Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy

Objective: There is no correlation between the preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) sensitivity test and the results of the renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 129 patients who underwent f-URS included the study. Preoperatively, PBUC was collected in all ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of urological surgery 2022-09, Vol.9 (3), p.172-179
Main Authors: Gokalp, Fatih, Koras, Omer, Polat, Salih, Sahan, Murat, Eker, Anil, Baba, Dursun, Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
bladder urine culture
Complications
Complications and side effects
Microbiology
Prevention
renal pelvic urine culture
rirs
Risk factors
Sepsis
Surgery
Ureteroscopy
Urine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-34030621d28dd6926b240e3b537016dcc23f050f87acf3c23e11e71c9e55e5343
container_end_page 179
container_issue 3
container_start_page 172
container_title Journal of urological surgery
container_volume 9
creator Gokalp, Fatih
Koras, Omer
Polat, Salih
Sahan, Murat
Eker, Anil
Baba, Dursun
Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil
description Objective: There is no correlation between the preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) sensitivity test and the results of the renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 129 patients who underwent f-URS included the study. Preoperatively, PBUC was collected in all cases, and RPUC was taken when starting the surgery. Results: In PBUC, there was growth in 25 (19.4%) patients and in RPUC, there were only in 35 (27.1%) cases. Preoperative tomographic urine density at the renal pelvis [odds ratio (OR): 0.848, p
doi_str_mv 10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2021.0129
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10eb74f86f8e467cbe46a1b0aad6b285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A719645113</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_10eb74f86f8e467cbe46a1b0aad6b285</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A719645113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-34030621d28dd6926b240e3b537016dcc23f050f87acf3c23e11e71c9e55e5343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkW9rHCEQxpfSQEOa7yDt69s66q67eReOpD0I9Cg5-lJcHVOPPT10L2ne94PX7YX8gSKMzvjM4-Cvqj4BrQWT4sv2kOs7PWKIuWaUsTlATYH176pTBqJb9E1H3786f6jOc95SSkHyDiQ7rf4s426vk88xkOjIOmHcY9KTv0eyST4gWR7G6ZCQ6GDJKkxJvwh-YNAjWeN47_OzzgeyLtcYpkx-_opkEyymh5KS6xF_-2GcjXHCFNM8uYn7x4_VidNjxvOn_azaXF_dLr8tbr5_XS0vbxaGM5gWXFBOWwaWdda2PWsHJijyoeGSQmuNYdzRhrpOauN4yRAAJZgemwYbLvhZtTr62qi3ap_8TqdHFbVX_wox3SmdJm9GVEBxkMJ1retQtNIMJWoYqNa2PNs1xevz0WsmoHxwsXyN2fls1KWEvhUNAC-q-j-qsizuvIkBnS_1Nw0XxwaTYs4J3fOYQNVMXRXq6om6mqnPAdRMnf8FVuWk8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Gokalp, Fatih ; Koras, Omer ; Polat, Salih ; Sahan, Murat ; Eker, Anil ; Baba, Dursun ; Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</creator><creatorcontrib>Gokalp, Fatih ; Koras, Omer ; Polat, Salih ; Sahan, Murat ; Eker, Anil ; Baba, Dursun ; Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: There is no correlation between the preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) sensitivity test and the results of the renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 129 patients who underwent f-URS included the study. Preoperatively, PBUC was collected in all cases, and RPUC was taken when starting the surgery. Results: In PBUC, there was growth in 25 (19.4%) patients and in RPUC, there were only in 35 (27.1%) cases. Preoperative tomographic urine density at the renal pelvis [odds ratio (OR): 0.848, p&lt;0.001], grade [greater than or equal to]2 hydronephrosis (OR: 18.970, p=0.001), and lower calyceal stone location (OR: 0.033, p=0.017) were determined as independent predictive factors for RPUC growth. The ability of tomographic urine density to foresee positive RPUC positivity was determined to be 0.858 (0.780-0.936). The tomographic urine density threshold for RPUC positivity prediction was 4.5, with 80% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity. Conclusion: PBUCs do not necessarily mean accurate colonization. Obtaining renal pelvis urine samples is important for managing postoperative infectious complications. Patients that have preoperative hydronephrosis and nominal tomographic urine density could develop RPUC even if the preoperative bladder urine samples are negative. Keywords: Bladder urine culture, Renal pelvic urine culture, RIRS</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-9580</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-9580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2021.0129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; bladder urine culture ; Complications ; Complications and side effects ; Microbiology ; Prevention ; renal pelvic urine culture ; rirs ; Risk factors ; Sepsis ; Surgery ; Ureteroscopy ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Journal of urological surgery, 2022-09, Vol.9 (3), p.172-179</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-34030621d28dd6926b240e3b537016dcc23f050f87acf3c23e11e71c9e55e5343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7580-6872 ; 0000-0002-4779-6777 ; 0000-0001-9749-5254 ; 0000-0003-1268-5636 ; 0000-0003-1603-3336 ; 0000-0003-3099-3317 ; 0000-0002-0065-4245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gokalp, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koras, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Salih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahan, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eker, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baba, Dursun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy</title><title>Journal of urological surgery</title><description>Objective: There is no correlation between the preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) sensitivity test and the results of the renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 129 patients who underwent f-URS included the study. Preoperatively, PBUC was collected in all cases, and RPUC was taken when starting the surgery. Results: In PBUC, there was growth in 25 (19.4%) patients and in RPUC, there were only in 35 (27.1%) cases. Preoperative tomographic urine density at the renal pelvis [odds ratio (OR): 0.848, p&lt;0.001], grade [greater than or equal to]2 hydronephrosis (OR: 18.970, p=0.001), and lower calyceal stone location (OR: 0.033, p=0.017) were determined as independent predictive factors for RPUC growth. The ability of tomographic urine density to foresee positive RPUC positivity was determined