Loading…
In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study
The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process. This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Dental press journal of orthodontics 2021, Vol.26 (5), p.e2119353-e2119353 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3 |
container_end_page | e2119353 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e2119353 |
container_title | Dental press journal of orthodontics |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz Carneiro, Érika Lopes Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa Senna, Lilian Sampaio-Filho, Helio Miguel, José Augusto Mendes |
description | The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process.
This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers.
Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes).
Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers.
Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10f6191fe412422fa6496385d9ff6ed7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S2176_94512021000500306</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_10f6191fe412422fa6496385d9ff6ed7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2672325982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUl1rFDEUHUSxpfYvSMAXX2bMxySZKAhSbF0o-KA-h2xy080yOxmTmZX668102sUGQi6595wcTk5VvSO4IVzhD5RIWQuJVUNFwxughCjGWRNNelGdn7ovH2pRq5aTs-oy5z0uiyncKva6OmNctBhLdV792QzoGKYUkY2H0aSQ44CiRyMkY2EKFhkbHDJD2fMUbW-OgPIEKfThr5lCmQ4DmnZQ8CnFHFZ4TNMuujgsBGMfIOWPyKAx9HEq6Nndv6leedNnuHw8L6pf119_Xn2rb7_fbK6-3NaWKZJqaRlYJagT0AHmhBOFFVed6dgWu85zIzopvWhtKazdWlAOWt4R7BgGb9hFtVl5XTR7PaZwMOleRxP0w0VMd9qkorIHTbAXRBEPLaEtpd6IVgnWcae8F-Bk4WpWrmwD9FHv45yGIl7_WLzWi9cUU1KM5sVrLArg8woY5-0BnIVhSqZ_puJ5Zwg7fRePuuNSdIIUgvePBCn-niFP-hCyhb43A8Q5ayokZbT4Qcvop3XUll_ICfzpGYL1Eh29hEMv4SgwzfVTdIqMVNBv_1d6wj4Fhf0DGe3BUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672325982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>SciELO Brazil</source><creator>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz ; Carneiro, Érika Lopes ; Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa ; Senna, Lilian ; Sampaio-Filho, Helio ; Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz ; Carneiro, Érika Lopes ; Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa ; Senna, Lilian ; Sampaio-Filho, Helio ; Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><description>The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process.
This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers.
Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes).
Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers.
Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2176-9451</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2177-6709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2177-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35640079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Dental Press International</publisher><subject>Autoclave ; Caustics ; Corrosion ; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE ; Original ; Peracetic Acid ; Pilot Projects ; Sterilization ; Sterilization - methods</subject><ispartof>Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2021, Vol.26 (5), p.e2119353-e2119353</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1310-1161 ; 0000-0002-6334-2281 ; 0000-0003-4264-9118 ; 0000-0002-6329-9439 ; 0000-0002-6316-6687 ; 0000-0001-5315-663X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576861/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576861/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,24150,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senna, Lilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</title><title>Dental press journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Dental Press J Orthod</addtitle><description>The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process.
This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers.
Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes).
Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers.
Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.</description><subject>Autoclave</subject><subject>Caustics</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Peracetic Acid</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Sterilization - methods</subject><issn>2176-9451</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUl1rFDEUHUSxpfYvSMAXX2bMxySZKAhSbF0o-KA-h2xy080yOxmTmZX668102sUGQi6595wcTk5VvSO4IVzhD5RIWQuJVUNFwxughCjGWRNNelGdn7ovH2pRq5aTs-oy5z0uiyncKva6OmNctBhLdV792QzoGKYUkY2H0aSQ44CiRyMkY2EKFhkbHDJD2fMUbW-OgPIEKfThr5lCmQ4DmnZQ8CnFHFZ4TNMuujgsBGMfIOWPyKAx9HEq6Nndv6leedNnuHw8L6pf119_Xn2rb7_fbK6-3NaWKZJqaRlYJagT0AHmhBOFFVed6dgWu85zIzopvWhtKazdWlAOWt4R7BgGb9hFtVl5XTR7PaZwMOleRxP0w0VMd9qkorIHTbAXRBEPLaEtpd6IVgnWcae8F-Bk4WpWrmwD9FHv45yGIl7_WLzWi9cUU1KM5sVrLArg8woY5-0BnIVhSqZ_puJ5Zwg7fRePuuNSdIIUgvePBCn-niFP-hCyhb43A8Q5ayokZbT4Qcvop3XUll_ICfzpGYL1Eh29hEMv4SgwzfVTdIqMVNBv_1d6wj4Fhf0DGe3BUA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</creator><creator>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</creator><creator>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</creator><creator>Senna, Lilian</creator><creator>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</creator><creator>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creator><general>Dental Press International</general><general>Dental Press Editora</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-1161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-2281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-9118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6329-9439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-6687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5315-663X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</title><author>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz ; Carneiro, Érika Lopes ; Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa ; Senna, Lilian ; Sampaio-Filho, Helio ; Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Autoclave</topic><topic>Caustics</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Peracetic Acid</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Sterilization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senna, Lilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Dental press journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</au><au>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</au><au>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</au><au>Senna, Lilian</au><au>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</au><au>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Dental press journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Dental Press J Orthod</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2119353</spage><epage>e2119353</epage><pages>e2119353-e2119353</pages><issn>2176-9451</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><eissn>2177-6709</eissn><abstract>The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process.
This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers.
Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes).
Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers.
Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Dental Press International</pub><pmid>35640079</pmid><doi>10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-1161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-2281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-9118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6329-9439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-6687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5315-663X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2176-9451 |
ispartof | Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2021, Vol.26 (5), p.e2119353-e2119353 |
issn | 2176-9451 2177-6709 2177-6709 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10f6191fe412422fa6496385d9ff6ed7 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); SciELO Brazil |
subjects | Autoclave Caustics Corrosion DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Original Peracetic Acid Pilot Projects Sterilization Sterilization - methods |
title | In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20comparison%20of%20peracetic%20acid%20and%20autoclave%20sterilization%20in%20the%20corrosion%20of%20orthodontic%20pliers:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20press%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Nunes,%20Livia%20Kelly%20Ferraz&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2119353&rft.epage=e2119353&rft.pages=e2119353-e2119353&rft.issn=2176-9451&rft.eissn=2177-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2672325982%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672325982&rft_id=info:pmid/35640079&rft_scielo_id=S2176_94512021000500306&rfr_iscdi=true |