Loading…

Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care

Objectives: Telemedicine has been rapidly implemented in orthopedics during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to quantify opportunity costs for patients attending typical in-person appointments and understand their perceptions of telemedicine for follow-up care. Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:SAGE open medicine 2021, Vol.9, p.20503121211045247-20503121211045247
Main Authors: Thatcher, Mitchell D, Thatcher, Michael W, Smith, Mckinley C, McCarron, Michelle, Reed, Jeremy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3
container_end_page 20503121211045247
container_issue
container_start_page 20503121211045247
container_title SAGE open medicine
container_volume 9
creator Thatcher, Mitchell D
Thatcher, Michael W
Smith, Mckinley C
McCarron, Michelle
Reed, Jeremy
description Objectives: Telemedicine has been rapidly implemented in orthopedics during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to quantify opportunity costs for patients attending typical in-person appointments and understand their perceptions of telemedicine for follow-up care. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by surveying patients who had elective orthopedic surgery and attended at least one in-person and one phone call appointment. The survey assessed opportunity costs associated with in-person appointments, experience with telemedicine, and preferred type of future appointment. Results: Of the 49 eligible patients, 41 (83.7%) completed the survey. The median travel distance to the clinic was 108 km, and the time spent in the clinic was 60 min. Participants responded “yes” to various forms of opportunity costs associated with attending in-person appointments, including missed work (46.3%), lost income (34.1%), recreational activities (26.8%), home or yard care (14.6%), socializing with friends or family (12.2%), school (2.4%), and childcare (2.4%). In addition, elements of the telemedicine appointment were rated from 1 (least favorable) to 10 (most favorable), and averages were calculated for ease of use (9.2), convenience (8.4), confidence in the doctor’s diagnostic ability (8.2), likelihood of using the service again (6.4), and overall satisfaction (8.2). Preferred future appointment types included having the first visit in-person and subsequent visits via telephone (61.0%), in-person only (36.6%), and unsure (2.4%). Conclusion: This study identifies various opportunity costs associated with in-person orthopedic appointments and a favorable view toward telemedicine for follow-up care.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/20503121211045247
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_125f74130c184f3d92ad05d93bc7b40c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20503121211045247</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_125f74130c184f3d92ad05d93bc7b40c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2573435264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kltrFTEQxxdRbKn9AL5IwBdfTs1tN2dfBCleCoW-6HOYncye5rAnWZOstd_eHE-trSIhZJj85j8XpmleCn4mhDFvJW-5ErIewXUrtXnSHO99q73z6QP7qDnNecs5F7xfd1w-b45UDTBSd8fNfDXPMZUl-HLLMOaSWRwZlELB-bBheUkbjzAxnHzwyKDiPpQdhUpCcIx-zJQ8BaTMbny5ZoUm2pHz6AOxMaZ6pynerJaZISR60TwbYcp0eveeNF8_fvhy_nl1efXp4vz95QpbJcuKJDrZic6NIEFU26yxc4MAM8hRoxk0AJIE41Aj9CgNSS5G0yMNNGqnTpqLg66LsLVz8jtItzaCt78cMW0spOJxIitkOxotFEex1qNyvQTHW9erYZ-HY9V6d9Cal6G2hrX5BNMj0cc_wV_bTfxu11p1SvAq8OZOIMVvC-Vidz4jTRMEiku2sjVKq1Z2uqKv_0K3cUmhjsrWeSjZ9a1cV0ocKEwx50TjfTGC2_162H_Wo8a8etjFfcTvZajA2QHIsKE_af-v-BNsO8VX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613269528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Thatcher, Mitchell D ; Thatcher, Michael W ; Smith, Mckinley C ; McCarron, Michelle ; Reed, Jeremy</creator><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Mitchell D ; Thatcher, Michael W ; Smith, Mckinley C ; McCarron, Michelle ; Reed, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Telemedicine has been rapidly implemented in orthopedics during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to quantify opportunity costs for patients attending typical in-person appointments and understand their perceptions of telemedicine for follow-up care. