Loading…

Visual Thinking Strategies in medical education: a systematic review

Arts-based pedagogical tools have been increasingly incorporated into medical education. Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a research-based, constructivist teaching methodology that aims to improve visual literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills through the process of investigating wo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC medical education 2023-07, Vol.23 (1), p.536-536, Article 536
Main Authors: Cerqueira, Ana Rita, Alves, Ana Sofia, Monteiro-Soares, Matilde, Hailey, Dabney, Loureiro, Domingos, Baptista, Sofia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3
container_end_page 536
container_issue 1
container_start_page 536
container_title BMC medical education
container_volume 23
creator Cerqueira, Ana Rita
Alves, Ana Sofia
Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
Hailey, Dabney
Loureiro, Domingos
Baptista, Sofia
description Arts-based pedagogical tools have been increasingly incorporated into medical education. Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a research-based, constructivist teaching methodology that aims to improve visual literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills through the process of investigating works of art. Harvard Medical School pioneered the application of VTS within medical education in 2004. While there are several studies investigating the use of VTS, there is a need to systematically assess the different programs that exist for medical education and their efficacy in improving relevant clinical skills. This systematic review aims to critically analyse the available evidence of the effectiveness of VTS in medical education to guide future research and provide a framework to adapt medical curricula. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases (through November 2022) was conducted to identify studies of VTS-based interventions in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Two reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The extracted data was then narratively synthesized. Of 5759 unique citations, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. After reference review, one additional study was included. Therefore, 11 studies were included in our review. Of these, eight reported VTS-based interventions for undergraduate medical students and three reported interventions in residency training, specifically in dermatology and ophthalmology. The main goal of most studies was to increase observational or visual diagnostic skills. Three of the studies in undergraduate medical education and two in postgraduate achieved a statistically significant improvement in observational skills in post-course evaluations. Some studies reported increased tolerance for ambiguity and empathy. Although the studies varied considerably in study design, learning objectives, and outcomes, findings consistently indicate that the VTS approach can serve as a vehicle to develop crucial clinical competencies, encouraging more in-depth visual analysis that could be applied when observing a patient. Despite some limitations of the included studies (lack of control groups, self-selection bias, or non-standard outcome measures), the results of this review provide support for greater inclusion of VTS training in the medical curriculum.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12909-023-04470-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16aa673326c740c19adf1a2de3dea9c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A758709348</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16aa673326c740c19adf1a2de3dea9c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A758709348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstuFDEQHCEQCYEf4IBG4pLLBL895oKi8IoUiQOBq9VreyZeZu1gzwTl7-lkQ8gi5IMfXVV2tatpXlJyRGmv3lTKDDEdYbwjQmjS8UfNPhWadcow8vjBeq95VuuaEKp7Tp82e1xLQrG637z_HusCU3t-EdOPmMb261xgDmMMtY2p3QQfHZaDXxzMMae3LbT1us5hg1vXlnAVw6_nzZMBphpe3M0HzbePH85PPndnXz6dnhyfdU4qMXee65VQPfGGU8-YcSs2AFErMIQqKo1kznNDeBBgqPeKOu_AMaOUl6HvHT9oTre6PsPaXpa4gXJtM0R7e5DLaKHgs6ZgqQJQmnOmnBbEUQN-oMB84D6AcRK13m21LpcVunQhofFpR3S3kuKFHfOVpQS7pxVFhcM7hZJ_LqHOdhOrC9MEKeSlWtYLQQzFL0Lo63-g67yUhL1ClGSESSbJX9QI6CCmIePF7kbUHmvZaxQSPaKO_oPC4cMmupzCEPF8h8C2BFdyrSUM9yYpsTdBstsgWQySvQ2S5Uh69bA995Q_yeG_AeMOwb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852025250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual Thinking Strategies in medical education: a systematic review</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Cerqueira, Ana Rita ; Alves, Ana Sofia ; Monteiro-Soares, Matilde ; Hailey, Dabney ; Loureiro, Domingos ; Baptista, Sofia</creator><creatorcontrib>Cerqueira, Ana Rita ; Alves, Ana Sofia ; Monteiro-Soares, Matilde ; Hailey, Dabney ; Loureiro, Domingos ; Baptista, Sofia</creatorcontrib><description>Arts-based pedagogical tools have been increasingly incorporated into medical education. Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a research-based, constructivist teaching methodology that aims to improve visual literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills through the process of investigating works of art. Harvard Medical School pioneered the application of VTS within medical education in 2004. While there are several studies investigating the use of VTS, there is a need to systematically assess the different programs that exist for medical education and their efficacy in improving relevant clinical skills. This systematic review aims to critically analyse the available evidence of the effectiveness of VTS in medical education to guide future research and provide a framework to adapt medical curricula. