Diabetes mellitus is not a risk factor for osteoarthritis

• Published in: Rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases open 2020-02, Vol.6 (1), p.e001030
• Main Authors: Khor, Andrew, Ma, Cheryl-Ann, Hong, Cassandra, Hui, Laura Li-Yao, Leung, Ying Ying
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Arthritis; Bias; Biomechanics; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data Management; Diabetes; diabetes mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology; Epidemiology; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperglycemia - complications; Male; Meta-analysis; Metabolism; Obesity; Obesity - complications; Obesity - epidemiology; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis - epidemiology; Osteoarthritis - etiology; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Researchers; Risk Factors; Studies; systematic review
• ISSN: 2056-5933; 2056-5933
• DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001030

BackgroundAssociation between diabetes mellitus (DM) and risk of osteoarthritis (OA) can be confounded by body mass index (BMI), a strong risk factor for both conditions. We evaluate the association between DM or hyperglycaemia with OA using systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Web of Science databases in English for studies that gave information on the association between DM and OA. Two meta-analysis models were conducted to address: (1) risk of DM comparing subjects with and without OA and (2) risk of OA comparing subjects with and without DM. As far as available, risk estimates that adjusted for BMI were used.Results31 studies with a pooled population size of 295 100 subjects were reviewed. 16 and 15 studies reported positive associations and null/ negative associations between DM and OA. 68.8% of positive studies had adjusted for BMI, compared with 93.3% of null/negative studies. In meta-analysis model 1, there was an increase prevalence of DM in subjects with OA compared with those without (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.89). In meta-analysis model 2, there was no increased risk of OA (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.33) in subjects with DM compared with those without, regardless of gender and OA sites. Comparing subjects with DM to those without, an increased risk of OA was noted in cross-sectional studies, but not in case-control and prospective cohort studies.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis does not support DM as an independent risk factor for OA. BMI was probably the most important confounding factor.