Loading…
Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections
The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Designs 2024-10, Vol.8 (5), p.91 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Designs |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Palizzolo, Luigi Vazzano, Santo Benfratello, Salvatore |
description | The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/designs8050091 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1054afb9f1fc4fb0bb18e1ed1164ec41</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A814365687</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1054afb9f1fc4fb0bb18e1ed1164ec41</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A814365687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LBDEMhgdRUHSvngc8jyZtpzNzlPUTFhTUc-m06dpld6rtLOK_t7srfpBDwpvkSUiK4hThnPMOLiwlPx9SCzVAh3vFEROIVScl7P-JD4tJSgsAYBxFW_Ojonsin1belFdbQBlc-TQSLcubqFeUyg8_vpaPMYxkRrLlNAxDjnwY0klx4PQy0eTbHxcvN9fP07tq9nB7P72cVQYbxirWa0OaSw1SCO0MgUVnkaBtuYTGOCF7A6ibzuYMs70DyqWWsa61smf8uLjfcW3QC_UW_UrHTxW0V1shxLnScfRmSQqhziP6zqEzwvXQ99gSkkWUgozAzDrbsd5ieF9TGtUirOOQ11ccGch8vWYz8XxXNdcZ6gcXxqhNNkv5UmEg57N-2aLgspZt89tgYkgpkvtZE0Ft3qP-v4d_AUFGgpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120605072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Palizzolo, Luigi ; Vazzano, Santo ; Benfratello, Salvatore</creator><creatorcontrib>Palizzolo, Luigi ; Vazzano, Santo ; Benfratello, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2411-9660</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2411-9660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/designs8050091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Building, Iron and steel ; Cement ; Circular economy ; Columns (structural) ; Concrete construction ; Cross-sections ; Curves ; Design optimization ; Design standards ; dogbone ; Earthquake loads ; Earthquake resistant design ; Factories ; Finite element method ; Frame design ; I beams ; Localization ; Manufacturing ; Methods ; moment resisting connections ; multistep beam elements ; Seismic design ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic response ; Software ; Steel frames ; Steel plates ; Steel production ; Structural reliability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Designs, 2024-10, Vol.8 (5), p.91</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4735-9286 ; 0000-0003-4278-0861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3120605072/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3120605072?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palizzolo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazzano, Santo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfratello, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</title><title>Designs</title><description>The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.</description><subject>Building, Iron and steel</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Cross-sections</subject><subject>Curves</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Design standards</subject><subject>dogbone</subject><subject>Earthquake loads</subject><subject>Earthquake resistant design</subject><subject>Factories</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Frame design</subject><subject>I beams</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>moment resisting connections</subject><subject>multistep beam elements</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Steel frames</subject><subject>Steel plates</subject><subject>Steel production</subject><subject>Structural reliability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2411-9660</issn><issn>2411-9660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LBDEMhgdRUHSvngc8jyZtpzNzlPUTFhTUc-m06dpld6rtLOK_t7srfpBDwpvkSUiK4hThnPMOLiwlPx9SCzVAh3vFEROIVScl7P-JD4tJSgsAYBxFW_Ojonsin1belFdbQBlc-TQSLcubqFeUyg8_vpaPMYxkRrLlNAxDjnwY0klx4PQy0eTbHxcvN9fP07tq9nB7P72cVQYbxirWa0OaSw1SCO0MgUVnkaBtuYTGOCF7A6ibzuYMs70DyqWWsa61smf8uLjfcW3QC_UW_UrHTxW0V1shxLnScfRmSQqhziP6zqEzwvXQ99gSkkWUgozAzDrbsd5ieF9TGtUirOOQ11ccGch8vWYz8XxXNdcZ6gcXxqhNNkv5UmEg57N-2aLgspZt89tgYkgpkvtZE0Ft3qP-v4d_AUFGgpA</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Palizzolo, Luigi</creator><creator>Vazzano, Santo</creator><creator>Benfratello, Salvatore</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-9286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-0861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</title><author>Palizzolo, Luigi ; Vazzano, Santo ; Benfratello, Salvatore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Building, Iron and steel</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Cross-sections</topic><topic>Curves</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Design standards</topic><topic>dogbone</topic><topic>Earthquake loads</topic><topic>Earthquake resistant design</topic><topic>Factories</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Frame design</topic><topic>I beams</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>moment resisting connections</topic><topic>multistep beam elements</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Steel frames</topic><topic>Steel plates</topic><topic>Steel production</topic><topic>Structural reliability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palizzolo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazzano, Santo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfratello, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Designs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palizzolo, Luigi</au><au>Vazzano, Santo</au><au>Benfratello, Salvatore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</atitle><jtitle>Designs</jtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>91</spage><pages>91-</pages><issn>2411-9660</issn><eissn>2411-9660</eissn><abstract>The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/designs8050091</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-9286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-0861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2411-9660 |
ispartof | Designs, 2024-10, Vol.8 (5), p.91 |
issn | 2411-9660 2411-9660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1054afb9f1fc4fb0bb18e1ed1164ec41 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Building, Iron and steel Cement Circular economy Columns (structural) Concrete construction Cross-sections Curves Design optimization Design standards dogbone Earthquake loads Earthquake resistant design Factories Finite element method Frame design I beams Localization Manufacturing Methods moment resisting connections multistep beam elements Seismic design Seismic engineering Seismic response Software Steel frames Steel plates Steel production Structural reliability Sustainable development |
title | Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A53%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20Design%20of%20Steel%20Frames%20with%20Protected%20Connections&rft.jtitle=Designs&rft.au=Palizzolo,%20Luigi&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=91&rft.pages=91-&rft.issn=2411-9660&rft.eissn=2411-9660&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/designs8050091&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA814365687%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120605072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A814365687&rfr_iscdi=true |