Loading…
Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers
Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.175-180 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3 |
container_end_page | 180 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Abudabos, AM Alyemni, AH Zakaria, HAH |
description | Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p>0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/18069061-2015-0052 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scielo_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16779116c1f04d059b16df3681e5f3f7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1516_635X2016000100175</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16779116c1f04d059b16df3681e5f3f7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S1516_635X2016000100175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd1qHDEMhYfSQtO0L9ArP0Am9c_YM75Ml7RdCCRkE8id0dhy4sVrL_akbR6hb92ZbBsCAkuCcyTra5rPjJ4yqekXNlClqWItp0y2lEr-pjlikqlWCXn39lX-vvlQ65ZSoUXXHTV_zr1HO5Hsyc2vTDZTgZDqUl6VPIY8BTtXiUwPSM7SFPLv4CBNZAV7sGF6OiGXS2cKP3ERY60nBJIj693uMSG5xrrPqeKz4wbiLieMEdrVA8SI6R4d-VpyiFjqx-adh1jx07_3uLn9dn6z-tFeXH5fr84uWiu0mlotBB-tHaXsgCmnBOUSu8FaCU4xjZ0WA6dd77RkHNxgkXMEoN4r7kc7iuNmffB1GbZmX8IOypPJEMxzI5d7A2X-dkTDVN9rxpRlnnaOSj3OE71QA0Pphe9nr9ODV7UBYzbb_FjSvLzZLPc2y71nIIpSyubo5SzgB4EtudaC_mUBRs1C0vwnaRaSZiEp_gJJyI-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><creator>Abudabos, AM ; Alyemni, AH ; Zakaria, HAH</creator><creatorcontrib>Abudabos, AM ; Alyemni, AH ; Zakaria, HAH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p>0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively) and by week (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). In conclusion, S. typhimurium challenge had an impact on anti-Salmonella and NC titers. Both probiotics did not affect the broilers' antioxidant capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1516-635X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1516-635X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/18069061-2015-0052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas</publisher><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE ; Immune responses ; ORNITHOLOGY ; Oxidative stress ; Probiotics ; Salmonella enterica ; Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)</subject><ispartof>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.175-180</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abudabos, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alyemni, AH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, HAH</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</title><title>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</title><addtitle>Braz. J. Poult. Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p>0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively) and by week (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). In conclusion, S. typhimurium challenge had an impact on anti-Salmonella and NC titers. Both probiotics did not affect the broilers' antioxidant capacity.</description><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>Immune responses</subject><subject>ORNITHOLOGY</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica</subject><subject>Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)</subject><issn>1516-635X</issn><issn>1806-9061</issn><issn>1516-635X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkd1qHDEMhYfSQtO0L9ArP0Am9c_YM75Ml7RdCCRkE8id0dhy4sVrL_akbR6hb92ZbBsCAkuCcyTra5rPjJ4yqekXNlClqWItp0y2lEr-pjlikqlWCXn39lX-vvlQ65ZSoUXXHTV_zr1HO5Hsyc2vTDZTgZDqUl6VPIY8BTtXiUwPSM7SFPLv4CBNZAV7sGF6OiGXS2cKP3ERY60nBJIj693uMSG5xrrPqeKz4wbiLieMEdrVA8SI6R4d-VpyiFjqx-adh1jx07_3uLn9dn6z-tFeXH5fr84uWiu0mlotBB-tHaXsgCmnBOUSu8FaCU4xjZ0WA6dd77RkHNxgkXMEoN4r7kc7iuNmffB1GbZmX8IOypPJEMxzI5d7A2X-dkTDVN9rxpRlnnaOSj3OE71QA0Pphe9nr9ODV7UBYzbb_FjSvLzZLPc2y71nIIpSyubo5SzgB4EtudaC_mUBRs1C0vwnaRaSZiEp_gJJyI-0</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Abudabos, AM</creator><creator>Alyemni, AH</creator><creator>Zakaria, HAH</creator><general>Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</title><author>Abudabos, AM ; Alyemni, AH ; Zakaria, HAH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>Immune responses</topic><topic>ORNITHOLOGY</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica</topic><topic>Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abudabos, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alyemni, AH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, HAH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abudabos, AM</au><au>Alyemni, AH</au><au>Zakaria, HAH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</jtitle><addtitle>Braz. J. Poult. Sci</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>175-180</pages><issn>1516-635X</issn><issn>1806-9061</issn><eissn>1516-635X</eissn><abstract>Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p>0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively) and by week (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). In conclusion, S. typhimurium challenge had an impact on anti-Salmonella and NC titers. Both probiotics did not affect the broilers' antioxidant capacity.</abstract><pub>Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas</pub><doi>10.1590/18069061-2015-0052</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1516-635X |
ispartof | Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.175-180 |
issn | 1516-635X 1806-9061 1516-635X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16779116c1f04d059b16df3681e5f3f7 |
source | SciELO Brazil |
subjects | AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Immune responses ORNITHOLOGY Oxidative stress Probiotics Salmonella enterica Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) |
title | Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Two%20Strains%20of%20Probiotics%20on%20the%20Antioxidant%20Capacity,%20Oxidative%20Stress,%20and%20Immune%20Responses%20of%20Salmonella-Challenged%20Broilers&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20Journal%20of%20Poultry%20Science&rft.au=Abudabos,%20AM&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=175-180&rft.issn=1516-635X&rft.eissn=1516-635X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/18069061-2015-0052&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_doaj_%3ES1516_635X2016000100175%3C/scielo_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1516_635X2016000100175&rfr_iscdi=true |