Loading…

JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0

We cross-check the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Cepheid/Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) distance ladder, which yields the most precise local H _0 , against early James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) subsamples (∼1/4 of the HST sample) from SH0ES and CCHP, calibrated only with NGC 4258. We find HST Cepheid di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical journal 2024-12, Vol.977 (1), p.120
Main Authors: Riess, Adam G., Scolnic, Dan, Anand, Gagandeep S., Breuval, Louise, Casertano, Stefano, Macri, Lucas M., Li, Siyang, Yuan, Wenlong, Huang, Caroline D., Jha, Saurabh, Murakami, Yukei S., Beaton, Rachael, Brout, Dillon, Wu, Tianrui, Addison, Graeme E., Bennett, Charles, Anderson, Richard I., Filippenko, Alexei V., Carr, Anthony
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 120
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 977
creator Riess, Adam G.
Scolnic, Dan
Anand, Gagandeep S.
Breuval, Louise
Casertano, Stefano
Macri, Lucas M.
Li, Siyang
Yuan, Wenlong
Huang, Caroline D.
Jha, Saurabh
Murakami, Yukei S.
Beaton, Rachael
Brout, Dillon
Wu, Tianrui
Addison, Graeme E.
Bennett, Charles
Anderson, Richard I.
Filippenko, Alexei V.
Carr, Anthony
description We cross-check the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Cepheid/Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) distance ladder, which yields the most precise local H _0 , against early James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) subsamples (∼1/4 of the HST sample) from SH0ES and CCHP, calibrated only with NGC 4258. We find HST Cepheid distances agree well (∼1 σ ) with all combinations of methods, samples, and telescopes. The comparisons explicitly include the measurement uncertainty of each method in NGC 4258, an oft-neglected but dominant term. Mean differences are ∼0.03 mag, far smaller than the 0.18 mag “Hubble tension.” Combining all measures produces the strongest constraint yet on the linearity of HST Cepheid distances, 0.994 ±0.010, ruling out distance-dependent bias or offset as the source of the tension at ∼7 σ . However, current JWST subsamples produce large sampling differences in H _0 whose size and direction we can directly estimate from the full HST set. We show that Δ H _0 ∼ 2.5 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 between the CCHP JWST program and the full HST sample is entirely consistent with differences in sample selection. We combine all JWST samples into a new distance-limited set of 16 SNe Ia at D ≤ 25 Mpc. Using JWST Cepheids, JAGB, and tip of the red giant branch, we find 73.4 ± 2.1, 72.2 ± 2.2, and 72.1 ± 2.2 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 , respectively. Explicitly accounting for common supernovae, the three-method JWST result is H _0 = 72.6 ± 2.0, similar to H _0 = 72.8 expected from HST Cepheids in the same galaxies. The small JWST sample trivially lowers the Hubble tension significance due to small-sample statistics and is not yet competitive with the HST set (42 SNe Ia and 4 anchors), which yields 73.2 ± 0.9. Still, the joint JWST sample provides important cross-checks that the HST data pass.
