Loading…

Finding out the “gender” sooner: Ethical tensions and parental motivation in discovering fetal sex and chromosomal anomaly risk using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has rapidly expanded in both utilization and scope since it became available in 2011. While NIPT screens for a limited number of chromosomal anomalies, it has become colloquially known as the “gender” test because of the ability to determine sex chromosome informa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:SSM. Qualitative research in health 2024-06, Vol.5, p.100374, Article 100374
Main Authors: Owen, Aleksa, Allen Ratliff, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-149dfc1fb8e3064d9a5a6668a6724348a27b2b016875feed66632ffc717120953
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100374
container_title SSM. Qualitative research in health
container_volume 5
creator Owen, Aleksa
Allen Ratliff, G.
description Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has rapidly expanded in both utilization and scope since it became available in 2011. While NIPT screens for a limited number of chromosomal anomalies, it has become colloquially known as the “gender” test because of the ability to determine sex chromosome information. Yet users often report being less interested in learning about fetal risk for sex chromosome anomalies (SCAs). To date, most research with NIPT users has focused on those who receive “high risk” or “positive” results. Yet most NIPT users will receive “low risk” results. This is significant because NIPT continues to grow in popularity. To better understand how NIPT “test-negative” users report testing motivations, we analyzed semi-structured interviews with 37 NIPT users using constructivist grounded theory. Participants reported two motivations in using NIPT: 1) learning fetal sex information and 2) gaining “peace of mind” in confirming low risk of chromosomal anomaly, or disability. However, these motivations were also in tension with each other as users described gaining fetal sex information as a valued benefit that offset any anxiety or fear they experienced from participating in NIPT. These findings have implications for ongoing ethical debates over the role of fetal sex determination in NIPT and suggest that NIPT may also raise more subtle ethical challenges including the reinforcement of sex and gender binaries and the foreclosure of disability as familial possibility, revealing how epistemic shortcuts are at play within NIPT.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100374
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_14295d2589974de187c8f821377820fd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2667321523001580</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_14295d2589974de187c8f821377820fd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2667321523001580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-149dfc1fb8e3064d9a5a6668a6724348a27b2b016875feed66632ffc717120953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJKrSJ2DjJSyS-m_GHiQWqGpLpApYtGvLsa8Th4wdbHfU7vog8Ai8VJ8ET4Kqrrq61jk-n39O07wneE4w6U4385yHX2lOMWVVwUzwV80R7ToxY5S0r5-t3zYnOW8wxlQQTFt-1Py98MH6sELxtqCyBvT48HsFwUJ6fPiDcowB0id0Xtbe6C0qELKPISMdLNrpBKFUdYjFj7pUA_mArM8mjpAmqIPJz3C3D5h1ikPMcaiaDtO4R8nnn-g2T5tDDD6MOvsR0K6iddmfmMtkfvi2-HH98V3zxulthpP_87i5uTi_Pvs6u_p-uTj7cjUzrONlRnhvnSFuKYHhjttet7rrOqk7QTnjUlOxpMv6d1K0DsBWj1HnjCCCUNy37LhZHLg26o3aJT_odK-i9movxLRSOhVvtqAIp31raSv7XnALRAojnaSECSEpdray2IFlUsw5gXviEaymAtVG7QtUU4HqUGBNfT6koD5z9JBUNh6CAesTmFLv4V_M_wPFz6lX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finding out the “gender” sooner: Ethical tensions and parental motivation in discovering fetal sex and chromosomal anomaly risk using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Owen, Aleksa ; Allen Ratliff, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Owen, Aleksa ; Allen Ratliff, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has rapidly expanded in both utilization and scope since it became available in 2011. While NIPT screens for a limited number of chromosomal anomalies, it has become colloquially known as the “gender” test because of the ability to determine sex chromosome information. Yet users often report being less interested in learning about fetal risk for sex chromosome anomalies (SCAs). To date, most research with NIPT users has focused on those who receive “high risk” or “positive” results. Yet most NIPT users will receive “low risk” results. This is significant because NIPT continues to grow in popularity. To better understand how NIPT “test-negative” users report testing motivations, we analyzed semi-structured interviews with 37 NIPT users using constructivist grounded theory. Participants reported two motivations in using NIPT: 1) learning fetal sex information and 2) gaining “peace of mind” in confirming low risk of chromosomal anomaly, or disability. However, these motivations were also in tension with each other as users described gaining fetal sex information as a valued benefit that offset any anxiety or fear they experienced from participating in NIPT. These findings have implications for ongoing ethical debates over the role of fetal sex determination in NIPT and suggest that NIPT may also raise more subtle ethical challenges including the reinforcement of sex and gender binaries and the foreclosure of disability as familial possibility, revealing how epistemic shortcuts are at play within NIPT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2667-3215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2667-3215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cell-free DNA ; Disability ; Prenatal testing ; Providers ; Reproductive decision-making</subject><ispartof>SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2024-06, Vol.5, p.100374, Article 100374</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-149dfc1fb8e3064d9a5a6668a6724348a27b2b016875feed66632ffc717120953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3620-7081</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321523001580$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owen, Aleksa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen Ratliff, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Finding out the “gender” sooner: Ethical tensions and parental motivation in discovering fetal sex and chromosomal anomaly risk using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)</title><title>SSM. Qualitative research in health</title><description>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has rapidly expanded in both utilization and scope since it became available in 2011. While NIPT screens for a limited number of chromosomal