Accuracy of two prognostic indexes to predict mortality in older adults with advanced dementia

• Published in: Dementia & neuropsychologia 2022-01, Vol.16 (1), p.52-60
• Main Authors: Lopes, Beatriz Noele Azevedo, Garcez, Flavia Barreto, Suemoto, Claudia Kimie, Morillo, Lilian Schafirovits
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; CLINICAL NEUROLOGY; Dementia; GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY; HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES; MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL; Mortality; NURSING; Original; Prognosis; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOLOGY; Survival Analysis
• ISSN: 1980-5764; 1980-5764
• DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2021-0028

Dementia is a cause of disability among older adults. Accessing advanced dementia prognosis is a challenge. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Charlson and Carey indexes in predicting 3-year survival of older adults with advanced dementia. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 238 patients aged ≥60 years with advanced dementia from an outpatient clinic and classified as stage ≥6A by using the Functional Assessment Staging scale. We excluded patients with missing data. We reviewed the semi-structured interview (clinical, sociodemographic, and functional data) from the baseline visit. This information was used to calculate 3-year mortality risks according to the Charlson and Carey indexes. We used Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the associations of all-cause mortality with both indexes, adjusted for sociodemographic variables. We used Harrell’s C measure to determine the discrimination. We calculated the absolute differences between observed and predicted 3-year mortality risks for each index for calibration. Results: In 238 patients, the average age was 80.5±7.8 years, with 36% being men. The median follow-up time was 1.8 years (0.05–3.0). The 3-year all-cause mortality rate was 50% (119 deaths). The Carey index was associated with mortality, with one point increase related to a 15% increase in the mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]=1.15, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.06–1.25, p=0.001), even after adjustment. Accuracy for the Charlson index and Carey index was 0.55 (95%CI 0.49–0.60) and 0.60 (95%CI 0.52–0.62), respectively, with no difference between them (p=0.44). Conclusions: Both indexes had poor discrimination and calibration performances in predicting 3-year mortality in patients with advanced dementia. RESUMO. Demência é uma causa de incapacidade e dependência em idosos. A avaliação prognóstica na fase avançada é desafiadora. Objetivo: Avaliar a acurácia dos índices de Charlson e Carey na predição de mortalidade em até três anos de idosos com demência avançada. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectiva que incluiu 238 pacientes acompanhados em ambulatório especializado em um país de renda média, com idade ≥60 anos e demência avançada classificada como estágio ≥6A pela escala Functional Assessment Staging (FAST). Foram excluídos pacientes com dados incompletos para análise. Realizou-se revisão da primeira consulta, que consiste em entrevista com dados clínicos, sociodemográficos e funcionai