doi_str_mv 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c21
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_141c737148154d73939f2dcd142b1342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_141c737148154d73939f2dcd142b1342</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>apjad8c21</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d188t-bfe3b1b22b751e096324db5f1527cc1b5659f4ba2bc00d928f441b9038800f363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctOwzAQRS0EEqWwZ-kPINSvJDY7VAotKmLR8thZfiJXaRzFKYIN307SIlYz90pz5moGgEuMriln5QTnlGeM5uVEWW4IPgKjf-sYjBBCLCto-X4KzlLaDJIIMQI_j2-rNXxVVbCqcwnOe3UXUqdq4-CTU2nXuq2ru3QDV65ypguxhtHD1a5xbR0_Vd_ppLZN5eDsq6lUqFMP8N61rkckGGq4XzFLXdjuV_TTy2hUBecQnYMTr6rkLv7qGLzcz9bTebZ8flhMb5eZxZx3mfaOaqwJ0WWOHRIFJczq3OOclMZgnRe58Ewrog1CVhDuGcNaIMo5Qp4WdAwWB66NaiObto_Sfsuogtwbsf2Qqu2CqZzEDJuSlphxnDNbUkGFJ9ZYzIjGlJGedXVghdjITdy1dZ9cYiSHP8jh6HI4ujz8gf4CKxx6DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Riess, Adam G. ; Scolnic, Dan ; Anand, Gagandeep S. ; Breuval, Louise ; Casertano, Stefano ; Macri, Lucas M. ; Li, Siyang ; Yuan, Wenlong ; Huang, Caroline D. ; Jha, Saurabh ; Murakami, Yukei S. ; Beaton, Rachael ; Brout, Dillon ; Wu, Tianrui ; Addison, Graeme E. ; Bennett, Charles ; Anderson, Richard I. ; Filippenko, Alexei V. ; Carr, Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Riess, Adam G. ; Scolnic, Dan ; Anand, Gagandeep S. ; Breuval, Louise ; Casertano, Stefano ; Macri, Lucas M. ; Li, Siyang ; Yuan, Wenlong ; Huang, Caroline D. ; Jha, Saurabh ; Murakami, Yukei S. ; Beaton, Rachael ; Brout, Dillon ; Wu, Tianrui ; Addison, Graeme E. ; Bennett, Charles ; Anderson, Richard I. ; Filippenko, Alexei V. ; Carr, Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>We cross-check the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Cepheid/Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) distance ladder, which yields the most precise local H _0 , against early James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) subsamples (∼1/4 of the HST sample) from SH0ES and CCHP, calibrated only with NGC 4258. We find HST Cepheid distances agree well (∼1 σ ) with all combinations of methods, samples, and telescopes. The comparisons explicitly include the measurement uncertainty of each method in NGC 4258, an oft-neglected but dominant term. Mean differences are ∼0.03 mag, far smaller than the 0.18 mag “Hubble tension.” Combining all measures produces the strongest constraint yet on the linearity of HST Cepheid distances, 0.994 ±0.010, ruling out distance-dependent bias or offset as the source of the tension at ∼7 σ . However, current JWST subsamples produce large sampling differences in H _0 whose size and direction we can directly estimate from the full HST set. We show that Δ H _0 ∼ 2.5 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 between the CCHP JWST program and the full HST sample is entirely consistent with differences in sample selection. We combine all JWST samples into a new distance-limited set of 16 SNe Ia at D ≤ 25 Mpc. Using JWST Cepheids, JAGB, and tip of the red giant branch, we find 73.4 ± 2.1, 72.2 ± 2.2, and 72.1 ± 2.2 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 , respectively. Explicitly accounting for common supernovae, the three-method JWST result is H _0 = 72.6 ± 2.0, similar to H _0 = 72.8 expected from HST Cepheids in the same galaxies. The small JWST sample trivially lowers the Hubble tension significance due to small-sample statistics and is not yet competitive with the HST set (42 SNe Ia and 4 anchors), which yields 73.2 ± 0.9. Still, the joint JWST sample provides important cross-checks that the HST data pass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Cepheid distance ; Cosmological parameters ; Distance indicators ; Hubble constant ; James Webb Space Telescope</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2024-12, Vol.977 (1), p.120</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3889-7709 ; 0000-0001-8839-7206 ; 0000-0002-6124-1196 ; 0000-0001-8738-6011 ; 0000-0003-3460-0103 ; 0000-0002-1775-4859 ; 0000-0001-6169-8586 ; 0000-0002-1691-8217 ; 0000-0002-2147-2248 ; 0000-0003-4074-5659 ; 0000-0002-8342-3804 ; 0000-0002-4934-5849 ; 0000-0001-9420-6525 ; 0000-0001-5201-8374 ; 0000-0002-8623-1082 ; 0009-0008-4185-8798 ; 0000-0001-8089-4419 ; 0000-0002-5259-2314</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riess, Adam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scolnic, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Gagandeep S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuval, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casertano, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macri, Lucas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Siyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Wenlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Caroline D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yukei S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaton, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brout, Dillon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tianrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addison, Graeme E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Richard I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippenko, Alexei V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><addtitle>APJ</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><description>We