Comparison of serum fractionation methods by data independent label-free proteomics

[Display omitted] •Five prefractionation methods were compared with initial raw serum using data independent label-free analysis.•Not all the commercial prefractionation methods tested show the expected efficiency on serum.•The ProteoPrep® 20 enabled a 49% increase in the number of protein identific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:EuPA open proteomics 2015-12, Vol.9, p.14-22
Main Authors: Baiwir, D., Mazzucchelli, G., Smargiasso, N., Quesada-Calvo, F., De Pauw, E., Malaise, M., Louis, E., Meuwis, M.-A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biochemistry, biophysics & molecular biology
Biochimie, biophysique & biologie moléculaire
Chemistry
Chimie
Data Independent
DEpletion
Equalization
Human health sciences
Label-free Proteomics
Life sciences
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences
Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre
Repeatability
Sciences de la santé humaine
Sciences du vivant
Serum prefractionation
Serum prefractionnation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Five prefractionation methods were compared with initial raw serum using data independent label-free analysis.•Not all the commercial prefractionation methods tested show the expected efficiency on serum.•The ProteoPrep® 20 enabled a 49% increase in the number of protein identifications.•The ProteoPrep® 20 reached proteins at initial raw serum concentration 61 times lower than what was obtained for the raw serum.•Qualitative and quantitative data (including repeatability and recovery) are discussed for clinical proteomics application. Off-line sample prefractionations applied prior to biomarker discovery proteomics are options to enable more protein identifications and detect low-abundance proteins. This work compared five commercial methods efficiency to raw serum analysis using label-free proteomics. The variability of the protein quantities determined for each process was similar to the unprefractionated serum. A 49% increase in protein identifications and 12.2% of reliable quantification were obtained. A 61 times lower limit of protein quantitation was reached compared to protein concentrations observed in raw serum. The concentrations of detected proteins were confronted to estimated reference values.
ISSN:2212-9685
2212-9685
DOI:10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009