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases (through November 2022) was conducted to identify studies of VTS-based interventions in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Two reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The extracted data was then narratively synthesized. Of 5759 unique citations, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. After reference review, one additional study was included. Therefore, 11 studies were included in our review. Of these, eight reported VTS-based interventions for undergraduate medical students and three reported interventions in residency training, specifically in dermatology and ophthalmology. The main goal of most studies was to increase observational or visual diagnostic skills. Three of the studies in undergraduate medical education and two in postgraduate achieved a statistically significant improvement in observational skills in post-course evaluations. Some studies reported increased tolerance for ambiguity and empathy. Although the studies varied considerably in study design, learning objectives, and outcomes, findings consistently indicate that the VTS approach can serve as a vehicle to develop crucial clinical competencies, encouraging more in-depth visual analysis that could be applied when observing a patient. Despite some limitations of the included studies (lack of control groups, self-selection bias, or non-standard outcome measures), the results of this review provide support for greater inclusion of VTS training in the medical curriculum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04470-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37501147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Art galleries &amp; museums ; Citations ; Content analysis ; Control Groups ; Critical thinking ; Curricula ; Data Analysis ; Empathy ; Learning ; Literacy programs ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Methods ; Postgraduate medical education ; Qualitative research ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Systematic review ; Teaching methods ; Training ; Undergraduate medical education ; Visual perception ; Visual thinking strategies</subject><ispartof>BMC medical education, 2023-07, Vol.23 (1), p.536-536, Article 536</ispartof><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375761/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2852025250?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,37012,37013,43733,43880,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cerqueira, Ana Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Ana Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro-Soares, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hailey, Dabney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loureiro, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baptista, Sofia</creatorcontrib><title>Visual Thinking Strategies in medical education: a systematic review</title><title>BMC medical education</title><addtitle>BMC Med Educ</addtitle><description>Arts-based pedagogical tools have been increasingly incorporated into medical education. Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a research-based, constructivist teaching methodology that aims to improve visual literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills through the process of investigating works of art. Harvard Medical School pioneered the application of VTS within medical education in 2004. While there are several studies investigating the use of VTS, there is a need to systematically assess the different programs that exist for medical education and their efficacy in improving relevant clinical skills. This systematic review aims to critically analyse the available evidence of the effectiveness of VTS in medical education to guide future research and provide a framework to adapt medical curricula. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases (through November 2022) was conducted to identify studies of VTS-based interventions in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Two reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The extracted data was then narratively synthesized. Of 5759 unique citations, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. After reference review, one additional study was included. Therefore, 11 studies were included in our review. Of these, eight reported VTS-based interventions for undergraduate medical students and three reported interventions in residency training, specifically in dermatology and ophthalmology. The main goal of most studies was to increase observational or visual diagnostic skills. Three of the studies in undergraduate medical education and two in postgraduate achieved a statistically significant improvement in observational skills in post-course evaluations. Some studies reported increased tolerance for ambiguity and empathy. Although the studies varied considerably in study design, learning objectives, and outcomes, findings consistently indicate that the VTS approach can serve as a vehicle to develop crucial clinical competencies, encouraging more in-depth visual analysis that could be applied when observing a patient. Despite some limitations of the included studies (lack of control groups, self-selection bias, or non-standard outcome measures), the results of this review provide support for greater inclusion of VTS training in the medical curriculum.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Art galleries &amp; museums</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy programs</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Postgraduate medical education</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate medical education</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual thinking strategies</subject><issn>1472-6920</issn><issn>1472-6920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstuFDEQHCEQCYEf4IBG4pLLBL895oKi8IoUiQOBq9VreyZeZu1gzwTl7-lkQ8gi5IMfXVV2tatpXlJyRGmv3lTKDDEdYbwjQmjS8UfNPhWadcow8vjBeq95VuuaEKp7Tp82e1xLQrG637z_HusCU3t-EdOPmMb261xgDmMMtY2p3QQfHZaDXxzMMae3LbT1us5hg1vXlnAVw6_nzZMBphpe3M0HzbePH85PPndnXz6dnhyfdU4qMXee65VQPfGGU8-YcSs2AFErMIQqKo1kznNDeBBgqPeKOu_AMaOUl6HvHT9oTre6PsPaXpa4gXJtM0R7e5DLaKHgs6ZgqQJQmnOmnBbEUQN-oMB84D6AcRK13m21LpcVunQhofFpR3S3kuKFHfOVpQS7pxVFhcM7hZJ_LqHOdhOrC9MEKeSlWtYLQQzFL0Lo63-g67yUhL1ClGSESSbJX9QI6CCmIePF7kbUHmvZaxQSPaKO_oPC4cMmupzCEPF8h8C2BFdyrSUM9yYpsTdBstsgWQySvQ2S5Uh69bA995Q_yeG_AeMOwb4</recordid><startdate>20230727</startdate><enddate>20230727</enddate><creator>Cerqueira, Ana