cross-check the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Cepheid/Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) distance ladder, which yields the most precise local H _0 , against early James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) subsamples (∼1/4 of the HST sample) from SH0ES and CCHP, calibrated only with NGC 4258. We find HST Cepheid distances agree well (∼1 σ ) with all combinations of methods, samples, and telescopes. The comparisons explicitly include the measurement uncertainty of each method in NGC 4258, an oft-neglected but dominant term. Mean differences are ∼0.03 mag, far smaller than the 0.18 mag “Hubble tension.” Combining all measures produces the strongest constraint yet on the linearity of HST Cepheid distances, 0.994 ±0.010, ruling out distance-dependent bias or offset as the source of the tension at ∼7 σ . However, current JWST subsamples produce large sampling differences in H _0 whose size and direction we can directly estimate from the full HST set. We show that Δ H _0 ∼ 2.5 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 between the CCHP JWST program and the full HST sample is entirely consistent with differences in sample selection. We combine all JWST samples into a new distance-limited set of 16 SNe Ia at D ≤ 25 Mpc. Using JWST Cepheids, JAGB, and tip of the red giant branch, we find 73.4 ± 2.1, 72.2 ± 2.2, and 72.1 ± 2.2 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 , respectively. Explicitly accounting for common supernovae, the three-method JWST result is H _0 = 72.6 ± 2.0, similar to H _0 = 72.8 expected from HST Cepheids in the same galaxies. The small JWST sample trivially lowers the Hubble tension significance due to small-sample statistics and is not yet competitive with the HST set (42 SNe Ia and 4 anchors), which yields 73.2 ± 0.9. Still, the joint JWST sample provides important cross-checks that the HST data pass.</description><subject>Cepheid distance</subject><subject>Cosmological parameters</subject><subject>Distance indicators</subject><subject>Hubble constant</subject><subject>James Webb Space Telescope</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kctOwzAQRS0EEqWwZ-kPINSvJDY7VAotKmLR8thZfiJXaRzFKYIN307SIlYz90pz5moGgEuMriln5QTnlGeM5uVEWW4IPgKjf-sYjBBCLCto-X4KzlLaDJIIMQI_j2-rNXxVVbCqcwnOe3UXUqdq4-CTU2nXuq2ru3QDV65ypguxhtHD1a5xbR0_Vd_ppLZN5eDsq6lUqFMP8N61rkckGGq4XzFLXdjuV_TTy2hUBecQnYMTr6rkLv7qGLzcz9bTebZ8flhMb5eZxZx3mfaOaqwJ0WWOHRIFJczq3OOclMZgnRe58Ewrog1CVhDuGcNaIMo5Qp4WdAwWB66NaiObto_Sfsuogtwbsf2Qqu2CqZzEDJuSlphxnDNbUkGFJ9ZYzIjGlJGedXVghdjITdy1dZ9cYiSHP8jh6HI4ujz8gf4CKxx6DA</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Riess, Adam G.</creator><creator>Scolnic, Dan</creator><creator>Anand, Gagandeep S.</creator><creator>Breuval, Louise</creator><creator>Casertano, Stefano</creator><creator>Macri, Lucas M.</creator><creator>Li, Siyang</creator><creator>Yuan, Wenlong</creator><creator>Huang, Caroline D.</creator><creator>Jha, Saurabh</creator><creator>Murakami, Yukei S.</creator><creator>Beaton, Rachael</creator><creator>Brout, Dillon</creator><creator>Wu, Tianrui</creator><creator>Addison, Graeme E.</creator><creator>Bennett, Charles</creator><creator>Anderson, Richard I.</creator><creator>Filippenko, Alexei V.</creator><creator>Carr, Anthony</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-7709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-7206</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-1196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-6011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3460-0103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-4859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-8586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-8217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-2248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-5659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-3804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-5849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-6525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-8374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8623-1082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4185-8798</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-4419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-2314</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0</title><author>Riess, Adam G. ; Scolnic, Dan ; Anand, Gagandeep S. ; Breuval, Louise ; Casertano, Stefano ; Macri, Lucas M. ; Li, Siyang ; Yuan, Wenlong ; Huang, Caroline D. ; Jha, Saurabh ; Murakami, Yukei S. ; Beaton, Rachael ; Brout, Dillon ; Wu, Tianrui ; Addison, Graeme E. ; Bennett, Charles ; Anderson, Richard I. ; Filippenko, Alexei V. ; Carr, Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d188t-bfe3b1b22b751e096324db5f1527cc1b5659f4ba2bc00d928f441b9038800f363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cepheid distance</topic><topic>Cosmological parameters</topic><topic>Distance indicators</topic><topic>Hubble constant</topic><topic>James Webb Space Telescope</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riess, Adam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scolnic, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Gagandeep S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuval, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casertano, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macri, Lucas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Siyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Wenlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Caroline D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yukei S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaton, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brout, Dillon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tianrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addison, Graeme E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Richard I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippenko, Alexei V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riess, Adam G.