Loading…

In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study

The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process. This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dental press journal of orthodontics 2021, Vol.26 (5), p.e2119353-e2119353
Main Authors: Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz, Carneiro, Érika Lopes, Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa, Senna, Lilian, Sampaio-Filho, Helio, Miguel, José Augusto Mendes
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3
container_end_page e2119353
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2119353
container_title Dental press journal of orthodontics
container_volume 26
creator Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz
Carneiro, Érika Lopes
Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa
Senna, Lilian
Sampaio-Filho, Helio
Miguel, José Augusto Mendes
description The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process. This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers. Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes). Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers. Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10f6191fe412422fa6496385d9ff6ed7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S2176_94512021000500306</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_10f6191fe412422fa6496385d9ff6ed7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2672325982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUl1rFDEUHUSxpfYvSMAXX2bMxySZKAhSbF0o-KA-h2xy080yOxmTmZX668102sUGQi6595wcTk5VvSO4IVzhD5RIWQuJVUNFwxughCjGWRNNelGdn7ovH2pRq5aTs-oy5z0uiyncKva6OmNctBhLdV792QzoGKYUkY2H0aSQ44CiRyMkY2EKFhkbHDJD2fMUbW-OgPIEKfThr5lCmQ4DmnZQ8CnFHFZ4TNMuujgsBGMfIOWPyKAx9HEq6Nndv6leedNnuHw8L6pf119_Xn2rb7_fbK6-3NaWKZJqaRlYJagT0AHmhBOFFVed6dgWu85zIzopvWhtKazdWlAOWt4R7BgGb9hFtVl5XTR7PaZwMOleRxP0w0VMd9qkorIHTbAXRBEPLaEtpd6IVgnWcae8F-Bk4WpWrmwD9FHv45yGIl7_WLzWi9cUU1KM5sVrLArg8woY5-0BnIVhSqZ_puJ5Zwg7fRePuuNSdIIUgvePBCn-niFP-hCyhb43A8Q5ayokZbT4Qcvop3XUll_ICfzpGYL1Eh29hEMv4SgwzfVTdIqMVNBv_1d6wj4Fhf0DGe3BUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672325982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>SciELO Brazil</source><creator>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz ; Carneiro, Érika Lopes ; Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa ; Senna, Lilian ; Sampaio-Filho, Helio ; Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz ; Carneiro, Érika Lopes ; Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa ; Senna, Lilian ; Sampaio-Filho, Helio ; Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><description>The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process. This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers. Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes). Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers. Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2176-9451</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2177-6709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2177-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35640079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Dental Press International</publisher><subject>Autoclave ; Caustics ; Corrosion ; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY &amp; MEDICINE ; Original ; Peracetic Acid ; Pilot Projects ; Sterilization ; Sterilization - methods</subject><ispartof>Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2021, Vol.26 (5), p.e2119353-e2119353</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1310-1161 ; 0000-0002-6334-2281 ; 0000-0003-4264-9118 ; 0000-0002-6329-9439 ; 0000-0002-6316-6687 ; 0000-0001-5315-663X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576861/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576861/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,24150,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senna, Lilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</title><title>Dental press journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Dental Press J Orthod</addtitle><description>The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process. This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers. Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes). Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers. Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.</description><subject>Autoclave</subject><subject>Caustics</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY &amp; MEDICINE</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Peracetic Acid</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Sterilization - methods</subject><issn>2176-9451</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUl1rFDEUHUSxpfYvSMAXX2bMxySZKAhSbF0o-KA-h2xy080yOxmTmZX668102sUGQi6595wcTk5VvSO4IVzhD5RIWQuJVUNFwxughCjGWRNNelGdn7ovH2pRq5aTs-oy5z0uiyncKva6OmNctBhLdV792QzoGKYUkY2H0aSQ44CiRyMkY2EKFhkbHDJD2fMUbW-OgPIEKfThr5lCmQ4DmnZQ8CnFHFZ4TNMuujgsBGMfIOWPyKAx9HEq6Nndv6leedNnuHw8L6pf119_Xn2rb7_fbK6-3NaWKZJqaRlYJagT0AHmhBOFFVed6dgWu85zIzopvWhtKazdWlAOWt4R7BgGb9hFtVl5XTR7PaZwMOleRxP0w0VMd9qkorIHTbAXRBEPLaEtpd6IVgnWcae8F-Bk4WpWrmwD9FHv45yGIl7_WLzWi9cUU1KM5sVrLArg8woY5-0BnIVhSqZ_puJ5Zwg7fRePuuNSdIIUgvePBCn-niFP-hCyhb43A8Q5ayokZbT4Qcvop3XUll_ICfzpGYL1Eh29hEMv4SgwzfVTdIqMVNBv_1d6wj4Fhf0DGe3BUA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</creator><creator>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</creator><creator>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</creator><creator>Senna, Lilian</creator><creator>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</creator><creator>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creator><general>Dental