Measuring Patient-Reported Shared Decision-Making to Promote Performance Transparency and Value-Based Payment: Assessment of collaboRATE’s Group-Level Reliability

• Published in: Journal of patient experience 2020-10, Vol.7 (5), p.742-748
• Main Authors: Forcino, Rachel C, Thygeson, Marcus, O’Malley, A James, Meinders, Marjan J, Westert, Gert P, Elwyn, Glyn
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical decision making; Collaboration; Decision making
• ISSN: 2374-3735; 2374-3743
• DOI: 10.1177/2374373519884835

Shared decision-making (SDM) between clinicians and patients is a key component of patient experience, but measurement efforts have been hampered by a lack of valid and reliable measures that are feasible for routine use. In this study, we aim to investigate collaboRATE’s reliability, calculate required sample sizes for reliable measurement, and compare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) patient experience survey items to collaboRATE. CollaboRATE’s provider group-level reliability reached acceptable reliability at 190 patient reports, while the CAHPS SDM measure demonstrated similar reliability at a sample size of 124. The CAHPS communication measure reached acceptable reliability with 55 patient reports. A strong correlation was observed between collaboRATE and CAHPS communication measures (r = 0.83). As a reliable measure of SDM, collaboRATE may be useful for both building payment models that support shared clinical decision-making and encouraging data transparency with regard to provider group performance.