Formative evaluation prior to implementation of a brief treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care

• Published in: Implementation science communications 2023-05, Vol.4 (1), p.48-48, Article 48
• Main Authors: Valentine, Sarah E, Fuchs, Cara, Olesinski, Elyse A, Sarkisova, Natalya, Godfrey, Laura B, Elwy, A Rani
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavior modification; Collaboration; Formative evaluation; Health care access; Health services; Implementation; Interdisciplinary aspects; Intervention; Medicaid; Medical referrals; Mental health; Patients; Physicians; Post traumatic stress disorder; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Primary care; Skill development; Stakeholders; Stigma; Success; Therapists
• ISSN: 2662-2211; 2662-2211
• DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00426-2

Successful implementation of evidence-based treatments (EBT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in primary care may address treatment access and quality gaps by providing care in novel and less stigmatized settings. Yet, PTSD treatments are largely unavailable in safety net primary care. We aimed to collect clinician stakeholder data on organizational, attitudinal, and contextual factors relevant to EBT implementation. Our developmental formative evaluation was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), including (a) surveys assessing implementation climate and attitudes towards EBTs and behavioral health integration and (b) semi-structured interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and need for augmentation. Participants were hospital employees (N = 22), including primary care physicians (n = 6), integrated behavioral health clinicians (n = 8), community wellness advocates (n = 3), and clinic leadership (n = 5). We report frequency and descriptives of survey data and findings from directed content analysis of interviews. We used a concurrent mixed-methods approach, integrating survey and interview data collected simultaneously using a joint display approach. A primary care community advisory board (CAB) helped to refine interview guides and interpret findings. Stakeholders described implementation determinants of the EBT related to the CFIR domains of intervention characteristics (relative advantage, adaptability), outer setting (patient needs and resources), inner setting (networks and communication, relative priority, leadership engagement, available resources), and individuals involved (knowledge and beliefs, cultural considerations). Stakeholders described strong attitudinal support (relative advantage), yet therapist time and capacity restraints are major PTSD treatment implementation barriers (available resources). Changes in hospital management were perceived as potentially allowing for greater access to behavioral health services, including EBTs. Patient engagement barriers such as stigma, mistrust, and care preferences were also noted (patient needs and resources). Recommendations included tailoring the intervention to meet existing workflows (adaptability), system alignment efforts focused on improving detection, referral, and care coordination processes (networks and communication), protecting clinician time for training and consultation (leadership engagement), and embedding a researc