Press International</general><general>Dental Press Editora</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-1161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-2281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-9118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6329-9439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-6687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5315-663X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</title><author>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz ; Carneiro, Érika Lopes ; Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa ; Senna, Lilian ; Sampaio-Filho, Helio ; Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Autoclave</topic><topic>Caustics</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY &amp; MEDICINE</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Peracetic Acid</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Sterilization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senna, Lilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Dental press journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunes, Livia Kelly Ferraz</au><au>Carneiro, Érika Lopes</au><au>Palomares, Nathalia Barbosa</au><au>Senna, Lilian</au><au>Sampaio-Filho, Helio</au><au>Miguel, José Augusto Mendes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Dental press journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Dental Press J Orthod</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2119353</spage><epage>e2119353</epage><pages>e2119353-e2119353</pages><issn>2176-9451</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><eissn>2177-6709</eissn><abstract>The most currently recommended method for sterilization of orthodontic pliers is the autoclave, while peracetic acid has also been shown to be effective in the chemical sterilization process. This study sought to compare the corrosive effects of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization process of orthodontic pliers. Four active tungsten carbide (WC) stainless steel tie-cutting pliers from the manufacturers Quinelato (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) and ICE (Cajamar, SP, Brazil) were selected. The active ends of the pliers were sectioned, and six active tips were obtained and distributed into the following groups: 1) control group (no sterilization); 2) AC group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 autoclave sterilization cycles); and 3) AP group (two active pliers tips submitted to 100 cycles of sterilization by immersion in 2% peracetic acid solution for 30 minutes). Chemical analysis using X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed that after autoclave sterilization, only the ICE pliers presented oxidation corrosion (Δ[O] = +24.5%; Δ[Fe] = +5.8%; Δ[WC] = -1.9%). In comparison, following peracetic acid sterilization, both manufacturers ICE (Δ[O] = +1.8%; Δ[Fe] = +18.0%; Δ[WC] = -1.1%) and Quinelato (Δ[O] = +5.3%; Δ[Fe] = -10.4%; Δ[WC] = -15.2%) showed corrosion. The morphological analysis revealed that peracetic acid caused a pitting and localized corrosion in both brands, while the autoclave caused uniform surface corrosion on the ICE pliers. Autoclave application was the sterilization method that generated less corrosive damage to the orthodontic cutting pliers, when compared to the immersion in 2% peracetic acid.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Dental Press International</pub><pmid>35640079</pmid><doi>10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-1161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-2281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-9118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6329-9439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-6687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5315-663X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2176-9451
ispartof Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2021, Vol.26 (5), p.e2119353-e2119353
issn 2176-9451
2177-6709
2177-6709
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10f6191fe412422fa6496385d9ff6ed7
source PubMed Central (Open Access); SciELO Brazil
subjects Autoclave
Caustics
Corrosion
DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Original
Peracetic Acid
Pilot Projects
Sterilization
Sterilization - methods
title In vitro comparison of peracetic acid and autoclave sterilization in the corrosion of orthodontic pliers: a pilot study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20comparison%20of%20peracetic%20acid%20and%20autoclave%20sterilization%20in%20the%20corrosion%20of%20orthodontic%20pliers:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20press%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Nunes,%20Livia%20Kelly%20Ferraz&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2119353&rft.epage=e2119353&rft.pages=e2119353-e2119353&rft.issn=2176-9451&rft.eissn=2177-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e2119353.oar&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2672325982%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391r-7c3ec962d6e8e05151909598a83b0d8f5a6877f64ca68ccbce9de45810d30efa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672325982&rft_id=info:pmid/35640079&rft_scielo_id=S2176_94512021000500306&rfr_iscdi=true