Loading…
Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
IntroductionDepression is a common and disabling health problem that contributes to an important social and economic burden, particularly among the working age population. The deleterious effect of psychosocial work factors on depression has been documented. However, the most recent systematic revie...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ open 2019-11, Vol.9 (11), p.e033093-e033093 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3 |
container_end_page | e033093 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e033093 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Duchaine, Caroline S Aubé, Karine Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula Vezina, Michel Ndjaboue, Ruth Massamba, Victoria K Trudel, Xavier Lesage, Alain Moore, Lynne Laurin, Danielle Brisson, Chantal |
description | IntroductionDepression is a common and disabling health problem that contributes to an important social and economic burden, particularly among the working age population. The deleterious effect of psychosocial work factors on depression has been documented. However, the most recent systematic reviews had restrictive eligibility criteria and, since their publications, several original studies have been published. The proposed systematic review aims to update, evaluate and synthesise the effect of psychosocial work factors from three recognised theoretical models, the demand-control-support, effort-reward imbalance and organisational justice models, on the risk of depression among workers.Method and analysisA systematic literature search will be conducted in seven academic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS) as well as three grey literature databases. The search strategy was first run on January 2017, updated in October 2017 and will be updated 6 months prior to submission for publication. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, study selection will be carried out using a rigorous multistep screening process in duplicate by independent reviewers. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the three theoretical models on depression or antidepressant medication use among working adults will be included. Extracted data will be used for evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided after considering homogeneity and number of studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study will only draw from published studies and grey literature available in electronic databases; ethics approval is not required. The results of this review will be published in a peer review journal and presented at relevant conferences. Given that psychosocial work factors are frequent and modifiable, the results can help reduce the social and economic burden of depression and support public policy-makers to improve occupational health standards.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018107666 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033093 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_152c123b9dc7444fbb472cdd4f9cf4a2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_152c123b9dc7444fbb472cdd4f9cf4a2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2312549133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEolXpEyAhS2zYpPVvErNAQlWBSpXYwNpy7JuOp0kcbGeqeQTeGs9kGFoWCG9s-X7n3GvrFMVrgi8IYdVlO6z9BGNJMZElZgxL9qw4pZjzssJCPH90PinOY1zjvLiQQtCXxQkjlcQVwafFz-uuA5OQ79AUt2blozdO9-jBh3vUaZN8iMiPKK0ABRfvd6CFKUCMzo_vkUZT8Mkb3-8qGsVtTDDo5AwKsHHwgPRo0QBJl3rU_Ta6uO8VfJxyX7cBFNNsHcRXxYtO9xHOD_tZ8f3T9berL-Xt1883Vx9vy1bUTSoNbrVmDCTIzvLGGmaJZNKIGjgI3mBjraw0qa3UwDHJhOTQct5WlOHGsrPiZvG1Xq_VFNygw1Z57dT-woc7pUOevwdFBDWEslZaU3POu7blNc3-vJOm45pmrw-L1zS3A1gDYwq6f2L6tDK6lbrzG1U1oqFUZIN3B4Pgf8wQkxpcNND3egQ_R0UZoYJLwlhG3_6Frv0c8p_uKdIILDHPFFsok384BuiOwxCsdslRh-SoXXLUkpysevP4HUfN75xk4GIBsvo_HS__CI6D_kvxCy6-4b0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311850904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>BMJ journals single titles</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Duchaine, Caroline S ; Aubé, Karine ; Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee ; Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula ; Vezina, Michel ; Ndjaboue, Ruth ; Massamba, Victoria K ; Trudel, Xavier ; Lesage, Alain ; Moore, Lynne ; Laurin, Danielle ; Brisson, Chantal</creator><creatorcontrib>Duchaine, Caroline S ; Aubé, Karine ; Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee ; Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula ; Vezina, Michel ; Ndjaboue, Ruth ; Massamba, Victoria K ; Trudel, Xavier ; Lesage, Alain ; Moore, Lynne ; Laurin, Danielle ; Brisson, Chantal</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionDepression is a common and disabling health problem that contributes to an important social and economic burden, particularly among the working age population. The deleterious effect of psychosocial work factors on depression has been documented. However, the most recent systematic reviews had restrictive eligibility criteria and, since their publications, several original studies have been published. The proposed systematic review aims to update, evaluate and synthesise the effect of psychosocial work factors from three recognised theoretical models, the demand-control-support, effort-reward imbalance and organisational justice models, on the risk of depression among workers.Method and analysisA systematic literature search will be conducted in seven academic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS) as well as three grey literature databases. The search strategy was first run on January 2017, updated in October 2017 and will be updated 6 months prior to submission for publication. