Increasing person-centeredness in psychosis inpatient care: staff experiences from the Person-Centered Psychosis Care (PCPC) project

• Published in: BMC health services research 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.596-596, Article 596
• Main Authors: Allerby, K, Goulding, A, Ali, L, Waern, M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Collaboration; Data collection; Decision making; Empowerment; epistemic injustice; everyday life; Female; Focus groups; Health Care Sciences & Services; Health services; health-care; Humans; Inpatient care; Inpatients; Intervention; Interviews; Mental disorders; Nursing; Omvårdnad; Participation; Patient outcomes; Patient-centered care; Patient-Centered Care - methods; people; perceptions; Person-centered care; professionals; Psychiatry; Psychoses; Psychosis; Psychotic Disorders - therapy; Psykiatri; reality; recovery; Researchers; Retrospective Studies; satisfaction; Self Care; shared decision-making; Staff experiences
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08008-z

Interventions to increase person-centeredness in hospital care for persons with psychotic illness are needed. Changing care delivery is however a complex venture, requiring staff to reconsider their mindsets and ways of working. A multidisciplinary educational intervention for hospital staff at four wards was launched to increase person-centeredness in the care of patients with schizophrenia and similar psychoses. This study aims to explore staff experiences of working to increase person-centeredness. A heterogenic sample of staff (n = 23) from all participating wards were recruited for six focus group interviews. Semi-structured questions covered staff perceptions of person-centered care and the process of increasing person-centeredness. Transcribed data was analyzed using thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke. Staff viewed person-centered care as an approach rather than a method. They described central aspects of person-centered care, such as recognizing the patient as a capable person who can participate in her/his care. Statements further showed how these core features were put into practice. Changes related to the intervention were presented in terms of evolving patient and staff roles, improved contact with patients, more flexible care routines, and a more positive ward climate. Neither psychotic symptoms nor involuntary status were considered barriers for person-centered care, but organizational factors beyond staff control seemed to impact on implementation. After implementation, participants displayed good understanding of the core concepts of person-centered care in both thinking and action. They attributed several improvements in the care milieu to an increased level of person-centeredness. Psychotic behavior and involuntary treatment did not present major barriers to person-centered care. Findings suggest person-centered care is feasible in the psychosis inpatient setting and could improve quality of care. The study is part of a larger study evaluating the intervention Person-Centered Psychosis Care (PCPC). It was registered retrospectively at clinicaltrials.gov , identifier NCT03182283 .