to be 0.858 (0.780-0.936). The tomographic urine density threshold for RPUC positivity prediction was 4.5, with 80% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity. Conclusion: PBUCs do not necessarily mean accurate colonization. Obtaining renal pelvis urine samples is important for managing postoperative infectious complications. Patients that have preoperative hydronephrosis and nominal tomographic urine density could develop RPUC even if the preoperative bladder urine samples are negative. Keywords: Bladder urine culture, Renal pelvic urine culture, RIRS</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>bladder urine culture</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>renal pelvic urine culture</subject><subject>rirs</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ureteroscopy</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>2148-9580</issn><issn>2148-9580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkW9rHCEQxpfSQEOa7yDt69s66q67eReOpD0I9Cg5-lJcHVOPPT10L2ne94PX7YX8gSKMzvjM4-Cvqj4BrQWT4sv2kOs7PWKIuWaUsTlATYH176pTBqJb9E1H3786f6jOc95SSkHyDiQ7rf4s426vk88xkOjIOmHcY9KTv0eyST4gWR7G6ZCQ6GDJKkxJvwh-YNAjWeN47_OzzgeyLtcYpkx-_opkEyymh5KS6xF_-2GcjXHCFNM8uYn7x4_VidNjxvOn_azaXF_dLr8tbr5_XS0vbxaGM5gWXFBOWwaWdda2PWsHJijyoeGSQmuNYdzRhrpOauN4yRAAJZgemwYbLvhZtTr62qi3ap_8TqdHFbVX_wox3SmdJm9GVEBxkMJ1retQtNIMJWoYqNa2PNs1xevz0WsmoHxwsXyN2fls1KWEvhUNAC-q-j-qsizuvIkBnS_1Nw0XxwaTYs4J3fOYQNVMXRXq6om6mqnPAdRMnf8FVuWk8w</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Gokalp, Fatih</creator><creator>Koras, Omer</creator><creator>Polat, Salih</creator><creator>Sahan, Murat</creator><creator>Eker, Anil</creator><creator>Baba, Dursun</creator><creator>Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</creator><general>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</general><general>Galenos Yayinevi</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-6872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-6777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-5254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-5636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-3336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-3317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0065-4245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy</title><author>Gokalp, Fatih ; Koras, Omer ; Polat, Salih ; Sahan, Murat ; Eker, Anil ; Baba, Dursun ; Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-34030621d28dd6926b240e3b537016dcc23f050f87acf3c23e11e71c9e55e5343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>bladder urine culture</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>renal pelvic urine culture</topic><topic>rirs</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ureteroscopy</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gokalp, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koras, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Salih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahan, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eker, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baba, Dursun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of urological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gokalp, Fatih</au><au>Koras, Omer</au><au>Polat, Salih</au><au>Sahan, Murat</au><au>Eker, Anil</au><au>Baba, Dursun</au><au>Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urological surgery</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>172-179</pages><issn>2148-9580</issn><eissn>2148-9580</eissn><abstract>Objective: There is no correlation between the preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) sensitivity test and the results of the renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 129 patients who underwent f-URS included the study. Preoperatively, PBUC was collected in all cases, and RPUC was taken when starting the surgery. Results: In PBUC, there was growth in 25 (19.4%) patients and in RPUC, there were only in 35 (27.1%) cases. Preoperative tomographic urine density at the renal pelvis [odds ratio (OR): 0.848, p&lt;0.001], grade [greater than or equal to]2 hydronephrosis (OR: 18.970, p=0.001), and lower calyceal stone location (OR: 0.033, p=0.017) were determined as independent predictive factors for RPUC growth. The ability of tomographic urine density to foresee positive RPUC positivity was determined to be 0.858 (0.780-0.936). The tomographic urine density threshold for RPUC positivity prediction was 4.5, with 80% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity. Conclusion: PBUCs do not necessarily mean accurate colonization. Obtaining renal pelvis urine samples is important for managing postoperative infectious complications. Patients that have preoperative hydronephrosis and nominal tomographic urine density could develop RPUC even if the preoperative bladder urine samples are negative. Keywords: Bladder urine culture, Renal pelvic urine culture, RIRS</abstract><pub>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2021.0129</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-6872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-6777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-5254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-5636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-3336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-3317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0065-4245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2148-9580
ispartof Journal of urological surgery, 2022-09, Vol.9 (3), p.172-179
issn 2148-9580
2148-9580
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10eb74f86f8e467cbe46a1b0aad6b285
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Analysis
bladder urine culture
Complications
Complications and side effects
Microbiology
Prevention
renal pelvic urine culture
rirs
Risk factors
Sepsis
Surgery
Ureteroscopy
Urine
title Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Preoperative%20Urine%20Culture%20and%20Intraoperative%20Renal%20Pelvis%20Culture%20in%20Patients%20Who%20Underwent%20Flexible%20Ureterorenoscopy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urological%20surgery&rft.au=Gokalp,%20Fatih&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=172-179&rft.issn=2148-9580&rft.eissn=2148-9580&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2021.0129&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA719645113%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-34030621d28dd6926b240e3b537016dcc23f050f87acf3c23e11e71c9e55e5343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A719645113&rfr_iscdi=true