Learning to Communicate Risk Information in Groups

Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, \& Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability estimates as a function of which mode yields on average the larger group payof...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Judgment and Decision Making 2008-12, Vol.3 (8), p.659-666
Main Authors: Ting, Hsuchi, Wallsten, Thomas S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Communication
Decision making
Design
Estimates
Experiments
group size.
groupsize
probabilities
Probability
probability judgment
risk communication
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, \& Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability estimates as a function of which mode yields on average the larger group payoffs. We extend the result by investigating the effect of group size on the speed with which forecasters converge on the better communication mode. On the basis of social facilitation theory we hypothesized that small groups induce less arousal and anxiety among their members than do large groups when performing new tasks, and therefore that forecasters in small groups will learn the better communication mode more quickly. This result obtained in Experiment 1, which compared groups of size 3 to groups of size 5 or 6. To test whether social loafing rather than social facilitation was mediating the effects, Experiment 2 compared social to personal feedback holding group size constant at 3 members. Learning was faster in the personal feedback condition, suggesting that social facilitation rather than loafing underlay the results.
ISSN:1930-2975
1930-2975
DOI:10.1017/S1930297500001601