Loading…

Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes

Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities assoc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2018-08, Vol.6, p.e5508-e5508, Article e5508
Main Authors: Li, Yan, Kong, Yan, Teng, Dexiong, Zhang, Xueni, He, Xuemin, Zhang, Yang, Lv, Guanghui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813
container_end_page e5508
container_issue
container_start_page e5508
container_title PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
container_volume 6
creator Li, Yan
Kong, Yan
Teng, Dexiong
Zhang, Xueni
He, Xuemin
Zhang, Yang
Lv, Guanghui
description Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas. Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed. Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of , and associated bacterial communities was lower than that of and communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of and was very different from those of and . The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients. Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj.5508
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1328e220bae94e8c8e946bdb6707af85</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1328e220bae94e8c8e946bdb6707af85</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2100327957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoMottTe-ANkwBsRpuZjJx83QilaCwVB9DqcZE52s8xM1mSm0P56s922tObmhJOHh5e8hLxn9Ewppr7sEPP2rOuofkWOOZOq1aIzr5_dj8hpKVtaj-aSavGWHAnKtJRaH5PzX5t4lxz4GXOEofFpHJcpzhFLk0IT4g3WXZu8X3KO07rpsWCemw0Mabe5nbG8I28CDAVPH-YJ-fP92--LH-31z8uri_Pr1q8Un1vGOPa4AuadXjEW0PU9dQE4V9JooYMwYDy6YExNw5X2GrzkAKKjFWDihFwdvH2Crd3lOEK-tQmivV-kvLaQ5-gHtExwjZxTB2hWWE11SNc7qaiCoLvq-npw7RY3Yu9xmjMML6QvX6a4set0YyVjRtJ9mE8Pgpz-LlhmO8bicRhgwrQUyxmlgivTqYp-_A_dpiVP9assp0YJpaTklfp8oHxOpWQMT2EYtfui7X3Rdl90hT88j_-EPtYq_gFLO6VC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097377662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Yan ; Kong, Yan ; Teng, Dexiong ; Zhang, Xueni ; He, Xuemin ; Zhang, Yang ; Lv, Guanghui</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan ; Kong, Yan ; Teng, Dexiong ; Zhang, Xueni ; He, Xuemin ; Zhang, Yang ; Lv, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas. Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed. Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of , and associated bacterial communities was lower than that of and communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of and was very different from those of and . The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients. Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies involving more halophyte species, and individuals per species, are necessary to elucidate plant species identity effects on the rhizosphere for co-occurring halophytes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30186688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacterial community ; Biology ; Community composition ; Community structure ; Diversity ; Ecology ; Firmicutes ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Halocnemum strobilaceum ; Halophyte ; Halophytes ; Limonium ; Lycium ; Microbiology ; Microorganisms ; Nutrient content ; Plant growth ; Precipitation ; Proteobacteria ; Rhizosphere ; rRNA 16S ; Salinity ; Salt ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil nutrients ; Soil properties ; Species ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2018-08, Vol.6, p.e5508-e5508, Article e5508</ispartof><rights>2018 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Li et al. 2018 Li et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2097377662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2097377662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Dexiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xueni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xuemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><title>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas. Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed. Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of , and associated bacterial communities was lower than that of and communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of and was very different from those of and . The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients. Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies involving more halophyte species, and individuals per species, are necessary to elucidate plant species identity effects on the rhizosphere for co-occurring halophytes.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial community</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Firmicutes</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Halocnemum strobilaceum</subject><subject>Halophyte</subject><subject>Halophytes</subject><subject>Limonium</subject><subject>Lycium</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Proteobacteria</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoMottTe-ANkwBsRpuZjJx83QilaCwVB9DqcZE52s8xM1mSm0P56s922tObmhJOHh5e8hLxn9Ewppr7sEPP2rOuofkWOOZOq1aIzr5_dj8hpKVtaj-aSavGWHAnKtJRaH5PzX5t4lxz4GXOEofFpHJcpzhFLk0IT4g3WXZu8X3KO07rpsWCemw0Mabe5nbG8I28CDAVPH-YJ-fP92--LH-31z8uri_Pr1q8Un1vGOPa4AuadXjEW0PU9dQE4V9JooYMwYDy6YExNw5X2GrzkAKKjFWDihFwdvH2Crd3lOEK-tQmivV-kvLaQ5-gHtExwjZxTB2hWWE11SNc7qaiCoLvq-npw7RY3Yu9xmjMML6QvX6a4set0YyVjRtJ9mE8Pgpz-LlhmO8bicRhgwrQUyxmlgivTqYp-_A_dpiVP9assp0YJpaTklfp8oHxOpWQMT2EYtfui7X3Rdl90hT88j_-EPtYq_gFLO6VC</recordid><startdate>20180830</startdate><enddate>20180830</enddate><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Kong, Yan</creator><creator>Teng, Dexiong</creator><creator>Zhang, Xueni</creator><creator>He, Xuemin</creator><creator>Zhang, Yang</creator><creator>Lv, Guanghui</creator><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180830</creationdate><title>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</title><author>Li, Yan ; Kong, Yan ; Teng, Dexiong ; Zhang, Xueni ; He, Xuemin ; Zhang, Yang ; Lv, Guanghui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial community</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Firmicutes</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Halocnemum strobilaceum</topic><topic>Halophyte</topic><topic>Halophytes</topic><topic>Limonium</topic><topic>Lycium</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Proteobacteria</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Dexiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xueni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xuemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Kong, Yan</au><au>Teng, Dexiong</au><au>Zhang, Xueni</au><au>He, Xuemin</au><au>Zhang, Yang</au><au>Lv, Guanghui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2018-08-30</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>e5508</spage><epage>e5508</epage><pages>e5508-e5508</pages><artnum>e5508</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas. Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed. Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of , and associated bacterial communities was lower than that of and communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of and was very different from those of and . The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients. Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies involving more halophyte species, and individuals per species, are necessary to elucidate plant species identity effects on the rhizosphere for co-occurring halophytes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ, Inc</pub><pmid>30186688</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.5508</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-8359
ispartof PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2018-08, Vol.6, p.e5508-e5508, Article e5508
issn 2167-8359
2167-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1328e220bae94e8c8e946bdb6707af85
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Bacteria
Bacterial community
Biology
Community composition
Community structure
Diversity
Ecology
Firmicutes
Flowers & plants
Halocnemum strobilaceum
Halophyte
Halophytes
Limonium
Lycium
Microbiology
Microorganisms
Nutrient content
Plant growth
Precipitation
Proteobacteria
Rhizosphere
rRNA 16S
Salinity
Salt
Soil microorganisms
Soil nutrients
Soil properties
Species
Studies
title Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rhizobacterial%20communities%20of%20five%20co-occurring%20desert%20halophytes&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Li,%20Yan&rft.date=2018-08-30&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=e5508&rft.epage=e5508&rft.pages=e5508-e5508&rft.artnum=e5508&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.5508&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2100327957%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097377662&rft_id=info:pmid/30186688&rfr_iscdi=true