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, study selection will be carried out using a rigorous multistep screening process in duplicate by independent reviewers. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the three theoretical models on depression or antidepressant medication use among working adults will be included. Extracted data will be used for evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided after considering homogeneity and number of studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study will only draw from published studies and grey literature available in electronic databases; ethics approval is not required. The results of this review will be published in a peer review journal and presented at relevant conferences. Given that psychosocial work factors are frequent and modifiable, the results can help reduce the social and economic burden of depression and support public policy-makers to improve occupational health standards.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018107666</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31690610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>antidepressant medication ; Bias ; depression ; Evidence-based medicine ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Mental Health ; Meta-analysis ; Occupational stress ; Population ; Psychiatry ; psychosocial work factors ; Quantitative psychology ; Systematic review ; work stress</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2019-11, Vol.9 (11), p.e033093-e033093</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2311850904/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2311850904?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,727,780,784,885,3194,25753,27549,27550,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,55341,55350,75126,77594,77595,77596,77597,77601,77632,77660,77686</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31690610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duchaine, Caroline S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aubé, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezina, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndjaboue, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massamba, Victoria K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudel, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesage, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurin, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisson, Chantal</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>IntroductionDepression is a common and disabling health problem that contributes to an important social and economic burden, particularly among the working age population. The deleterious effect of psychosocial work factors on depression has been documented. However, the most recent systematic reviews had restrictive eligibility criteria and, since their publications, several original studies have been published. The proposed systematic review aims to update, evaluate and synthesise the effect of psychosocial work factors from three recognised theoretical models, the demand-control-support, effort-reward imbalance and organisational justice models, on the risk of depression among workers.Method and analysisA systematic literature search will be conducted in seven academic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS) as well as three grey literature databases. The search strategy was first run on January 2017, updated in October 2017 and will be updated 6 months prior to submission for publication. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, study selection will be carried out using a rigorous multistep screening process in duplicate by independent reviewers. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the three theoretical models on depression or antidepressant medication use among working adults will be included. Extracted data will be used for evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided after considering homogeneity and number of studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study will only draw from published studies and grey literature available in electronic databases; ethics approval is not required. The results of this review will be published in a peer review journal and presented at relevant conferences. Given that psychosocial work factors are frequent and modifiable, the results can help reduce the social and economic burden of depression and support public policy-makers to improve occupational health standards.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018107666</description><subject>antidepressant medication</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>depression</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>psychosocial work factors</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>work stress</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEolXpEyAhS2zYpPVvErNAQlWBSpXYwNpy7JuOp0kcbGeqeQTeGs9kGFoWCG9s-X7n3GvrFMVrgi8IYdVlO6z9BGNJMZElZgxL9qw4pZjzssJCPH90PinOY1zjvLiQQtCXxQkjlcQVwafFz-uuA5OQ79AUt2blozdO9-jBh3vUaZN8iMiPKK0ABRfvd6CFKUCMzo_vkUZT8Mkb3-8qGsVtTDDo5AwKsHHwgPRo0QBJl3rU_Ta6uO8VfJxyX7cBFNNsHcRXxYtO9xHOD_tZ8f3T9berL-Xt1883Vx9vy1bUTSoNbrVmDCTIzvLGGmaJZNKIGjgI3mBjraw0qa3UwDHJhOTQct5WlOHGsrPiZvG1Xq_VFNygw1Z57dT-woc7pUOevwdFBDWEslZaU3POu7blNc3-vJOm45pmrw-L1zS3A1gDYwq6f2L6tDK6lbrzG1U1oqFUZIN3B4Pgf8wQkxpcNND3egQ_R0UZoYJLwlhG3_6Frv0c8p_uKdIILDHPFFsok384BuiOwxCsdslRh-SoXXLUkpysevP4HUfN75xk4GIBsvo_HS__CI6D_kvxCy6-4b0</recordid><startdate>20191104</startdate><enddate>20191104</enddate><creator>Duchaine, Caroline S</creator><creator>Aubé, Karine</creator><creator>Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee</creator><creator>Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula</creator><creator>Vezina, Michel</creator><creator>Ndjaboue, Ruth</creator><creator>Massamba, Victoria