Loading…

Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections

The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Designs 2024-10, Vol.8 (5), p.91
Main Authors: Palizzolo, Luigi, Vazzano, Santo, Benfratello, Salvatore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 91
container_title Designs
container_volume 8
creator Palizzolo, Luigi
Vazzano, Santo
Benfratello, Salvatore
description The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/designs8050091
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1054afb9f1fc4fb0bb18e1ed1164ec41</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A814365687</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1054afb9f1fc4fb0bb18e1ed1164ec41</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A814365687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LBDEMhgdRUHSvngc8jyZtpzNzlPUTFhTUc-m06dpld6rtLOK_t7srfpBDwpvkSUiK4hThnPMOLiwlPx9SCzVAh3vFEROIVScl7P-JD4tJSgsAYBxFW_Ojonsin1belFdbQBlc-TQSLcubqFeUyg8_vpaPMYxkRrLlNAxDjnwY0klx4PQy0eTbHxcvN9fP07tq9nB7P72cVQYbxirWa0OaSw1SCO0MgUVnkaBtuYTGOCF7A6ibzuYMs70DyqWWsa61smf8uLjfcW3QC_UW_UrHTxW0V1shxLnScfRmSQqhziP6zqEzwvXQ99gSkkWUgozAzDrbsd5ieF9TGtUirOOQ11ccGch8vWYz8XxXNdcZ6gcXxqhNNkv5UmEg57N-2aLgspZt89tgYkgpkvtZE0Ft3qP-v4d_AUFGgpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120605072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Palizzolo, Luigi ; Vazzano, Santo ; Benfratello, Salvatore</creator><creatorcontrib>Palizzolo, Luigi ; Vazzano, Santo ; Benfratello, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2411-9660</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2411-9660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/designs8050091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Building, Iron and steel ; Cement ; Circular economy ; Columns (structural) ; Concrete construction ; Cross-sections ; Curves ; Design optimization ; Design standards ; dogbone ; Earthquake loads ; Earthquake resistant design ; Factories ; Finite element method ; Frame design ; I beams ; Localization ; Manufacturing ; Methods ; moment resisting connections ; multistep beam elements ; Seismic design ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic response ; Software ; Steel frames ; Steel plates ; Steel production ; Structural reliability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Designs, 2024-10, Vol.8 (5), p.91</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4735-9286 ; 0000-0003-4278-0861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3120605072/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3120605072?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palizzolo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazzano, Santo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfratello, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</title><title>Designs</title><description>The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.</description><subject>Building, Iron and steel</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Cross-sections</subject><subject>Curves</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Design standards</subject><subject>dogbone</subject><subject>Earthquake loads</subject><subject>Earthquake resistant design</subject><subject>Factories</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Frame design</subject><subject>I beams</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>moment resisting connections</subject><subject>multistep beam elements</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Steel frames</subject><subject>Steel plates</subject><subject>Steel production</subject><subject>Structural reliability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2411-9660</issn><issn>2411-9660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LBDEMhgdRUHSvngc8jyZtpzNzlPUTFhTUc-m06dpld6rtLOK_t7srfpBDwpvkSUiK4hThnPMOLiwlPx9SCzVAh3vFEROIVScl7P-JD4tJSgsAYBxFW_Ojonsin1belFdbQBlc-TQSLcubqFeUyg8_vpaPMYxkRrLlNAxDjnwY0klx4PQy0eTbHxcvN9fP07tq9nB7P72cVQYbxirWa0OaSw1SCO0MgUVnkaBtuYTGOCF7A6ibzuYMs70DyqWWsa61smf8uLjfcW3QC_UW_UrHTxW0V1shxLnScfRmSQqhziP6zqEzwvXQ99gSkkWUgozAzDrbsd5ieF9TGtUirOOQ11ccGch8vWYz8XxXNdcZ6gcXxqhNNkv5UmEg57N-2aLgspZt89tgYkgpkvtZE0Ft3qP-v4d_AUFGgpA</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Palizzolo, Luigi</creator><creator>Vazzano, Santo</creator><creator>Benfratello, Salvatore</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-9286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-0861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</title><author>Palizzolo, Luigi ; Vazzano, Santo ; Benfratello, Salvatore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Building, Iron and steel</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Cross-sections</topic><topic>Curves</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Design standards</topic><topic>dogbone</topic><topic>Earthquake loads</topic><topic>Earthquake resistant