Loading…

High ctDNA molecule numbers relate with poor outcome in advanced ER+, HER2− postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with everolimus and exemestane

We determined whether progression‐free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving everolimus plus exemestane (EVE/EXE) varies depending on circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) characteristics. Baseline plasma cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) from 164 postmenopausal women with ER‐positive, HE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular oncology 2020-03, Vol.14 (3), p.490-503
Main Authors: Kruger, Dinja T., Jansen, Maurice P.H.M., Konings, Inge R.H.M., Dercksen, Wouter M., Jager, Agnes, Oulad Hadj, Jamal, Sleijfer, Stefan, Martens, John W.M., Boven, Epie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We determined whether progression‐free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving everolimus plus exemestane (EVE/EXE) varies depending on circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) characteristics. Baseline plasma cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) from 164 postmenopausal women with ER‐positive, HER2‐negative MBC refractory to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor and treated with standard EVE/EXE (Everolimus Biomarker Study, Eudract 2013‐004120‐11) was characterised for 10 relevant breast cancer genes by next‐generation sequencing with molecular barcoding. ctDNA molecule numbers, number of mutations and specific variants were related with PFS and overall survival (OS). Missense hotspot mutations in cfDNA were detected in 125 patients. The median of 54 ctDNA molecules per mL plasma distinguished patients with high and low/no ctDNA load. Patients with low/no ctDNA load (N = 102) showed longer median PFS of 5.7 months (P = 0.006) and OS of 124.8 months (P = 0.008) than patients with high ctDNA load (N = 62; 4.4 months and 107.7 months, respectively) in multivariate analyses. Patients with
ISSN:1574-7891
1878-0261
DOI:10.1002/1878-0261.12617