Loading…

Cyclic Responses of Two-Side-Connected Precast-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels with Different Slit Types

This study aimed to study the cyclic behavior of two-side-connected precast-reinforced concrete infill panel (RCIP). A total of four RCIP specimens with different slit types and height-to-span ratios modeled at a one-third scale were tested subjected to cyclic lateral loads. The failure mode, hyster...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Buildings (Basel) 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.16
Main Authors: Sun, Guohua, Li, Fei, Zhou, Qiyou
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Buildings (Basel)
container_volume 12
creator Sun, Guohua
Li, Fei
Zhou, Qiyou
description This study aimed to study the cyclic behavior of two-side-connected precast-reinforced concrete infill panel (RCIP). A total of four RCIP specimens with different slit types and height-to-span ratios modeled at a one-third scale were tested subjected to cyclic lateral loads. The failure mode, hysteretic behavior, lateral strength, stiffness degradation, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of each RCIP specimen were determined and analyzed. The specimens experienced a similar damage process, which involved concrete cracking, steel rebar yielding, concrete crushing, and plastic hinge formation. All the specimens showed pinched hysteretic curves, resulting in a small energy dissipation capacity and a maximum equivalent viscous damping ratio lower than 0.2. The specimens with penetrated slits experienced ductile failure, in which flexural hinges developed at both slit wall ends. The application of penetrated slits decreased the initial stiffness and lateral load-bearing capacity of the RC panel but increased the deformation capacity, the average ultimate drift ratios ranged from 1.41% to 1.99%, and the lowest average ductility ratio reached 2.48. The specimens with high-strength concrete resulted in a small slip no more than 1 mm between the RC panel and steel beam, and the channel shear connectors ensured that the RC infill panel developed a reliable assembly with the surrounding steel components. However, specimens with concealed vertical slits (CVSs) and concealed hollow slits (CHSs) achieved significantly higher lateral stiffness and lateral strength values. Generally, the specimens exhibited two-stage mechanical features. The concrete in the CVSs and CHSs was crushed, and flexural plastic hinges developed at both ends of the slit walls during the second stage. With increasing concrete strength, the initial lateral stiffness and lateral strength values of the RCIP specimens increased. With an increasing height-to-span ratio, the lateral stiffness and strength of the RC panels with slits decreased, but the failure mode remained unchanged.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/buildings12010016
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_12f6a309327149c591e28a172b0be85f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_12f6a309327149c591e28a172b0be85f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2621272203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUU1LAzEQXUTBUv0B3gKeV5PJfh6lfhUKFq3nkGQnmrIma5JS-u_dWhHBOcwMb4b3hnlZdsHoFectvVYb23fWvUUGlFHKqqNsArQu85LT9vhPf5qdx7imYzQlQFlMsvVsp3uryTPGwbuIkXhDVlufv9gO85l3DnXCjiwDahlT_ozWGR_0CI1DHTAhmTtj-54spcM-kq1N7-TWGoMBXSIvvU1ktRswnmUnRvYRz3_qNHu9v1vNHvPF08N8drPINW8g5ZViXQG6qSiUoLhEWpjOqEJj0TCmKjSt1KxQUnHoEArejrlGqaSsuKw5n2bzA2_n5VoMwX7IsBNeWvEN-PAmZEhW9ygYmEqOf-FQs6LVZcsQGslqUFRhU5qR6_LANQT_ucGYxNpvghvPF1ABgxqA7hXZYUsHH2NA86vKqNg7JP45xL8AG3eGSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621272203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclic Responses of Two-Side-Connected Precast-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels with Different Slit Types</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Sun, Guohua ; Li, Fei ; Zhou, Qiyou</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guohua ; Li, Fei ; Zhou, Qiyou</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to study the cyclic behavior of two-side-connected precast-reinforced concrete infill panel (RCIP). A total of four RCIP specimens with different slit types and height-to-span ratios modeled at a one-third scale were tested subjected to cyclic lateral loads. The failure mode, hysteretic behavior, lateral strength, stiffness degradation, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of each RCIP specimen were determined and analyzed. The specimens experienced a similar damage process, which involved concrete cracking, steel rebar yielding, concrete crushing, and plastic hinge formation. All the specimens showed pinched hysteretic curves, resulting in a small energy dissipation capacity and a maximum equivalent viscous damping ratio lower than 0.2. The specimens with penetrated slits experienced ductile failure, in which flexural hinges developed at both slit wall ends. The application of penetrated slits decreased the initial stiffness and lateral load-bearing capacity of the RC panel but increased the deformation capacity, the average ultimate drift ratios ranged from 1.41% to 1.99%, and the lowest average ductility ratio reached 2.48. The specimens with high-strength concrete resulted in a small slip no more than 1 mm between the RC panel and steel beam, and the channel shear connectors ensured that the RC infill panel developed a reliable assembly with the surrounding steel components. However, specimens with concealed vertical slits (CVSs) and concealed hollow slits (CHSs) achieved significantly higher lateral stiffness and lateral strength values. Generally, the specimens exhibited two-stage mechanical features. The concrete in the CVSs and CHSs was crushed, and flexural plastic hinges developed at both ends of the slit walls during the second stage. With increasing concrete strength, the initial lateral stiffness and lateral strength values of the RCIP specimens increased. With an increasing height-to-span ratio, the lateral stiffness and strength of the RC panels with slits decreased, but the failure mode remained unchanged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-5309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-5309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/buildings12010016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bearing capacity ; concealed hollow slit ; concealed vertical slit ; Concrete ; Concrete properties ; Connectors ; Cracking (fracturing) ; cyclic load ; Cyclic loads ; Damping capacity ; Damping ratio ; Deformation ; Ductility ; Earthquakes ; Energy dissipation ; Failure modes ; High strength concretes ; Hysteresis ; hysteretic behavior ; Lateral loads ; Load bearing elements ; Panels ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; Precast concrete ; RC infill panel ; Redevelopment ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Slits ; Steel ; Steel beams ; Stiffness ; vertical slit ; Viscous damping ; Yield stress</subject><ispartof>Buildings (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.16</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621272203/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621272203?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Qiyou</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclic Responses of Two-Side-Connected Precast-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels with Different Slit Types</title><title>Buildings (Basel)</title><description>This study aimed to study the cyclic behavior of two-side-connected precast-reinforced concrete infill panel (RCIP). A total of four RCIP specimens with different slit types and height-to-span ratios modeled at a one-third scale were tested subjected to cyclic lateral loads. The failure mode, hysteretic behavior, lateral strength, stiffness degradation, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of each RCIP specimen were determined and analyzed. The specimens experienced a similar damage process, which involved concrete cracking, steel rebar yielding, concrete crushing, and plastic hinge formation. All the specimens showed pinched hysteretic curves, resulting in a small energy dissipation capacity and a maximum equivalent viscous damping ratio lower than 0.2. The specimens with penetrated slits experienced ductile failure, in which flexural hinges developed at both slit wall ends. The application of penetrated slits decreased the initial stiffness and lateral load-bearing capacity of the RC panel but increased the deformation capacity, the average ultimate drift ratios ranged from 1.41% to 1.99%, and the lowest average ductility ratio reached 2.48. The specimens with high-strength concrete resulted in a small slip no more than 1 mm between the RC panel and steel beam, and the channel shear connectors ensured that the RC infill panel developed a reliable assembly with the surrounding steel components. However, specimens with concealed vertical slits (CVSs) and concealed hollow slits (CHSs) achieved significantly higher lateral stiffness and lateral strength values. Generally, the specimens exhibited two-stage mechanical features. The concrete in the CVSs and CHSs was crushed, and flexural plastic hinges developed at both ends of the slit walls during the second stage. With increasing concrete strength, the initial lateral stiffness and lateral strength values of the RCIP specimens increased. With an increasing height-to-span ratio, the lateral stiffness and strength of the RC panels with slits decreased, but the failure mode remained unchanged.</description><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>concealed hollow slit</subject><subject>concealed vertical slit</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete properties</subject><subject>Connectors</subject><subject>Cracking (fracturing)</subject><subject>cyclic load</subject><subject>Cyclic loads</subject><subject>Damping capacity</subject><subject>Damping ratio</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>High strength concretes</subject><subject>Hysteresis</subject><subject>hysteretic behavior</subject><subject>Lateral loads</subject><subject>Load bearing elements</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Precast concrete</subject><subject>RC infill panel</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Slits</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel beams</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>vertical slit</subject><subject>Viscous damping</subject><subject>Yield stress</subject><issn>2075-5309</issn><issn>2075-5309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplUU1LAzEQXUTBUv0B3gKeV5PJfh6lfhUKFq3nkGQnmrIma5JS-u_dWhHBOcwMb4b3hnlZdsHoFectvVYb23fWvUUGlFHKqqNsArQu85LT9vhPf5qdx7imYzQlQFlMsvVsp3uryTPGwbuIkXhDVlufv9gO85l3DnXCjiwDahlT_ozWGR_0CI1DHTAhmTtj-54spcM-kq1N7-TWGoMBXSIvvU1ktRswnmUnRvYRz3_qNHu9v1vNHvPF08N8drPINW8g5ZViXQG6qSiUoLhEWpjOqEJj0TCmKjSt1KxQUnHoEArejrlGqaSsuKw5n2bzA2_n5VoMwX7IsBNeWvEN-PAmZEhW9ygYmEqOf-FQs6LVZcsQGslqUFRhU5qR6_LANQT_ucGYxNpvghvPF1ABgxqA7hXZYUsHH2NA86vKqNg7JP45xL8AG3eGSw</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Sun, Guohua</creator><creator>Li, Fei</creator><creator>Zhou, Qiyou</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Cyclic