Loading…

Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption

The adsorption of quinoline from wastewater by coking coal (AC-1), HCl-modified coking coal (AC-2), HNO3-modified coking coal (AC-3), HF-modified coking coal (AC-4), and H2SO4-modified coking coals (AC-5) was investigated in this paper. The effects of acid-modified concentration, modification time,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ACS omega 2019-12, Vol.4 (24), p.20503-20508
Main Authors: Xu, Hongxiang, Wang, Penghui, Ning, Kejia, Deng, Jiushuai, Zhuo, Qiming, Liu, Guowei
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13
container_end_page 20508
container_issue 24
container_start_page 20503
container_title ACS omega
container_volume 4
creator Xu, Hongxiang
Wang, Penghui
Ning, Kejia
Deng, Jiushuai
Zhuo, Qiming
Liu, Guowei
description The adsorption of quinoline from wastewater by coking coal (AC-1), HCl-modified coking coal (AC-2), HNO3-modified coking coal (AC-3), HF-modified coking coal (AC-4), and H2SO4-modified coking coals (AC-5) was investigated in this paper. The effects of acid-modified concentration, modification time, and adsorption time versus quinoline removal rate were studied by batch experiments. The quinoline concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry, the average pore size and specific surface area of coking coal before and after modification were characterized through static nitrogen adsorption, the mineral composition of coking coal was tested by X-ray diffraction, the surface functional groups were tested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the surface topography was tested using a scanning electron microscope. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of coking coals was the best when both the modification time was 120 min and the acid-modified concentration was 0.1 mol·L–1 and the quinoline removal rate reaches the highest when the adsorption time was 120 min. The specific surface area of AC-2 increased from 2.898 to 3.637 m2·g–1, and the removal rate of quinoline increased from 77.64 to 90.61%. Acids reacted with inorganic mineral impurities within coking coal such as hydrogen vanadium phosphate hydrate, which caused an increase in the specific surface area. A new peak appeared in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy pattern at the wavenumber 2300 cm–1. The surface of coking coal modified by acids was rougher than that of AC-1. The adsorption capacity of coking coal was improved after modification, and modified coking coals have the highest potential as low-cost adsorbents for quinoline removal.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acsomega.9b02213
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_132f6366f0794f2e96550c811dc85b28</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_132f6366f0794f2e96550c811dc85b28</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2329736205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PGzEQhq0KVFDg3lO1xx5YOrZ37fUFKUr5koIQEj1bXn-kDhs7tXcr8e9xm4Dg0NOMPO88M-MXoS8YzjEQ_F3pHDd2pc5FD4Rg-gkdk4ZDjWlDD97lR-g05zUAYNaRjrDP6Ijiru2ANsfo6tI5q8cquuqHL2myYazm2pv6LhrvvDXVIj75sCpBDbmKoXqYfIiDD7aamxzTdvQxnKBDV8r2dB9n6OfV5ePipl7eX98u5staNUKMNS1bEK4wNJoTymjfc4EbzKhTWikg2lDQrMXGcsUp6wRjwrre6NYKZxymM3S745qo1nKb_EalZxmVl_8eYlpJlUavBysxJY5Rxhxw0ThiBWtb0B3GRndtT7rCutixtlO_sUaXy5MaPkA_VoL_JVfxj2QCGOesAL7tASn-nmwe5cZnbYdBBRunLAklolxBoC1S2El1ijkn697GYJB_3ZSvbsq9m6Xl6_v13hpevSuCs52gtMp1nFIoP_9_3gsC06pt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329736205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption</title><source>American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Xu, Hongxiang ; Wang, Penghui ; Ning, Kejia ; Deng, Jiushuai ; Zhuo, Qiming ; Liu, Guowei</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hongxiang ; Wang, Penghui ; Ning, Kejia ; Deng, Jiushuai ; Zhuo, Qiming ; Liu, Guowei</creatorcontrib><description>The adsorption of quinoline from wastewater by coking coal (AC-1), HCl-modified coking coal (AC-2), HNO3-modified coking coal (AC-3), HF-modified coking coal (AC-4), and H2SO4-modified coking coals (AC-5) was investigated in this paper. The effects of acid-modified concentration, modification time, and adsorption time versus quinoline removal rate were studied by batch experiments. The quinoline concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry, the average pore size and specific surface area of coking coal before and after modification were characterized through static nitrogen adsorption, the mineral composition of coking coal was tested by X-ray diffraction, the surface functional groups were tested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the surface topography was tested using a scanning electron microscope. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of coking coals was the best when both the modification time was 120 min and the acid-modified concentration was 0.1 mol·L–1 and the quinoline removal rate reaches the highest when the adsorption time was 120 min. The specific surface area of AC-2 increased from 2.898 to 3.637 m2·g–1, and the removal rate of quinoline increased from 77.64 to 90.61%. Acids reacted with inorganic mineral impurities within coking coal such as hydrogen vanadium phosphate hydrate, which caused an increase in the specific surface area. A new peak appeared in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy pattern at the wavenumber 2300 cm–1. The surface of coking coal modified by acids was rougher than that of AC-1. The adsorption capacity of coking coal was improved after modification, and modified coking coals have the highest potential as low-cost adsorbents for quinoline removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-1343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-1343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02213</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31858034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>ACS omega, 2019-12, Vol.4 (24), p.20503-20508</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society 2019 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6280-3736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.9b02213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.9b02213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27079,27923,27924,53790,53792,56761,56811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hongxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Penghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Kejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jiushuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Qiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Guowei</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption</title><title>ACS omega</title><addtitle>ACS Omega</addtitle><description>The adsorption of quinoline from wastewater by coking coal (AC-1), HCl-modified coking coal (AC-2), HNO3-modified coking coal (AC-3), HF-modified coking coal (AC-4), and H2SO4-modified coking coals (AC-5) was investigated in this paper. The effects of acid-modified concentration, modification time, and adsorption time versus quinoline removal rate were studied by batch experiments. The quinoline concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry, the average pore size and specific surface area of coking coal before and after modification were characterized through static nitrogen adsorption, the mineral composition of coking coal was tested by X-ray diffraction, the surface functional groups were tested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the surface topography was tested using a scanning electron microscope. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of coking coals was the best when both the modification time was 120 min and the acid-modified concentration was 0.1 mol·L–1 and the quinoline removal rate reaches the highest when the adsorption time was 120 min. The specific surface area of AC-2 increased from 2.898 to 3.637 m2·g–1, and the removal rate of quinoline increased from 77.64 to 90.61%. Acids reacted with inorganic mineral impurities within coking coal such as hydrogen vanadium phosphate hydrate, which caused an increase in the specific surface area. A new peak appeared in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy pattern at the wavenumber 2300 cm–1. The surface of coking coal modified by acids was rougher than that of AC-1. The adsorption capacity of coking coal was improved after modification, and modified coking coals have the highest potential as low-cost adsorbents for quinoline removal.</description><issn>2470-1343</issn><issn>2470-1343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N~.</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PGzEQhq0KVFDg3lO1xx5YOrZ37fUFKUr5koIQEj1bXn-kDhs7tXcr8e9xm4Dg0NOMPO88M-MXoS8YzjEQ_F3pHDd2pc5FD4Rg-gkdk4ZDjWlDD97lR-g05zUAYNaRjrDP6Ijiru2ANsfo6tI5q8cquuqHL2myYazm2pv6LhrvvDXVIj75sCpBDbmKoXqYfIiDD7aamxzTdvQxnKBDV8r2dB9n6OfV5ePipl7eX98u5staNUKMNS1bEK4wNJoTymjfc4EbzKhTWikg2lDQrMXGcsUp6wRjwrre6NYKZxymM3S745qo1nKb_EalZxmVl_8eYlpJlUavBysxJY5Rxhxw0ThiBWtb0B3GRndtT7rCutixtlO_sUaXy5MaPkA_VoL_JVfxj2QCGOesAL7tASn-nmwe5cZnbYdBBRunLAklolxBoC1S2El1ijkn697GYJB_3ZSvbsq9m6Xl6_v13hpevSuCs52gtMp1nFIoP_9_3gsC06pt</recordid><startdate>20191210</startdate><enddate>20191210</enddate><creator>Xu, Hongxiang</creator><creator>Wang, Penghui</creator><creator>Ning, Kejia</creator><creator>Deng, Jiushuai</creator><creator>Zhuo, Qiming</creator><creator>Liu, Guowei</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>N~.</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-3736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191210</creationdate><title>Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption</title><author>Xu, Hongxiang ; Wang, Penghui ; Ning, Kejia ; Deng, Jiushuai ; Zhuo, Qiming ; Liu, Guowei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hongxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Penghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Kejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jiushuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Qiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Guowei</creatorcontrib><collection>American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>ACS omega</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Hongxiang</au><au>Wang, Penghui</au><au>Ning, Kejia</au><au>Deng, Jiushuai</au><au>Zhuo, Qiming</au><au>Liu, Guowei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption</atitle><jtitle>ACS omega</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Omega</addtitle><date>2019-12-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>20503</spage><epage>20508</epage><pages>20503-20508</pages><issn>2470-1343</issn><eissn>2470-1343</eissn><abstract>The adsorption of quinoline from wastewater by coking coal (AC-1), HCl-modified coking coal (AC-2), HNO3-modified coking coal (AC-3), HF-modified coking coal (AC-4), and H2SO4-modified coking coals (AC-5) was investigated in this paper. The effects of acid-modified concentration, modification time, and adsorption time versus quinoline removal rate were studied by batch experiments. The quinoline concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry, the average pore size and specific surface area of coking coal before and after modification were characterized through static nitrogen adsorption, the mineral composition of coking coal was tested by X-ray diffraction, the surface functional groups were tested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the surface topography was tested using a scanning electron microscope. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of coking coals was the best when both the modification time was 120 min and the acid-modified concentration was 0.1 mol·L–1 and the quinoline removal rate reaches the highest when the adsorption time was 120 min. The specific surface area of AC-2 increased from 2.898 to 3.637 m2·g–1, and the removal rate of quinoline increased from 77.64 to 90.61%. Acids reacted with inorganic mineral impurities within coking coal such as hydrogen vanadium phosphate hydrate, which caused an increase in the specific surface area. A new peak appeared in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy pattern at the wavenumber 2300 cm–1. The surface of coking coal modified by acids was rougher than that of AC-1. The adsorption capacity of coking coal was improved after modification, and modified coking coals have the highest potential as low-cost adsorbents for quinoline removal.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31858034</pmid><doi>10.1021/acsomega.9b02213</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-3736</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2470-1343
ispartof ACS omega, 2019-12, Vol.4 (24), p.20503-20508
issn 2470-1343
2470-1343
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_132f6366f0794f2e96550c811dc85b28
source American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access; PubMed Central
title Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A19%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Different%20Acid-Modified%20Coking%20Coals%20on%20Quinoline%20Adsorption&rft.jtitle=ACS%20omega&rft.au=Xu,%20Hongxiang&rft.date=2019-12-10&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=20503&rft.epage=20508&rft.pages=20503-20508&rft.issn=2470-1343&rft.eissn=2470-1343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsomega.9b02213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2329736205%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-300027a104c72363bb7914163facaa02cd30c651de7a73689669efbdc5e9fdf13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329736205&rft_id=info:pmid/31858034&rfr_iscdi=true