Loading…

Eggs of little bitterns show high variation and their size increases with latitude

Egg size is an important determinant of offspring weight and survival. However, despite extensive research on factors affecting egg dimensions, causes of egg variation are not fully understood. Between 2000 and 2016 we studied a population of little bitterns in western Poland, and examined a total o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European zoological journal 2021-01, Vol.88 (1), p.891-899
Main Authors: Stępniewski, J., Halupka, L., Czyż, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Egg size is an important determinant of offspring weight and survival. However, despite extensive research on factors affecting egg dimensions, causes of egg variation are not fully understood. Between 2000 and 2016 we studied a population of little bitterns in western Poland, and examined a total of 529 eggs from 88 clutches. Furthermore, we conducted an extensive literature search for data on clutch and egg size from other populations of the species to test hypotheses explaining the relationships between these variables and latitude. Little bitterns in western Poland laid big eggs but also produced large clutches compared to most other studied populations of the species. The ratio of largest to smallest egg calculated for egg volume was 1.75 for all studied eggs, and up to 1.35 within clutches, suggesting a huge variation between and within clutches in the studied population. Egg dimensions were highly intercorrelated, but egg size was not related to clutch size in the study population. The comparison of data from different populations of the species revealed that egg volume increased significantly with latitude and was positively correlated with clutch size. These results support the embryonic temperature hypothesis and clutch cooling rates hypothesis, but contradict the optimal egg dimensions hypothesis.
ISSN:2475-0263
2475-0263
DOI:10.1080/24750263.2021.1953159