Validation of smoking cessation self-reported by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The present study reports on the biochemical validation of the self-reported smoking status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective is to establish the proportion of overestimation of self-reported success rates. A cross-sectional smoking-status validation study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of general medicine 2011-01, Vol.4 (default), p.85-90
Main Authors: Hilberink, Sander R, Jacobs, Johanna E, van Opstal, Sanne, van der Weijden, Trudy, Keegstra, Janine, Kempers, Pascal Lj, Muris, Jean Wm, Grol, Richard Ptm, de Vries, Hein
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
biochemical validation
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
general practice
Health risk assessment
Original Research
outcome measurement
smoking cessation
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study reports on the biochemical validation of the self-reported smoking status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective is to establish the proportion of overestimation of self-reported success rates. A cross-sectional smoking-status validation study including 60 patients with COPD who reported that they had stopped smoking. In the analysis of urine samples, a cut-off point of 50 ng/mL of cotinine was used. At the time of biochemical validation, 55 patients reported that they had quit smoking while five patients resumed smoking. Smoking status was biochemically confirmed for 43 patients (78%) and 12 patients (22%) were classified as smokers. The sensitivity of the self- report of smoking was 29% and the specificity was 100%. Many primary care patients with COPD do not provide valid information on their smoking status, which hamper adequate therapeutic interventions. Integration of biochemical validation in daily care could overcome this problem, but may harm the doctor-patient relationship.
ISSN:1178-7074
1178-7074
DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S15231