Path Reinforcer or Policy Accelerator? COVID-19 and Scandinavian Social Protection Reform Trajectories

A pandemic may change the use of social protection systems. In this article, we compare Scandinavian reform trajectories of unemployment benefits and sickness benefits following the COVID-19 pandemic. From an institutional theory perspective, we have analyzed official documents on regulations propos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nordic journal of working life studies 2024-05, p.1
Main Authors: Bengtsson, Mattias, Høgedahl, Laust, Svalund, Jørgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arbetslivsstudier
COVID-19 / employees / institutional theory / Scandinavia / sickness benefits / unemployment benefits
Employment, Wages, Unemployment & Rehabilitation
Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners
Sociologi
Sociology
Work Sciences
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A pandemic may change the use of social protection systems. In this article, we compare Scandinavian reform trajectories of unemployment benefits and sickness benefits following the COVID-19 pandemic. From an institutional theory perspective, we have analyzed official documents on regulations proposed in government bills, public inquiries, reports, and secondary literature published between March 2020 and December 2023, as well as interview data from key actors representing the state, the social partners, and related stakeholder organizations. The findings show that Denmark and Norway implemented mostly provisional reforms and thus ended in path reinforcement. In Sweden, on the contrary, numerous provisional reforms during the pandemic turned out to become permanent in the post-pandemic period. As the pandemic legitimized permanent changes that in some cases had been debated for a long time in Sweden, it thus came to act as a path-clearing policy accelerator.
ISSN:2245-0157
2245-0157
DOI:10.18291/njwls.145479