Rita</creator><creator>Alves, Ana Sofia</creator><creator>Monteiro-Soares, Matilde</creator><creator>Hailey, Dabney</creator><creator>Loureiro, Domingos</creator><creator>Baptista, Sofia</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230727</creationdate><title>Visual Thinking Strategies in medical education: a systematic review</title><author>Cerqueira, Ana Rita ; Alves, Ana Sofia ; Monteiro-Soares, Matilde ; Hailey, Dabney ; Loureiro, Domingos ; Baptista, Sofia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Art galleries &amp; museums</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy programs</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Postgraduate medical education</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate medical education</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual thinking strategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cerqueira, Ana Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Ana Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro-Soares, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hailey, Dabney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loureiro, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baptista, Sofia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cerqueira, Ana Rita</au><au>Alves, Ana Sofia</au><au>Monteiro-Soares, Matilde</au><au>Hailey, Dabney</au><au>Loureiro, Domingos</au><au>Baptista, Sofia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual Thinking Strategies in medical education: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical education</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Educ</addtitle><date>2023-07-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>536-536</pages><artnum>536</artnum><issn>1472-6920</issn><eissn>1472-6920</eissn><abstract>Arts-based pedagogical tools have been increasingly incorporated into medical education. Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a research-based, constructivist teaching methodology that aims to improve visual literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills through the process of investigating works of art. Harvard Medical School pioneered the application of VTS within medical education in 2004. While there are several studies investigating the use of VTS, there is a need to systematically assess the different programs that exist for medical education and their efficacy in improving relevant clinical skills. This systematic review aims to critically analyse the available evidence of the effectiveness of VTS in medical education to guide future research and provide a framework to adapt medical curricula. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases (through November 2022) was conducted to identify studies of VTS-based interventions in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Two reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The extracted data was then narratively synthesized. Of 5759 unique citations, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. After reference review, one additional study was included. Therefore, 11 studies were included in our review. Of these, eight reported VTS-based interventions for undergraduate medical students and three reported interventions in residency training, specifically in dermatology and ophthalmology. The main goal of most studies was to increase observational or visual diagnostic skills. Three of the studies in undergraduate medical education and two in postgraduate achieved a statistically significant improvement in observational skills in post-course evaluations. Some studies reported increased tolerance for ambiguity and empathy. Although the studies varied considerably in study design, learning objectives, and outcomes, findings consistently indicate that the VTS approach can serve as a vehicle to develop crucial clinical competencies, encouraging more in-depth visual analysis that could be applied when observing a patient. Despite some limitations of the included studies (lack of control groups, self-selection bias, or non-standard outcome measures), the results of this review provide support for greater inclusion of VTS training in the medical curriculum.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>37501147</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12909-023-04470-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6920
ispartof BMC medical education, 2023-07, Vol.23 (1), p.536-536, Article 536
issn 1472-6920
1472-6920
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16aa673326c740c19adf1a2de3dea9c5
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Social Science Premium Collection; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Education Collection
subjects Analysis
Art galleries & museums
Citations
Content analysis
Control Groups
Critical thinking
Curricula
Data Analysis
Empathy
Learning
Literacy programs
Medical education
Medical students
Methods
Postgraduate medical education
Qualitative research
Quasi-experimental methods
Systematic review
Teaching methods
Training
Undergraduate medical education
Visual perception
Visual thinking strategies
title Visual Thinking Strategies in medical education: a systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A18%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20Thinking%20Strategies%20in%20medical%20education:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20education&rft.au=Cerqueira,%20Ana%20Rita&rft.date=2023-07-27&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=536-536&rft.artnum=536&rft.issn=1472-6920&rft.eissn=1472-6920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12909-023-04470-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA758709348%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d37b4680d931d229cb2fa06ba901615952cd3903e4a91dd61cdcac2966d5e88c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852025250&rft_id=info:pmid/37501147&rft_galeid=A758709348&rfr_iscdi=true