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by surveying patients who had elective orthopedic surgery and attended at least one in-person and one phone call appointment. The survey assessed opportunity costs associated with in-person appointments, experience with telemedicine, and preferred type of future appointment. Results: Of the 49 eligible patients, 41 (83.7%) completed the survey. The median travel distance to the clinic was 108 km, and the time spent in the clinic was 60 min. Participants responded “yes” to various forms of opportunity costs associated with attending in-person appointments, including missed work (46.3%), lost income (34.1%), recreational activities (26.8%), home or yard care (14.6%), socializing with friends or family (12.2%), school (2.4%), and childcare (2.4%). In addition, elements of the telemedicine appointment were rated from 1 (least favorable) to 10 (most favorable), and averages were calculated for ease of use (9.2), convenience (8.4), confidence in the doctor’s diagnostic ability (8.2), likelihood of using the service again (6.4), and overall satisfaction (8.2). Preferred future appointment types included having the first visit in-person and subsequent visits via telephone (61.0%), in-person only (36.6%), and unsure (2.4%). Conclusion: This study identifies various opportunity costs associated with in-person orthopedic appointments and a favorable view toward telemedicine for follow-up care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-3121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-3121</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20503121211045247</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34527246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bone surgery ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Opportunity costs ; Original ; Orthopedics ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>SAGE open medicine, 2021, Vol.9, p.20503121211045247-20503121211045247</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2587-265X ; 0000-0002-8725-6337 ; 0000-0002-2725-281X ; 0000-0002-2321-3960</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436310/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2613269528?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,4010,21947,25734,27834,27904,27905,27906,36993,36994,38497,43876,44571,44926,45314,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mckinley C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><title>Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care</title><title>SAGE open medicine</title><addtitle>SAGE Open Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: Telemedicine has been rapidly implemented in orthopedics during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to quantify opportunity costs for patients attending typical in-person appointments and understand their perceptions of telemedicine for follow-up care. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by surveying patients who had elective orthopedic surgery and attended at least one in-person and one phone call appointment. The survey assessed opportunity costs associated with in-person appointments, experience with telemedicine, and preferred type of future appointment. Results: Of the 49 eligible patients, 41 (83.7%) completed the survey. The median travel distance to the clinic was 108 km, and the time spent in the clinic was 60 min. Participants responded “yes” to various forms of opportunity costs associated with attending in-person appointments, including missed work (46.3%), lost income (34.1%), recreational activities (26.8%), home or yard care (14.6%), socializing with friends or family (12.2%), school (2.4%), and childcare (2.4%). In addition, elements of the telemedicine appointment were rated from 1 (least favorable) to 10 (most favorable), and averages were calculated for ease of use (9.2), convenience (8.4), confidence in the doctor’s diagnostic ability (8.2), likelihood of using the service again (6.4), and overall satisfaction (8.2). Preferred future appointment types included having the first visit in-person and subsequent visits via telephone (61.0%), in-person only (36.6%), and unsure (2.4%). Conclusion: This study identifies various opportunity costs associated with in-person orthopedic appointments and a favorable view toward telemedicine for follow-up care.