Loading…

Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers

Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.175-180
Main Authors: Abudabos, AM, Alyemni, AH, Zakaria, HAH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3
container_end_page 180
container_issue 1
container_start_page 175
container_title Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science
container_volume 18
creator Abudabos, AM
Alyemni, AH
Zakaria, HAH
description Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p>0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p
doi_str_mv 10.1590/18069061-2015-0052
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16779116c1f04d059b16df3681e5f3f7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1516_635X2016000100175</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16779116c1f04d059b16df3681e5f3f7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S1516_635X2016000100175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd1qHDEMhYfSQtO0L9ArP0Am9c_YM75Ml7RdCCRkE8id0dhy4sVrL_akbR6hb92ZbBsCAkuCcyTra5rPjJ4yqekXNlClqWItp0y2lEr-pjlikqlWCXn39lX-vvlQ65ZSoUXXHTV_zr1HO5Hsyc2vTDZTgZDqUl6VPIY8BTtXiUwPSM7SFPLv4CBNZAV7sGF6OiGXS2cKP3ERY60nBJIj693uMSG5xrrPqeKz4wbiLieMEdrVA8SI6R4d-VpyiFjqx-adh1jx07_3uLn9dn6z-tFeXH5fr84uWiu0mlotBB-tHaXsgCmnBOUSu8FaCU4xjZ0WA6dd77RkHNxgkXMEoN4r7kc7iuNmffB1GbZmX8IOypPJEMxzI5d7A2X-dkTDVN9rxpRlnnaOSj3OE71QA0Pphe9nr9ODV7UBYzbb_FjSvLzZLPc2y71nIIpSyubo5SzgB4EtudaC_mUBRs1C0vwnaRaSZiEp_gJJyI-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><creator>Abudabos, AM ; Alyemni, AH ; Zakaria, HAH</creator><creatorcontrib>Abudabos, AM ; Alyemni, AH ; Zakaria, HAH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p&gt;0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p&lt;0.01, p&lt;0.05, respectively) and by week (p&lt;0.001, p&lt;0.001, respectively). In conclusion, S. typhimurium challenge had an impact on anti-Salmonella and NC titers. Both probiotics did not affect the broilers' antioxidant capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1516-635X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1516-635X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/18069061-2015-0052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas</publisher><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY &amp; ANIMAL SCIENCE ; Immune responses ; ORNITHOLOGY ; Oxidative stress ; Probiotics ; Salmonella enterica ; Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)</subject><ispartof>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.175-180</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abudabos, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alyemni, AH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, HAH</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</title><title>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</title><addtitle>Braz. J. Poult. Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p&gt;0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p&lt;0.01, p&lt;0.05, respectively) and by week (p&lt;0.001, p&lt;0.001, respectively). In conclusion, S. typhimurium challenge had an impact on anti-Salmonella and NC titers. Both probiotics did not affect the broilers' antioxidant capacity.</description><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY &amp; ANIMAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>Immune responses</subject><subject>ORNITHOLOGY</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica</subject><subject>Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)</subject><issn>1516-635X</issn><issn>1806-9061</issn><issn>1516-635X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkd1qHDEMhYfSQtO0L9ArP0Am9c_YM75Ml7RdCCRkE8id0dhy4sVrL_akbR6hb92ZbBsCAkuCcyTra5rPjJ4yqekXNlClqWItp0y2lEr-pjlikqlWCXn39lX-vvlQ65ZSoUXXHTV_zr1HO5Hsyc2vTDZTgZDqUl6VPIY8BTtXiUwPSM7SFPLv4CBNZAV7sGF6OiGXS2cKP3ERY60nBJIj693uMSG5xrrPqeKz4wbiLieMEdrVA8SI6R4d-VpyiFjqx-adh1jx07_3uLn9dn6z-tFeXH5fr84uWiu0mlotBB-tHaXsgCmnBOUSu8FaCU4xjZ0WA6dd77RkHNxgkXMEoN4r7kc7iuNmffB1GbZmX8IOypPJEMxzI5d7A2X-dkTDVN9rxpRlnnaOSj3OE71QA0Pphe9nr9ODV7UBYzbb_FjSvLzZLPc2y71nIIpSyubo5SzgB4EtudaC_mUBRs1C0vwnaRaSZiEp_gJJyI-0</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Abudabos, AM</creator><creator>Alyemni, AH</creator><creator>Zakaria, HAH</creator><general>Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</title><author>Abudabos, AM ; Alyemni, AH ; Zakaria, HAH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY &amp; ANIMAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>Immune responses</topic><topic>ORNITHOLOGY</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica</topic><topic>Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abudabos, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alyemni, AH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, HAH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abudabos, AM</au><au>Alyemni, AH</au><au>Zakaria, HAH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</jtitle><addtitle>Braz. J. Poult. Sci</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>175-180</pages><issn>1516-635X</issn><issn>1806-9061</issn><eissn>1516-635X</eissn><abstract>Abstract The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of two strains of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Bacillus Cereus var. toyoi) on selected indicators of the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica subsp. Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). Birds were distributed into the following five treatments: negative control (CTL−); negative control+S. typhimurium (CTL+); antibiotic+S. typhimurium, (AB); Toyocerin(r)+S. typhimurium (TOYO); and CloSTATTM+ S. typhimurium (CLOS). Birds in all treatments, except for CTL−, were orally challenged with 3 x109 CFUS. typhimurium at 16 days of age. The results showed that total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) values were similar among all groups. The antibody titers against S. typhimurium and Newcastle disease (ND) were not affected by the treatments (p&gt;0.05). However, S. typhimurium and ND titers were influenced by the interaction between week and treatment (p&lt;0.01, p&lt;0.05, respectively) and by week (p&lt;0.001, p&lt;0.001, respectively). In conclusion, S. typhimurium challenge had an impact on anti-Salmonella and NC titers. Both probiotics did not affect the broilers' antioxidant capacity.</abstract><pub>Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas</pub><doi>10.1590/18069061-2015-0052</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1516-635X
ispartof Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.175-180
issn 1516-635X
1806-9061
1516-635X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16779116c1f04d059b16df3681e5f3f7
source SciELO Brazil
subjects AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Immune responses
ORNITHOLOGY
Oxidative stress
Probiotics
Salmonella enterica
Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)
title Effect of Two Strains of Probiotics on the Antioxidant Capacity, Oxidative Stress, and Immune Responses of Salmonella-Challenged Broilers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Two%20Strains%20of%20Probiotics%20on%20the%20Antioxidant%20Capacity,%20Oxidative%20Stress,%20and%20Immune%20Responses%20of%20Salmonella-Challenged%20Broilers&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20Journal%20of%20Poultry%20Science&rft.au=Abudabos,%20AM&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=175-180&rft.issn=1516-635X&rft.eissn=1516-635X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/18069061-2015-0052&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_doaj_%3ES1516_635X2016000100175%3C/scielo_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9332bccb554a16d63025e48cc5ad619e49382047d9512ad8ce22eaa0ff62fbcb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1516_635X2016000100175&rfr_iscdi=true