_uZkZQVmba9FI6YMIJLlorGUhCWtFiiXu-oKLteM9k5xzFxjEhLZbEEO4Ag5W069lZc3vQtVGv1Cb5tU47FbVX-0BMS6VT7XUARTC1lErOiSWcUqeda4WxTPc9cGNN1fpw0NqM_RqsgVCSHh6JPs4Ef6-Wcas45rJjtAqcPwikWNeZi1r7bGAYdIC6MkUE5_VLmRT_gTJJpBRkUn37D7qKYwp1q4oyLDCebFIpfKBMijkncMe-CVaTsdTeWGoyltobq5a8-XveY8EfJ7HfkaXMmg</recordid><startdate>20140606</startdate><enddate>20140606</enddate><creator>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa</creator><creator>Brechmann, André</creator><creator>Klump, Georg M</creator><creator>Deike, Susann</creator><general>Frontiers Research Foundation</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140606</creationdate><title>Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity</title><author>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa ; Brechmann, André ; Klump, Georg M ; Deike, Susann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abscisic acid</topic><topic>amplitude modulation</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>auditory scene analysis</topic><topic>BOLD response</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Cortex (auditory)</topic><topic>Cortex (frontal)</topic><topic>Cortex (temporal)</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>temporal and spectral cues</topic><topic>time shift detection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brechmann, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klump, Georg M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deike, Susann</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolležal, Lena-Vanessa</au><au>Brechmann, André</au><au>Klump, Georg M</au><au>Deike, Susann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Front Neurosci</addtitle><date>2014-06-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>119</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>119-119</pages><issn>1662-4548</issn><issn>1662-453X</issn><eissn>1662-453X</eissn><abstract>Auditory stream segregation refers to a segregated percept of signal streams with different acoustic features. Different approaches have been pursued in studies of stream segregation. In psychoacoustics, stream segregation has mostly been investigated with a subjective task asking the subjects to report their percept. Few studies have applied an objective task in which stream segregation is evaluated indirectly by determining thresholds for a percept that depends on whether auditory streams are segregated or not. Furthermore, both perceptual measures and physiological measures of brain activity have been employed but only little is known about their relation. How the results from different tasks and measures are related is evaluated in the present study using examples relying on the ABA- stimulation paradigm that apply the same stimuli. We presented A and B signals that were sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones providing purely temporal, spectral or both types of cues to evaluate perceptual stream segregation and its physiological correlate. Which types of cues are most prominent was determined by the choice of carrier and modulation frequencies (f mod) of the signals. In the subjective task subjects reported their percept and in the objective task we measured their sensitivity for detecting time-shifts of B signals in an ABA- sequence. As a further measure of processes underlying stream segregation we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). SAM tone parameters were chosen to evoke an integrated (1-stream), a segregated (2-stream), or an ambiguous percept by adjusting the f mod difference between A and B tones (Δf mod). The results of both psychoacoustical tasks are significantly correlated. BOLD responses in fMRI depend on Δf mod between A and B SAM tones. The effect of Δf mod, however, differs between auditory cortex and frontal regions suggesting differences in representation related to the degree of perceptual ambiguity of the sequences.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Research Foundation</pub><pmid>24936170</pmid><doi>10.3389/fnins.2014.00119</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1662-4548 |
ispartof | Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014-06, Vol.8, p.119-119 |
issn | 1662-4548 1662-453X 1662-453X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_102d227441d1422faff65cd3abbe4cdc |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abscisic acid amplitude modulation Auditory perception auditory scene analysis BOLD response Brain mapping Cortex (auditory) Cortex (frontal) Cortex (temporal) fMRI Functional magnetic resonance imaging Hearing Measurement techniques Neuroimaging Neurosciences Perceptions Psychology Sound temporal and spectral cues time shift detection |
title | Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20auditory%20stream%20segregation%20of%20SAM%20tone%20sequences%20by%20subjective%20and%20objective%20psychoacoustical%20tasks,%20and%20brain%20activity&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20neuroscience&rft.au=Dolle%C5%BEal,%20Lena-Vanessa&rft.date=2014-06-06&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=119-119&rft.issn=1662-4548&rft.eissn=1662-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fnins.2014.00119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2305000011%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-acb77fe35f5456d73e711656070b4925684b378ff20cf357d071c14fe0ed728b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305000011&rft_id=info:pmid/24936170&rfr_iscdi=true |