Loading…

Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas

Landslides are one of the most damaging geological hazards in mountainous regions such as the Himalayas. The Himalayan region is, tectonically, the most active region in the world that is highly vulnerable to landslides and associated hazards. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is a useful tool...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences (Basel) 2019-08, Vol.9 (8), p.360
Main Authors: Meena, Sansar Raj, Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 360
container_title Geosciences (Basel)
container_volume 9
creator Meena, Sansar Raj
Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah
description Landslides are one of the most damaging geological hazards in mountainous regions such as the Himalayas. The Himalayan region is, tectonically, the most active region in the world that is highly vulnerable to landslides and associated hazards. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is a useful tool for understanding the probability of the spatial distribution of future landslide regions. In this research, the landslide inventory datasets were collected during the field study of the Kullu valley in July 2018, and 149 landslide locations were collected as global positioning system (GPS) points. The present study evaluates the LSM using three different spatial resolution of the digital elevation model (DEM) derived from three different sources. The data-driven traditional frequency ratio (FR) model was used for this study. The FR model was used for this research to assess the impact of the different spatial resolution of DEMs on the LSM. DEM data was derived from Advanced Land Observing Satellite-1 (ALOS) Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) ALOS-PALSAR for 12.5 m, the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global for 30 m, and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) for 90 m. As an input, we used eight landslide conditioning factors based on the study area and topographic features of the Kullu valley in the Himalayas. The ASTER-Global 30m DEM showed higher accuracy of 0.910 compared to 0.839 for 12.5 m and 0.824 for 90 m DEM resolution. This study shows that that 30 m resolution is better suited for LSM for the Kullu valley region in the Himalayas. The LSM can be used for mitigation and future planning for spatial planners and developmental authorities in the region.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/geosciences9080360
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1373115f3b0f482eb97f411d230766b2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1373115f3b0f482eb97f411d230766b2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548494134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUU1rGzEQXUoLDUn-QE-CXutW0sj70Vtwk9rEodC0vYqxNDIyymq70gb2nh8eJS4h0LnM483w3jCvqj4I_hmg41_2FJPx1BtKHW851PxNdSJ5Uy9A1vD2FX5fnad04KU6AS2ok-phczegySw6djtg9hjYT0oxTNnH_on95vc-F_Yy0D0-kzfRUmAFbLG3KXhL7HZKhobsdz74PLMbHAbf77-yC7bCVMZ5sjPzPbueQpjYHwyB5k9s7e8w4IzprHrnMCQ6_9dPq99Xl79W68X2x_fN6mK7QMXbvEBrnGhMYyQHDo1TCtAIpGWBzrqOIzhq64LB1USytrxpoWtJqKVqLMBptTnq2ogHPYzFf5x1RK-fiTjuNY7Zm0BaQANCLB3suFOtpF1XTISwEsov650sWh-PWsMY_06Usj7EaezL-VouVas6JUCVLXncMmNMaST34iq4fgpP_x8ePALbfY_h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548494134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Meena, Sansar Raj ; Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</creator><creatorcontrib>Meena, Sansar Raj ; Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</creatorcontrib><description>Landslides are one of the most damaging geological hazards in mountainous regions such as the Himalayas. The Himalayan region is, tectonically, the most active region in the world that is highly vulnerable to landslides and associated hazards. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is a useful tool for understanding the probability of the spatial distribution of future landslide regions. In this research, the landslide inventory datasets were collected during the field study of the Kullu valley in July 2018, and 149 landslide locations were collected as global positioning system (GPS) points. The present study evaluates the LSM using three different spatial resolution of the digital elevation model (DEM) derived from three different sources. The data-driven traditional frequency ratio (FR) model was used for this study. The FR model was used for this research to assess the impact of the different spatial resolution of DEMs on the LSM. DEM data was derived from Advanced Land Observing Satellite-1 (ALOS) Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) ALOS-PALSAR for 12.5 m, the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global for 30 m, and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) for 90 m. As an input, we used eight landslide conditioning factors based on the study area and topographic features of the Kullu valley in the Himalayas. The ASTER-Global 30m DEM showed higher accuracy of 0.910 compared to 0.839 for 12.5 m and 0.824 for 90 m DEM resolution. This study shows that that 30 m resolution is better suited for LSM for the Kullu valley region in the Himalayas. The LSM can be used for mitigation and future planning for spatial planners and developmental authorities in the region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/geosciences9080360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; ALOS-PALSAR ; ASTER ; ASTER (radiometer) ; Digital Elevation Models ; Earth science ; Elevation ; frequency ratio (FR) ; Geographic information systems ; Geological hazards ; Geology ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) ; Landslides ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Lithology ; Mapping ; Mitigation ; Mountain regions ; natural hazards ; Phased arrays ; Physiographic features ; Positioning systems ; Probability theory ; Radar ; Radiometers ; Regions ; Resolution ; SAR (radar) ; Satellite observation ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial distribution ; Spatial resolution ; SRTM ; Synthetic aperture radar ; Thermal emission ; Topography ; Valleys</subject><ispartof>Geosciences (Basel), 2019-08, Vol.9 (8), p.360</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6175-6491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548494134/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548494134?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meena, Sansar Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas</title><title>Geosciences (Basel)</title><description>Landslides are one of the most damaging geological hazards in mountainous regions such as the Himalayas. The Himalayan region is, tectonically, the most active region in the world that is highly vulnerable to landslides and associated hazards. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is a useful tool for understanding the probability of the spatial distribution of future landslide regions. In this research, the landslide inventory datasets were collected during the field study of the Kullu valley in July 2018, and 149 landslide locations were collected as global positioning system (GPS) points. The present study evaluates the LSM using three different spatial resolution of the digital elevation model (DEM) derived from three different sources. The data-driven traditional frequency ratio (FR) model was used for this study. The FR model was used for this research to assess the impact of the different spatial resolution of DEMs on the LSM. DEM data was derived from Advanced Land Observing Satellite-1 (ALOS) Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) ALOS-PALSAR for 12.5 m, the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global for 30 m, and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) for 90 m. As an input, we used eight landslide conditioning factors based on the study area and topographic features of the Kullu valley in the Himalayas. The ASTER-Global 30m DEM showed higher accuracy of 0.910 compared to 0.839 for 12.5 m and 0.824 for 90 m DEM resolution. This study shows that that 30 m resolution is better suited for LSM for the Kullu valley region in the Himalayas. The LSM can be used for mitigation and future planning for spatial planners and developmental authorities in the region.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>ALOS-PALSAR</subject><subject>ASTER</subject><subject>ASTER (radiometer)</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>frequency ratio (FR)</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM)</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>natural hazards</subject><subject>Phased arrays</subject><subject>Physiographic features</subject><subject>Positioning systems</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radiometers</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>SAR (radar)</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>SRTM</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>Thermal emission</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><issn>2076-3263</issn><issn>2076-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplUU1rGzEQXUoLDUn-QE-CXutW0sj70Vtwk9rEodC0vYqxNDIyymq70gb2nh8eJS4h0LnM483w3jCvqj4I_hmg41_2FJPx1BtKHW851PxNdSJ5Uy9A1vD2FX5fnad04KU6AS2ok-phczegySw6djtg9hjYT0oxTNnH_on95vc-F_Yy0D0-kzfRUmAFbLG3KXhL7HZKhobsdz74PLMbHAbf77-yC7bCVMZ5sjPzPbueQpjYHwyB5k9s7e8w4IzprHrnMCQ6_9dPq99Xl79W68X2x_fN6mK7QMXbvEBrnGhMYyQHDo1TCtAIpGWBzrqOIzhq64LB1USytrxpoWtJqKVqLMBptTnq2ogHPYzFf5x1RK-fiTjuNY7Zm0BaQANCLB3suFOtpF1XTISwEsov650sWh-PWsMY_06Usj7EaezL-VouVas6JUCVLXncMmNMaST34iq4fgpP_x8ePALbfY_h</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Meena, Sansar Raj</creator><creator>Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-6491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas</title><author>Meena, Sansar Raj ; Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>ALOS-PALSAR</topic><topic>ASTER</topic><topic>ASTER (radiometer)</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>frequency ratio (FR)</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM)</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>natural hazards</topic><topic>Phased arrays</topic><topic>Physiographic features</topic><topic>Positioning systems</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radiometers</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>SAR (radar)</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>SRTM</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>Thermal emission</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meena, Sansar Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geosciences (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meena, Sansar Raj</au><au>Gudiyangada Nachappa, Thimmaiah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas</atitle><jtitle>Geosciences (Basel)</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>360</spage><pages>360-</pages><issn>2076-3263</issn><eissn>2076-3263</eissn><abstract>Landslides are one of the most damaging geological hazards in mountainous regions such as the Himalayas. The Himalayan region is, tectonically, the most active region in the world that is highly vulnerable to landslides and associated hazards. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is a useful tool for understanding the probability of the spatial distribution of future landslide regions. In this research, the landslide inventory datasets were collected during the field study of the Kullu valley in July 2018, and 149 landslide locations were collected as global positioning system (GPS) points. The present study evaluates the LSM using three different spatial resolution of the digital elevation model (DEM) derived from three different sources. The data-driven traditional frequency ratio (FR) model was used for this study. The FR model was used for this research to assess the impact of the different spatial resolution of DEMs on the LSM. DEM data was derived from Advanced Land Observing Satellite-1 (ALOS) Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) ALOS-PALSAR for 12.5 m, the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global for 30 m, and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) for 90 m. As an input, we used eight landslide conditioning factors based on the study area and topographic features of the Kullu valley in the Himalayas. The ASTER-Global 30m DEM showed higher accuracy of 0.910 compared to 0.839 for 12.5 m and 0.824 for 90 m DEM resolution. This study shows that that 30 m resolution is better suited for LSM for the Kullu valley region in the Himalayas. The LSM can be used for mitigation and future planning for spatial planners and developmental authorities in the region.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/geosciences9080360</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-6491</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3263
ispartof Geosciences (Basel), 2019-08, Vol.9 (8), p.360
issn 2076-3263
2076-3263
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1373115f3b0f482eb97f411d230766b2
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
ALOS-PALSAR
ASTER
ASTER (radiometer)
Digital Elevation Models
Earth science
Elevation
frequency ratio (FR)
Geographic information systems
Geological hazards
Geology
Global positioning systems
GPS
landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM)
Landslides
Landslides & mudslides
Lithology
Mapping
Mitigation
Mountain regions
natural hazards
Phased arrays
Physiographic features
Positioning systems
Probability theory
Radar
Radiometers
Regions
Resolution
SAR (radar)
Satellite observation
Spatial discrimination
Spatial distribution
Spatial resolution
SRTM
Synthetic aperture radar
Thermal emission
Topography
Valleys
title Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Spatial%20Resolution%20of%20Digital%20Elevation%20Model%20on%20Landslide%20Susceptibility%20Mapping:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20Kullu%20Valley,%20Himalayas&rft.jtitle=Geosciences%20(Basel)&rft.au=Meena,%20Sansar%20Raj&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=360&rft.pages=360-&rft.issn=2076-3263&rft.eissn=2076-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/geosciences9080360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2548494134%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a408t-adcf17c7c203037f443ac1ae57f4fdf90a3fe864fd3f6ee26d078398e14547d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548494134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true