Loading…

Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes

Reaching climate goals depends on appropriate and accurate methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes and to verify that efforts to mitigate GHG emissions are effective. We here highlight critical advantages, limitations, and needs regarding GHG flux measurement methods, identified from an anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental research letters 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.104009
Main Authors: Bastviken, David, Wilk, Julie, Duc, Nguyen Thanh, Gålfalk, Magnus, Karlson, Martin, Neset, Tina-Simone, Opach, Tomasz, Enrich-Prast, Alex, Sundgren, Ingrid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 104009
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 17
creator Bastviken, David
Wilk, Julie
Duc, Nguyen Thanh
Gålfalk, Magnus
Karlson, Martin
Neset, Tina-Simone
Opach, Tomasz
Enrich-Prast, Alex
Sundgren, Ingrid
description Reaching climate goals depends on appropriate and accurate methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes and to verify that efforts to mitigate GHG emissions are effective. We here highlight critical advantages, limitations, and needs regarding GHG flux measurement methods, identified from an analysis of >13 500 scientific publications regarding three long-lived GHGs, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). While existing methods are well-suited for assessing atmospheric changes and local fluxes, they are expensive and have limited accessibility. Further, we are typically forced to choose between methods for very local GHG sources and sinks and their regulation (m 2 -scaled measurements), or methods for aggregated net fluxes at >ha or km 2 scales measurements. The results highlight the key need of accessible and affordable GHG flux measurement methods for the many flux types not quantifiable from fossil fuel use, to better verify inventories and mitigation efforts for transparency and accountability under the Paris agreement. The situation also calls for novel methods, capable of quantifying large scale GHG flux patterns while simultaneously distinguishing local source and sink dynamics and reveal flux regulation, representing key knowledge for quantitative GHG flux modeling. Possible strategies to address the identified GHG flux measurement method needs are discussed. The analysis also generated indications of how GHG flux measurements have been distributed geographically and across flux types, which are reported.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10b0ce0e40a241e38715565db4141612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_10b0ce0e40a241e38715565db4141612</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2716280091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhosoqKt3jwUvHqzOtGmTPcr6CYIX9RrSZrKbpTY12aL-e7NW_AA9ZTI87wMzkyQHCCcIQpwiZyKbFnl1qhph1HQj2flqbf6ot5PdEJYAJSu52EnEzNuVbVSbPtFq4XTaEemQ2i7-VRi87ebp3BN1CzcESucqpKYdXinsJVtGtYH2P99J8nB5cT-7zm7vrm5mZ7dZwwRfZZxYrrkR2FBemFqDKjWKvNTUqApJaU7AsUZdNYYXqgDQXBkSBAYZN1BMkpvRq51ayt7bJ-XfpFNWfjScn0vl4wQtSYQaGgJioHKGVAiOZVmVumbIsMI8urLRFV6oH-pftnP7ePZha-0gUQheFZE_HPneu-eBwkou3eC7OK7MOVa5AJhipGCkGu9C8GS-vAhyfRu5Xr5cL1-Ot4mRozFiXf_tJN9GdEyxqJa9NhE9_gP91_wOPR2c2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716280091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bastviken, David ; Wilk, Julie ; Duc, Nguyen Thanh ; Gålfalk, Magnus ; Karlson, Martin ; Neset, Tina-Simone ; Opach, Tomasz ; Enrich-Prast, Alex ; Sundgren, Ingrid</creator><creatorcontrib>Bastviken, David ; Wilk, Julie ; Duc, Nguyen Thanh ; Gålfalk, Magnus ; Karlson, Martin ; Neset, Tina-Simone ; Opach, Tomasz ; Enrich-Prast, Alex ; Sundgren, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><description>Reaching climate goals depends on appropriate and accurate methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes and to verify that efforts to mitigate GHG emissions are effective. We here highlight critical advantages, limitations, and needs regarding GHG flux measurement methods, identified from an analysis of &gt;13 500 scientific publications regarding three long-lived GHGs, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). While existing methods are well-suited for assessing atmospheric changes and local fluxes, they are expensive and have limited accessibility. Further, we are typically forced to choose between methods for very local GHG sources and sinks and their regulation (m 2 -scaled measurements), or methods for aggregated net fluxes at &gt;ha or km 2 scales measurements. The results highlight the key need of accessible and affordable GHG flux measurement methods for the many flux types not quantifiable from fossil fuel use, to better verify inventories and mitigation efforts for transparency and accountability under the Paris agreement. The situation also calls for novel methods, capable of quantifying large scale GHG flux patterns while simultaneously distinguishing local source and sink dynamics and reveal flux regulation, representing key knowledge for quantitative GHG flux modeling. Possible strategies to address the identified GHG flux measurement method needs are discussed. The analysis also generated indications of how GHG flux measurements have been distributed geographically and across flux types, which are reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Carbon dioxide ; climate change ; Emissions ; Fluctuations ; flux ; Fluxes ; Fossil fuels ; Geographical distribution ; Greenhouse effect ; greenhouse gas ; Greenhouse gases ; Knowledge representation ; Measurement methods ; Methane ; methods ; mitigation ; Nitrous oxide ; Paris Agreement ; Scientific papers ; verification</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.104009</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1151-9943 ; 0000-0003-0038-2152</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2716280091?