K</creator><creator>Trudel, Xavier</creator><creator>Lesage, Alain</creator><creator>Moore, Lynne</creator><creator>Laurin, Danielle</creator><creator>Brisson, Chantal</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191104</creationdate><title>Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies</title><author>Duchaine, Caroline S ; Aubé, Karine ; Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee ; Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula ; Vezina, Michel ; Ndjaboue, Ruth ; Massamba, Victoria K ; Trudel, Xavier ; Lesage, Alain ; Moore, Lynne ; Laurin, Danielle ; Brisson, Chantal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>antidepressant medication</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>depression</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>psychosocial work factors</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>work stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duchaine, Caroline S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aubé, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezina, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndjaboue, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massamba, Victoria K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudel, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesage, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurin, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisson, Chantal</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duchaine, Caroline S</au><au>Aubé, Karine</au><au>Gilbert-Ouimet, Mahee</au><au>Bruno Pena Gralle, Ana Paula</au><au>Vezina, Michel</au><au>Ndjaboue, Ruth</au><au>Massamba, Victoria K</au><au>Trudel, Xavier</au><au>Lesage, Alain</au><au>Moore, Lynne</au><au>Laurin, Danielle</au><au>Brisson, Chantal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><stitle>BMJ Open</stitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2019-11-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e033093</spage><epage>e033093</epage><pages>e033093-e033093</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionDepression is a common and disabling health problem that contributes to an important social and economic burden, particularly among the working age population. The deleterious effect of psychosocial work factors on depression has been documented. However, the most recent systematic reviews had restrictive eligibility criteria and, since their publications, several original studies have been published. The proposed systematic review aims to update, evaluate and synthesise the effect of psychosocial work factors from three recognised theoretical models, the demand-control-support, effort-reward imbalance and organisational justice models, on the risk of depression among workers.Method and analysisA systematic literature search will be conducted in seven academic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS) as well as three grey literature databases. The search strategy was first run on January 2017, updated in October 2017 and will be updated 6 months prior to submission for publication. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, study selection will be carried out using a rigorous multistep screening process in duplicate by independent reviewers. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the three theoretical models on depression or antidepressant medication use among working adults will be included. Extracted data will be used for evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided after considering homogeneity and number of studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study will only draw from published studies and grey literature available in electronic databases; ethics approval is not required. The results of this review will be published in a peer review journal and presented at relevant conferences. Given that psychosocial work factors are frequent and modifiable, the results can help reduce the social and economic burden of depression and support public policy-makers to improve occupational health standards.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018107666</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>31690610</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033093</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2019-11, Vol.9 (11), p.e033093-e033093 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_152c123b9dc7444fbb472cdd4f9cf4a2 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; BMJ journals single titles; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | antidepressant medication Bias depression Evidence-based medicine Mental depression Mental disorders Mental Health Meta-analysis Occupational stress Population Psychiatry psychosocial work factors Quantitative psychology Systematic review work stress |
title | Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A09%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20psychosocial%20work%20factors%20on%20the%20risk%20of%20depression:%20a%20protocol%20of%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20prospective%20studies&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Duchaine,%20Caroline%20S&rft.date=2019-11-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e033093&rft.epage=e033093&rft.pages=e033093-e033093&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2312549133%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-c0baa33e9e9fd48dc3d1939c57e4e5480cdd96a17d9ae4018dc94eb44b62308d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311850904&rft_id=info:pmid/31690610&rfr_iscdi=true |