design</topic><topic>Factories</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Frame design</topic><topic>I beams</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>moment resisting connections</topic><topic>multistep beam elements</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Steel frames</topic><topic>Steel plates</topic><topic>Steel production</topic><topic>Structural reliability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palizzolo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazzano, Santo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfratello, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Designs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palizzolo, Luigi</au><au>Vazzano, Santo</au><au>Benfratello, Salvatore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections</atitle><jtitle>Designs</jtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>91</spage><pages>91-</pages><issn>2411-9660</issn><eissn>2411-9660</eissn><abstract>The present paper is devoted to the seismic design of steel frames constituted by multistep I-shaped cross-section beam elements. The proposed design problem formulation is aimed at protecting the connections among beams and columns. In particular, reference is made to beams welded at their ends to appropriate steel plates connected by bolts to the columns. Therefore, the protection against brittle failure of the beam end sections is ensured by appropriate constraints of the optimal design problem. A useful comparison is made between the adoption of the so-called Reduced Beam Sections (RBS) and the use of multistep beam elements. In particular, the RBS approach here considered is the well-known dogbone technique consisting of reducing the width of the beam cross-sections in correspondence with suitably located beam portions, while the typical multistep beam element is constituted by a factory-made I-shaped uniform piecewise profile. To perform the necessary comparison, reference is made to a three-story, two-span plane steel frame constituted by elastic, perfectly plastic material and subjected to static and seismic loads. The load conditions and the relevant combinations have been imposed in compliance with the Italian structural code. The frame is first studied as constituted by European standard steel profiles on sale, and the related design is obtained using the optimization tool contained in SAP2000 software. A linear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the response of the frame. Later, the same frame, either equipped with dogbone and constituted by multistep beam elements, subjected to serviceability load conditions, is studied in terms of inter-story drifts and beam deflections. The geometry of the multistep beam elements is obtained by the solution to the proposed optimization problem. Furthermore, a nonlinear static analysis is performed to evaluate the capacity curves of the same frames. The results obtained for the frames equipped with the described different devices, compared with those related to the original frame, provide very interesting information on the sensitivity of the seismic response of the structure, showing the full reliability of the multistep beam element approach.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/designs8050091</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-9286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-0861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2411-9660
ispartof Designs, 2024-10, Vol.8 (5), p.91
issn 2411-9660
2411-9660
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1054afb9f1fc4fb0bb18e1ed1164ec41
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Building, Iron and steel
Cement
Circular economy
Columns (structural)
Concrete construction
Cross-sections
Curves
Design optimization
Design standards
dogbone
Earthquake loads
Earthquake resistant design
Factories
Finite element method
Frame design
I beams
Localization
Manufacturing
Methods
moment resisting connections
multistep beam elements
Seismic design
Seismic engineering
Seismic response
Software
Steel frames
Steel plates
Steel production
Structural reliability
Sustainable development
title Seismic Design of Steel Frames with Protected Connections
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A53%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20Design%20of%20Steel%20Frames%20with%20Protected%20Connections&rft.jtitle=Designs&rft.au=Palizzolo,%20Luigi&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=91&rft.pages=91-&rft.issn=2411-9660&rft.eissn=2411-9660&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/designs8050091&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA814365687%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-2bacea36a0644afce0d1fd1e0883607cf46bc01a79d0d12dbf0e064d2298d6b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120605072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A814365687&rfr_iscdi=true