The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS

• Published in: Cadernos de saúde pública 2019-01, Vol.35 (7), p.e00000519-e00000519
• Main Authors: Castro, Shamyr, Leite, Camila Ferreira, Coenen, Michaela, Buchalla, Cassia Maria
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Disability Evaluation; Health Status Indicators; Humans; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; Language; Needs Assessment; PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; Research Design - standards; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards; World Health Organization
• ISSN: 0102-311X; 1678-4464; 1678-4464
• DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00000519

Functioning and disability are concepts in increasing use in clinical settings and in public health. From the public health perspective, the use of functioning as a third health indicator could show more than the frequency of a disease and its death rates, offering information on how the population performs its activities and participation. Clinically, the functioning assessment can provide information for patient-centered health care and specific clinical interventions according to their functioning profile. WHODAS 2.0 is a generic tool to assess health and functioning according to the ICF functioning model. It is an alternative to assess functioning in a less time-consuming way, whereas the duration of the application is one of the main ICF critiques. This paper aims to present some of WHODAS 2.0 inconsistencies and weaknesses as well as strategies to cope with them. In this paper, we present some weaknesses related to the WHODAS layout; wording and scoring process. Some suggestions for strategies to correct these weaknesses are presented, as well.