Loading…
Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes
Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities assoc...
Saved in:
Published in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2018-08, Vol.6, p.e5508-e5508, Article e5508 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813 |
container_end_page | e5508 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e5508 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Li, Yan Kong, Yan Teng, Dexiong Zhang, Xueni He, Xuemin Zhang, Yang Lv, Guanghui |
description | Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas.
Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed.
Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of
,
and
associated bacterial communities was lower than that of
and
communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of
and
was very different from those of
and
. The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients.
Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.5508 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1328e220bae94e8c8e946bdb6707af85</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1328e220bae94e8c8e946bdb6707af85</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2100327957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoMottTe-ANkwBsRpuZjJx83QilaCwVB9DqcZE52s8xM1mSm0P56s922tObmhJOHh5e8hLxn9Ewppr7sEPP2rOuofkWOOZOq1aIzr5_dj8hpKVtaj-aSavGWHAnKtJRaH5PzX5t4lxz4GXOEofFpHJcpzhFLk0IT4g3WXZu8X3KO07rpsWCemw0Mabe5nbG8I28CDAVPH-YJ-fP92--LH-31z8uri_Pr1q8Un1vGOPa4AuadXjEW0PU9dQE4V9JooYMwYDy6YExNw5X2GrzkAKKjFWDihFwdvH2Crd3lOEK-tQmivV-kvLaQ5-gHtExwjZxTB2hWWE11SNc7qaiCoLvq-npw7RY3Yu9xmjMML6QvX6a4set0YyVjRtJ9mE8Pgpz-LlhmO8bicRhgwrQUyxmlgivTqYp-_A_dpiVP9assp0YJpaTklfp8oHxOpWQMT2EYtfui7X3Rdl90hT88j_-EPtYq_gFLO6VC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097377662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Yan ; Kong, Yan ; Teng, Dexiong ; Zhang, Xueni ; He, Xuemin ; Zhang, Yang ; Lv, Guanghui</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan ; Kong, Yan ; Teng, Dexiong ; Zhang, Xueni ; He, Xuemin ; Zhang, Yang ; Lv, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas.
Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed.
Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of
,
and
associated bacterial communities was lower than that of
and
communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of
and
was very different from those of
and
. The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients.
Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies involving more halophyte species, and individuals per species, are necessary to elucidate plant species identity effects on the rhizosphere for co-occurring halophytes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30186688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacterial community ; Biology ; Community composition ; Community structure ; Diversity ; Ecology ; Firmicutes ; Flowers & plants ; Halocnemum strobilaceum ; Halophyte ; Halophytes ; Limonium ; Lycium ; Microbiology ; Microorganisms ; Nutrient content ; Plant growth ; Precipitation ; Proteobacteria ; Rhizosphere ; rRNA 16S ; Salinity ; Salt ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil nutrients ; Soil properties ; Species ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2018-08, Vol.6, p.e5508-e5508, Article e5508</ispartof><rights>2018 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Li et al. 2018 Li et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2097377662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2097377662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Dexiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xueni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xuemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><title>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas.
Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed.
Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of
,
and
associated bacterial communities was lower than that of
and
communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of
and
was very different from those of
and
. The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients.
Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies involving more halophyte species, and individuals per species, are necessary to elucidate plant species identity effects on the rhizosphere for co-occurring halophytes.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial community</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Firmicutes</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Halocnemum strobilaceum</subject><subject>Halophyte</subject><subject>Halophytes</subject><subject>Limonium</subject><subject>Lycium</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Proteobacteria</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoMottTe-ANkwBsRpuZjJx83QilaCwVB9DqcZE52s8xM1mSm0P56s922tObmhJOHh5e8hLxn9Ewppr7sEPP2rOuofkWOOZOq1aIzr5_dj8hpKVtaj-aSavGWHAnKtJRaH5PzX5t4lxz4GXOEofFpHJcpzhFLk0IT4g3WXZu8X3KO07rpsWCemw0Mabe5nbG8I28CDAVPH-YJ-fP92--LH-31z8uri_Pr1q8Un1vGOPa4AuadXjEW0PU9dQE4V9JooYMwYDy6YExNw5X2GrzkAKKjFWDihFwdvH2Crd3lOEK-tQmivV-kvLaQ5-gHtExwjZxTB2hWWE11SNc7qaiCoLvq-npw7RY3Yu9xmjMML6QvX6a4set0YyVjRtJ9mE8Pgpz-LlhmO8bicRhgwrQUyxmlgivTqYp-_A_dpiVP9assp0YJpaTklfp8oHxOpWQMT2EYtfui7X3Rdl90hT88j_-EPtYq_gFLO6VC</recordid><startdate>20180830</startdate><enddate>20180830</enddate><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Kong, Yan</creator><creator>Teng, Dexiong</creator><creator>Zhang, Xueni</creator><creator>He, Xuemin</creator><creator>Zhang, Yang</creator><creator>Lv, Guanghui</creator><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180830</creationdate><title>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</title><author>Li, Yan ; Kong, Yan ; Teng, Dexiong ; Zhang, Xueni ; He, Xuemin ; Zhang, Yang ; Lv, Guanghui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial community</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Firmicutes</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Halocnemum strobilaceum</topic><topic>Halophyte</topic><topic>Halophytes</topic><topic>Limonium</topic><topic>Lycium</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Proteobacteria</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Dexiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xueni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xuemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Kong, Yan</au><au>Teng, Dexiong</au><au>Zhang, Xueni</au><au>He, Xuemin</au><au>Zhang, Yang</au><au>Lv, Guanghui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2018-08-30</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>e5508</spage><epage>e5508</epage><pages>e5508-e5508</pages><artnum>e5508</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Recently, researches have begun to investigate the microbial communities associated with halophytes. Both rhizobacterial community composition and the environmental drivers of community assembly have been addressed. However, few studies have explored the structure of rhizobacterial communities associated with halophytic plants that are co-occurring in arid, salinized areas.
Five halophytes were selected for study: these co-occurred in saline soils in the Ebinur Lake Nature Reserve, located at the western margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Halophyte-associated bacterial communities were sampled, and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. The bacterial community diversity and structure were compared between the rhizosphere and bulk soils, as well as among the rhizosphere samples. The effects of plant species identity and soil properties on the bacterial communities were also analyzed.
Significant differences were observed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial communities. Diversity was higher in the rhizosphere than in the bulk soils. Abundant taxonomic groups (from phylum to genus) in the rhizosphere were much more diverse than in bulk soils. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla in the rhizosphere, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were common in bulk soils. Overall, the bacterial community composition were not significantly differentiated between the bulk soils of the five plants, but community diversity and structure differed significantly in the rhizosphere. The diversity of
,
and
associated bacterial communities was lower than that of
and
communities. Furthermore, the composition of the bacterial communities of
and
was very different from those of
and
. The diversity and community structure were influenced by soil EC, pH and nutrient content (TOC, SOM, TON and AP); of these, the effects of EC on bacterial community composition were less important than those of soil nutrients.
Halophytic plant species played an important role in shaping associated rhizosphere bacterial communities. When salinity levels were constant, soil nutrients emerged as key factors structuring bacterial communities, while EC played only a minor role. Pairwise differences among the rhizobacterial communities associated with different plant species were not significant, despite some evidence of differentiation. Further studies involving more halophyte species, and individuals per species, are necessary to elucidate plant species identity effects on the rhizosphere for co-occurring halophytes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ, Inc</pub><pmid>30186688</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.5508</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2018-08, Vol.6, p.e5508-e5508, Article e5508 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1328e220bae94e8c8e946bdb6707af85 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Bacteria Bacterial community Biology Community composition Community structure Diversity Ecology Firmicutes Flowers & plants Halocnemum strobilaceum Halophyte Halophytes Limonium Lycium Microbiology Microorganisms Nutrient content Plant growth Precipitation Proteobacteria Rhizosphere rRNA 16S Salinity Salt Soil microorganisms Soil nutrients Soil properties Species Studies |
title | Rhizobacterial communities of five co-occurring desert halophytes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rhizobacterial%20communities%20of%20five%20co-occurring%20desert%20halophytes&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Li,%20Yan&rft.date=2018-08-30&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=e5508&rft.epage=e5508&rft.pages=e5508-e5508&rft.artnum=e5508&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.5508&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2100327957%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-112ede4a1cb8411febdd0bfa22769838f39a9cebf99bac278c8ac62aa35069813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097377662&rft_id=info:pmid/30186688&rfr_iscdi=true |