</description><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2050-3121</issn><issn>2050-3121</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kltrFTEQxxdRbKn9AL5IwBdfTs1tN2dfBCleCoW-6HOYncye5rAnWZOstd_eHE-trSIhZJj85j8XpmleCn4mhDFvJW-5ErIewXUrtXnSHO99q73z6QP7qDnNecs5F7xfd1w-b45UDTBSd8fNfDXPMZUl-HLLMOaSWRwZlELB-bBheUkbjzAxnHzwyKDiPpQdhUpCcIx-zJQ8BaTMbny5ZoUm2pHz6AOxMaZ6pynerJaZISR60TwbYcp0eveeNF8_fvhy_nl1efXp4vz95QpbJcuKJDrZic6NIEFU26yxc4MAM8hRoxk0AJIE41Aj9CgNSS5G0yMNNGqnTpqLg66LsLVz8jtItzaCt78cMW0spOJxIitkOxotFEex1qNyvQTHW9erYZ-HY9V6d9Cal6G2hrX5BNMj0cc_wV_bTfxu11p1SvAq8OZOIMVvC-Vidz4jTRMEiku2sjVKq1Z2uqKv_0K3cUmhjsrWeSjZ9a1cV0ocKEwx50TjfTGC2_162H_Wo8a8etjFfcTvZajA2QHIsKE_af-v-BNsO8VX</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Thatcher, Mitchell D</creator><creator>Thatcher, Michael W</creator><creator>Smith, Mckinley C</creator><creator>McCarron, Michelle</creator><creator>Reed, Jeremy</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2587-265X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8725-6337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-281X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2321-3960</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care</title><author>Thatcher, Mitchell D ; Thatcher, Michael W ; Smith, Mckinley C ; McCarron, Michelle ; Reed, Jeremy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mckinley C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>SAGE open medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thatcher, Mitchell D</au><au>Thatcher, Michael W</au><au>Smith, Mckinley C</au><au>McCarron, Michelle</au><au>Reed, Jeremy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care</atitle><jtitle>SAGE open medicine</jtitle><addtitle>SAGE Open Med</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>20503121211045247</spage><epage>20503121211045247</epage><pages>20503121211045247-20503121211045247</pages><issn>2050-3121</issn><eissn>2050-3121</eissn><abstract>Objectives: Telemedicine has been rapidly implemented in orthopedics during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to quantify opportunity costs for patients attending typical in-person appointments and understand their perceptions of telemedicine for follow-up care. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by surveying patients who had elective orthopedic surgery and attended at least one in-person and one phone call appointment. The survey assessed opportunity costs associated with in-person appointments, experience with telemedicine, and preferred type of future appointment. Results: Of the 49 eligible patients, 41 (83.7%) completed the survey. The median travel distance to the clinic was 108 km, and the time spent in the clinic was 60 min. Participants responded “yes” to various forms of opportunity costs associated with attending in-person appointments, including missed work (46.3%), lost income (34.1%), recreational activities (26.8%), home or yard care (14.6%), socializing with friends or family (12.2%), school (2.4%), and childcare (2.4%). In addition, elements of the telemedicine appointment were rated from 1 (least favorable) to 10 (most favorable), and averages were calculated for ease of use (9.2), convenience (8.4), confidence in the doctor’s diagnostic ability (8.2), likelihood of using the service again (6.4), and overall satisfaction (8.2). Preferred future appointment types included having the first visit in-person and subsequent visits via telephone (61.0%), in-person only (36.6%), and unsure (2.4%). Conclusion: This study identifies various opportunity costs associated with in-person orthopedic appointments and a favorable view toward telemedicine for follow-up care.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34527246</pmid><doi>10.1177/20503121211045247</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2587-265X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8725-6337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-281X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2321-3960</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-3121
ispartof SAGE open medicine, 2021, Vol.9, p.20503121211045247-20503121211045247
issn 2050-3121
2050-3121
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_125f74130c184f3d92ad05d93bc7b40c
source PubMed (Medline); Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Bone surgery
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Opportunity costs
Original
Orthopedics
Telemedicine
title Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opportunity%20costs%20of%20attending%20surgical%20clinic%20appointments%20and%20experiences%20with%20telemedicine%20for%20follow-up%20care&rft.jtitle=SAGE%20open%20medicine&rft.au=Thatcher,%20Mitchell%20D&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=20503121211045247&rft.epage=20503121211045247&rft.pages=20503121211045247-20503121211045247&rft.issn=2050-3121&rft.eissn=2050-3121&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20503121211045247&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2573435264%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-e2cd2616dfa2a1cd278c6db1a7b2f4c7b4aace2a7dc4ca9c27e201f79cebef4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613269528&rft_id=info:pmid/34527246&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20503121211045247&rfr_iscdi=true