</au><au>Scolnic, Dan</au><au>Anand, Gagandeep S.</au><au>Breuval, Louise</au><au>Casertano, Stefano</au><au>Macri, Lucas M.</au><au>Li, Siyang</au><au>Yuan, Wenlong</au><au>Huang, Caroline D.</au><au>Jha, Saurabh</au><au>Murakami, Yukei S.</au><au>Beaton, Rachael</au><au>Brout, Dillon</au><au>Wu, Tianrui</au><au>Addison, Graeme E.</au><au>Bennett, Charles</au><au>Anderson, Richard I.</au><au>Filippenko, Alexei V.</au><au>Carr, Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><stitle>APJ</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>977</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>120</spage><pages>120-</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>We cross-check the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Cepheid/Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) distance ladder, which yields the most precise local H _0 , against early James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) subsamples (∼1/4 of the HST sample) from SH0ES and CCHP, calibrated only with NGC 4258. We find HST Cepheid distances agree well (∼1 σ ) with all combinations of methods, samples, and telescopes. The comparisons explicitly include the measurement uncertainty of each method in NGC 4258, an oft-neglected but dominant term. Mean differences are ∼0.03 mag, far smaller than the 0.18 mag “Hubble tension.” Combining all measures produces the strongest constraint yet on the linearity of HST Cepheid distances, 0.994 ±0.010, ruling out distance-dependent bias or offset as the source of the tension at ∼7 σ . However, current JWST subsamples produce large sampling differences in H _0 whose size and direction we can directly estimate from the full HST set. We show that Δ H _0 ∼ 2.5 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 between the CCHP JWST program and the full HST sample is entirely consistent with differences in sample selection. We combine all JWST samples into a new distance-limited set of 16 SNe Ia at D ≤ 25 Mpc. Using JWST Cepheids, JAGB, and tip of the red giant branch, we find 73.4 ± 2.1, 72.2 ± 2.2, and 72.1 ± 2.2 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 , respectively. Explicitly accounting for common supernovae, the three-method JWST result is H _0 = 72.6 ± 2.0, similar to H _0 = 72.8 expected from HST Cepheids in the same galaxies. The small JWST sample trivially lowers the Hubble tension significance due to small-sample statistics and is not yet competitive with the HST set (42 SNe Ia and 4 anchors), which yields 73.2 ± 0.9. Still, the joint JWST sample provides important cross-checks that the HST data pass.</abstract><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c21</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-7709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-7206</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-1196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-6011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3460-0103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-4859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-8586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-8217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-2248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-5659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-3804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-5849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-6525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-8374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8623-1082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4185-8798</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-4419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-2314</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2024-12, Vol.977 (1), p.120
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_141c737148154d73939f2dcd142b1342
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Cepheid distance
Cosmological parameters
Distance indicators
Hubble constant
James Webb Space Telescope
title JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T03%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=JWST%20Validates%20HST%20Distance%20Measurements:%20Selection%20of%20Supernova%20Subsample%20Explains%20Differences%20in%20JWST%20Estimates%20of%20Local%20H%200&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Riess,%20Adam%20G.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=977&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.pages=120-&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c21&rft_dat=%3Ciop_doaj_%3Eapjad8c21%3C/iop_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d188t-bfe3b1b22b751e096324db5f1527cc1b5659f4ba2bc00d928f441b9038800f363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true