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-188763$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bastviken, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilk, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duc, Nguyen Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gålfalk, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlson, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neset, Tina-Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opach, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enrich-Prast, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundgren, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><title>Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Reaching climate goals depends on appropriate and accurate methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes and to verify that efforts to mitigate GHG emissions are effective. We here highlight critical advantages, limitations, and needs regarding GHG flux measurement methods, identified from an analysis of &gt;13 500 scientific publications regarding three long-lived GHGs, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). While existing methods are well-suited for assessing atmospheric changes and local fluxes, they are expensive and have limited accessibility. Further, we are typically forced to choose between methods for very local GHG sources and sinks and their regulation (m 2 -scaled measurements), or methods for aggregated net fluxes at &gt;ha or km 2 scales measurements. The results highlight the key need of accessible and affordable GHG flux measurement methods for the many flux types not quantifiable from fossil fuel use, to better verify inventories and mitigation efforts for transparency and accountability under the Paris agreement. The situation also calls for novel methods, capable of quantifying large scale GHG flux patterns while simultaneously distinguishing local source and sink dynamics and reveal flux regulation, representing key knowledge for quantitative GHG flux modeling. Possible strategies to address the identified GHG flux measurement method needs are discussed. The analysis also generated indications of how GHG flux measurements have been distributed geographically and across flux types, which are reported.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>flux</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>greenhouse gas</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>mitigation</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Scientific papers</subject><subject>verification</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhosoqKt3jwUvHqzOtGmTPcr6CYIX9RrSZrKbpTY12aL-e7NW_AA9ZTI87wMzkyQHCCcIQpwiZyKbFnl1qhph1HQj2flqbf6ot5PdEJYAJSu52EnEzNuVbVSbPtFq4XTaEemQ2i7-VRi87ebp3BN1CzcESucqpKYdXinsJVtGtYH2P99J8nB5cT-7zm7vrm5mZ7dZwwRfZZxYrrkR2FBemFqDKjWKvNTUqApJaU7AsUZdNYYXqgDQXBkSBAYZN1BMkpvRq51ayt7bJ-XfpFNWfjScn0vl4wQtSYQaGgJioHKGVAiOZVmVumbIsMI8urLRFV6oH-pftnP7ePZha-0gUQheFZE_HPneu-eBwkou3eC7OK7MOVa5AJhipGCkGu9C8GS-vAhyfRu5Xr5cL1-Ot4mRozFiXf_tJN9GdEyxqJa9NhE9_gP91_wOPR2c2Q</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Bastviken, David</creator><creator>Wilk, Julie</creator><creator>Duc, Nguyen Thanh</creator><creator>Gålfalk, Magnus</creator><creator>Karlson, Martin</creator><creator>Neset, Tina-Simone</creator><creator>Opach, Tomasz</creator><creator>Enrich-Prast, Alex</creator><creator>Sundgren, Ingrid</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>ABXSW</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG8</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-9943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-2152</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes</title><author>Bastviken, David ; Wilk, Julie ; Duc, Nguyen Thanh ; Gålfalk, Magnus ; Karlson, Martin ; Neset, Tina-Simone ; Opach, Tomasz ; Enrich-Prast, Alex ; Sundgren, Ingrid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>flux</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>greenhouse gas</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>mitigation</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Scientific papers</topic><topic>verification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bastviken, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilk, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duc, Nguyen Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gålfalk, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlson, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neset, Tina-Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opach, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enrich-Prast, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundgren, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bastviken, David</au><au>Wilk, Julie</au><au>Duc, Nguyen Thanh</au><au>Gålfalk, Magnus</au><au>Karlson, Martin</au><au>Neset, Tina-Simone</au><au>Opach, Tomasz</au><au>Enrich-Prast, Alex</au><au>Sundgren, Ingrid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>104009</spage><pages>104009-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Reaching climate goals depends on appropriate and accurate methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes and to verify that efforts to mitigate GHG emissions are effective. We here highlight critical advantages, limitations, and needs regarding GHG flux measurement methods, identified from an analysis of &gt;13 500 scientific publications regarding three long-lived GHGs, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). While existing methods are well-suited for assessing atmospheric changes and local fluxes, they are expensive and have limited accessibility. Further, we are typically forced to choose between methods for very local GHG sources and sinks and their regulation (m 2 -scaled measurements), or methods for aggregated net fluxes at &gt;ha or km 2 scales measurements. The results highlight the key need of accessible and affordable GHG flux measurement methods for the many flux types not quantifiable from fossil fuel use, to better verify inventories and mitigation efforts for transparency and accountability under the Paris agreement. The situation also calls for novel methods, capable of quantifying large scale GHG flux patterns while simultaneously distinguishing local source and sink dynamics and reveal flux regulation, representing key knowledge for quantitative GHG flux modeling. Possible strategies to address the identified GHG flux measurement method needs are discussed. The analysis also generated indications of how GHG flux measurements have been distributed geographically and across flux types, which are reported.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-9943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-2152</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.104009
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10b0ce0e40a241e38715565db4141612
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Accessibility
Carbon dioxide
climate change
Emissions
Fluctuations
flux
Fluxes
Fossil fuels
Geographical distribution
Greenhouse effect
greenhouse gas
Greenhouse gases
Knowledge representation
Measurement methods
Methane
methods
mitigation
Nitrous oxide
Paris Agreement
Scientific papers
verification
title Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A56%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20method%20needs%20in%20measuring%20greenhouse%20gas%20fluxes&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Bastviken,%20David&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=104009&rft.pages=104009-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2716280091%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7e42d7f81ce23fbd0a5d1825deca61ead7e071b1d6cf73a300d7afe8e0f147f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716280091&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true