Prospective analysis of in vivo landmark point-based MRI geometric distortion in head and neck cancer patients scanned in immobilized radiation treatment position: Results of a prospective quality assurance protocol

• Published in: Clinical and translational radiation oncology 2017-12, Vol.7, p.13-19
• Main Authors: Mohamed, Abdallah S.R., Hansen, Chase, Weygand, Joseph, Ding, Yao, Frank, Stephen J., Rosenthal, David I., Hwang, Ken-Pin, Hazle, John D., Fuller, Clifton D., Wang, Jihong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Geometric Distortion; Head and Neck Cancer; MRI; Quality Assurance; Radiation Treatment
• ISSN: 2405-6308; 2405-6308
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.003

Uncertainties related to geometric distortion are a major obstacle for effectively utilizing MRI in radiation oncology. We aim to quantify the geometric distortion in patient images by comparing their in-treatment position MRIs with the corresponding planning CTs, using CT as the non-distorted gold standard. Twenty-one head and neck cancer patients were imaged with MRI as part of a prospective Institutional Review Board approved study. MR images were acquired with a T2 SE sequence (0.5×0.5×2.5mm voxel size) in the same immobilization position as in the CTs. MRI to CT rigid registration was then done and geometric distortion comparison was assessed by measuring the corresponding anatomical landmarks on both the MRI and the CT images. Several landmark measurements were obtained including; skin to skin (STS), bone to bone, and soft tissue to soft tissue at specific levels in horizontal and vertical planes of both scans. Inter-observer variability was assessed and interclass correlation (ICC) was calculated. A total of 430 landmark measurements were obtained. The median distortion for all landmarks in all scans was 1.06mm (IQR 0.6–1.98). For each patient 48% of the measurements were done in the right-left direction and 52% were done in the anteroposterior direction. The measured geometric distortion was not statistically different in the right-left direction compared to the anteroposterior direction (1.5±1.6 vs. 1.6±1.7mm, respectively, p=0.4). The magnitude of distortion was higher in the STS peripheral landmarks compared to the more central landmarks (2.0±1.9 vs. 1.2±1.3mm, p