anomalies, it has become colloquially known as the “gender” test because of the ability to determine sex chromosome information. Yet users often report being less interested in learning about fetal risk for sex chromosome anomalies (SCAs). To date, most research with NIPT users has focused on those who receive “high risk” or “positive” results. Yet most NIPT users will receive “low risk” results. This is significant because NIPT continues to grow in popularity. To better understand how NIPT “test-negative” users report testing motivations, we analyzed semi-structured interviews with 37 NIPT users using constructivist grounded theory. Participants reported two motivations in using NIPT: 1) learning fetal sex information and 2) gaining “peace of mind” in confirming low risk of chromosomal anomaly, or disability. However, these motivations were also in tension with each other as users described gaining fetal sex information as a valued benefit that offset any anxiety or fear they experienced from participating in NIPT. These findings have implications for ongoing ethical debates over the role of fetal sex determination in NIPT and suggest that NIPT may also raise more subtle ethical challenges including the reinforcement of sex and gender binaries and the foreclosure of disability as familial possibility, revealing how epistemic shortcuts are at play within NIPT.</description><subject>Cell-free DNA</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Prenatal testing</subject><subject>Providers</subject><subject>Reproductive decision-making</subject><issn>2667-3215</issn><issn>2667-3215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJKrSJ2DjJSyS-m_GHiQWqGpLpApYtGvLsa8Th4wdbHfU7vog8Ai8VJ8ET4Kqrrq61jk-n39O07wneE4w6U4385yHX2lOMWVVwUzwV80R7ToxY5S0r5-t3zYnOW8wxlQQTFt-1Py98MH6sELxtqCyBvT48HsFwUJ6fPiDcowB0id0Xtbe6C0qELKPISMdLNrpBKFUdYjFj7pUA_mArM8mjpAmqIPJz3C3D5h1ikPMcaiaDtO4R8nnn-g2T5tDDD6MOvsR0K6iddmfmMtkfvi2-HH98V3zxulthpP_87i5uTi_Pvs6u_p-uTj7cjUzrONlRnhvnSFuKYHhjttet7rrOqk7QTnjUlOxpMv6d1K0DsBWj1HnjCCCUNy37LhZHLg26o3aJT_odK-i9movxLRSOhVvtqAIp31raSv7XnALRAojnaSECSEpdray2IFlUsw5gXviEaymAtVG7QtUU4HqUGBNfT6koD5z9JBUNh6CAesTmFLv4V_M_wPFz6lX</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Owen, Aleksa</creator><creator>Allen Ratliff, G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-7081</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Finding out the “gender” sooner: Ethical tensions and parental motivation in discovering fetal sex and chromosomal anomaly risk using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)</title><author>Owen, Aleksa ; Allen Ratliff, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-149dfc1fb8e3064d9a5a6668a6724348a27b2b016875feed66632ffc717120953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cell-free DNA</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Prenatal testing</topic><topic>Providers</topic><topic>Reproductive decision-making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owen, Aleksa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen Ratliff, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>SSM. Qualitative research in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owen, Aleksa</au><au>Allen Ratliff, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finding out the “gender” sooner: Ethical tensions and parental motivation in discovering fetal sex and chromosomal anomaly risk using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)</atitle><jtitle>SSM. Qualitative research in health</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>100374</spage><pages>100374-</pages><artnum>100374</artnum><issn>2667-3215</issn><eissn>2667-3215</eissn><abstract>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has rapidly expanded in both utilization and scope since it became available in 2011. While NIPT screens for a limited number of chromosomal anomalies, it has become colloquially known as the “gender” test because of the ability to determine sex chromosome information. Yet users often report being less interested in learning about fetal risk for sex chromosome anomalies (SCAs). To date, most research with NIPT users has focused on those who receive “high risk” or “positive” results. Yet most NIPT users will receive “low risk” results. This is significant because NIPT continues to grow in popularity. To better understand how NIPT “test-negative” users report testing motivations, we analyzed semi-structured interviews with 37 NIPT users using constructivist grounded theory. Participants reported two motivations in using NIPT: 1) learning fetal sex information and 2) gaining “peace of mind” in confirming low risk of chromosomal anomaly, or disability. However, these motivations were also in tension with each other as users described gaining fetal sex information as a valued benefit that offset any anxiety or fear they experienced from participating in NIPT. These findings have implications for ongoing ethical debates over the role of fetal sex determination in NIPT and suggest that NIPT may also raise more subtle ethical challenges including the reinforcement of sex and gender binaries and the foreclosure of disability as familial possibility, revealing how epistemic shortcuts are at play within NIPT.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100374</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-7081</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2667-3215
ispartof SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2024-06, Vol.5, p.100374, Article 100374
issn 2667-3215
2667-3215
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_14295d2589974de187c8f821377820fd
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cell-free DNA
Disability
Prenatal testing
Providers
Reproductive decision-making
title Finding out the “gender” sooner: Ethical tensions and parental motivation in discovering fetal sex and chromosomal anomaly risk using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finding%20out%20the%20%E2%80%9Cgender%E2%80%9D%20sooner:%20Ethical%20tensions%20and%20parental%20motivation%20in%20discovering%20fetal%20sex%20and%20chromosomal%20anomaly%20risk%20using%20noninvasive%20prenatal%20testing%20(NIPT)&rft.jtitle=SSM.%20Qualitative%20research%20in%20health&rft.au=Owen,%20Aleksa&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=100374&rft.pages=100374-&rft.artnum=100374&rft.issn=2667-3215&rft.eissn=2667-3215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100374&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2667321523001580%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-149dfc1fb8e3064d9a5a6668a6724348a27b2b016875feed66632ffc717120953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true