Responses of Two-Side-Connected Precast-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels with Different Slit Types</title><author>Sun, Guohua ; Li, Fei ; Zhou, Qiyou</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>concealed hollow slit</topic><topic>concealed vertical slit</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete properties</topic><topic>Connectors</topic><topic>Cracking (fracturing)</topic><topic>cyclic load</topic><topic>Cyclic loads</topic><topic>Damping capacity</topic><topic>Damping ratio</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>High strength concretes</topic><topic>Hysteresis</topic><topic>hysteretic behavior</topic><topic>Lateral loads</topic><topic>Load bearing elements</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Precast concrete</topic><topic>RC infill panel</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Slits</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel beams</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>vertical slit</topic><topic>Viscous damping</topic><topic>Yield stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Qiyou</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Buildings (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Guohua</au><au>Li, Fei</au><au>Zhou, Qiyou</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclic Responses of Two-Side-Connected Precast-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels with Different Slit Types</atitle><jtitle>Buildings (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><pages>16-</pages><issn>2075-5309</issn><eissn>2075-5309</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to study the cyclic behavior of two-side-connected precast-reinforced concrete infill panel (RCIP). A total of four RCIP specimens with different slit types and height-to-span ratios modeled at a one-third scale were tested subjected to cyclic lateral loads. The failure mode, hysteretic behavior, lateral strength, stiffness degradation, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of each RCIP specimen were determined and analyzed. The specimens experienced a similar damage process, which involved concrete cracking, steel rebar yielding, concrete crushing, and plastic hinge formation. All the specimens showed pinched hysteretic curves, resulting in a small energy dissipation capacity and a maximum equivalent viscous damping ratio lower than 0.2. The specimens with penetrated slits experienced ductile failure, in which flexural hinges developed at both slit wall ends. The application of penetrated slits decreased the initial stiffness and lateral load-bearing capacity of the RC panel but increased the deformation capacity, the average ultimate drift ratios ranged from 1.41% to 1.99%, and the lowest average ductility ratio reached 2.48. The specimens with high-strength concrete resulted in a small slip no more than 1 mm between the RC panel and steel beam, and the channel shear connectors ensured that the RC infill panel developed a reliable assembly with the surrounding steel components. However, specimens with concealed vertical slits (CVSs) and concealed hollow slits (CHSs) achieved significantly higher lateral stiffness and lateral strength values. Generally, the specimens exhibited two-stage mechanical features. The concrete in the CVSs and CHSs was crushed, and flexural plastic hinges developed at both ends of the slit walls during the second stage. With increasing concrete strength, the initial lateral stiffness and lateral strength values of the RCIP specimens increased. With an increasing height-to-span ratio, the lateral stiffness and strength of the RC panels with slits decreased, but the failure mode remained unchanged.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/buildings12010016</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-5309
ispartof Buildings (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.16
issn 2075-5309
2075-5309
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_12f6a309327149c591e28a172b0be85f
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Bearing capacity
concealed hollow slit
concealed vertical slit
Concrete
Concrete properties
Connectors
Cracking (fracturing)
cyclic load
Cyclic loads
Damping capacity
Damping ratio
Deformation
Ductility
Earthquakes
Energy dissipation
Failure modes
High strength concretes
Hysteresis
hysteretic behavior
Lateral loads
Load bearing elements
Panels
Plastic properties
Plasticity
Precast concrete
RC infill panel
Redevelopment
Reinforced concrete
Reinforcing steels
Slits
Steel
Steel beams
Stiffness
vertical slit
Viscous damping
Yield stress
title Cyclic Responses of Two-Side-Connected Precast-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels with Different Slit Types
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclic%20Responses%20of%20Two-Side-Connected%20Precast-Reinforced%20Concrete%20Infill%20Panels%20with%20Different%20Slit%20Types&rft.jtitle=Buildings%20(Basel)&rft.au=Sun,%20Guohua&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.pages=16-&rft.issn=2075-5309&rft.eissn=2075-5309&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/buildings12010016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2621272203%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6b1d42c860252b3ae04fdfb4ce4811b6ef9ac14bab32de2439de27eabaa63a733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621272203&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true