Loading…

Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking

Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of eye movement research 2023-03, Vol.16 (1)
Main Authors: Krauze, Linda, Delesa-Velina, Mara, Pladere, Tatjana, Krumina, Gunta
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of eye movement research
container_volume 16
creator Krauze, Linda
Delesa-Velina, Mara
Pladere, Tatjana
Krumina, Gunta
description Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.
doi_str_mv 10.16910/jemr.16.1.4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-f90a220cf9289906f5c19ff4bf0f6020c03c3f70193b8ace780fdd4a37ae7eeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWGrvfIA8gFtz2M0m3knroVDQC8XLMJudtFv3IMm2sG_v2oo4N_PxD3wMPyHXnM25Mpzd7rAJI875PD0jE25MlmhlxPk_viSzGHdsHCXyVKgJef3YDlQsaQ1Dt-9p1VK5pFUDG4y0gb7HEO8oHqoSW4fUh66hhyruoaYRIbgthbakOGDSB3CfVbu5Ihce6oiz3z0l748Pb4vnZP3ytFrcrxMnhOoTbxgIwZw3QhvDlM8cN96nhWdesfHApJM-Z9zIQoPDXDNflinIHDBHLOSUrE7esoOd_Qrjz2GwHVT2GHRhYyH0lavRclWUmfCswMynzGidZoWSSudGMilyPbpuTi4XuhgD-j8fZ_ZYrv0pd0TLbSq_ASX9bCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Krauze, Linda ; Delesa-Velina, Mara ; Pladere, Tatjana ; Krumina, Gunta</creator><creatorcontrib>Krauze, Linda ; Delesa-Velina, Mara ; Pladere, Tatjana ; Krumina, Gunta</creatorcontrib><description>Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1995-8692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1995-8692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.16910/jemr.16.1.4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bern Open Publishing</publisher><subject>2D layout ; 3D image ; area of interest ; binocular disparity ; depth perception ; item distance</subject><ispartof>Journal of eye movement research, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krauze, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delesa-Velina, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pladere, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krumina, Gunta</creatorcontrib><title>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</title><title>Journal of eye movement research</title><description>Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.</description><subject>2D layout</subject><subject>3D image</subject><subject>area of interest</subject><subject>binocular disparity</subject><subject>depth perception</subject><subject>item distance</subject><issn>1995-8692</issn><issn>1995-8692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWGrvfIA8gFtz2M0m3knroVDQC8XLMJudtFv3IMm2sG_v2oo4N_PxD3wMPyHXnM25Mpzd7rAJI875PD0jE25MlmhlxPk_viSzGHdsHCXyVKgJef3YDlQsaQ1Dt-9p1VK5pFUDG4y0gb7HEO8oHqoSW4fUh66hhyruoaYRIbgthbakOGDSB3CfVbu5Ihce6oiz3z0l748Pb4vnZP3ytFrcrxMnhOoTbxgIwZw3QhvDlM8cN96nhWdesfHApJM-Z9zIQoPDXDNflinIHDBHLOSUrE7esoOd_Qrjz2GwHVT2GHRhYyH0lavRclWUmfCswMynzGidZoWSSudGMilyPbpuTi4XuhgD-j8fZ_ZYrv0pd0TLbSq_ASX9bCM</recordid><startdate>20230331</startdate><enddate>20230331</enddate><creator>Krauze, Linda</creator><creator>Delesa-Velina, Mara</creator><creator>Pladere, Tatjana</creator><creator>Krumina, Gunta</creator><general>Bern Open Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230331</creationdate><title>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</title><author>Krauze, Linda ; Delesa-Velina, Mara ; Pladere, Tatjana ; Krumina, Gunta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-f90a220cf9289906f5c19ff4bf0f6020c03c3f70193b8ace780fdd4a37ae7eeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>2D layout</topic><topic>3D image</topic><topic>area of interest</topic><topic>binocular disparity</topic><topic>depth perception</topic><topic>item distance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krauze, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delesa-Velina, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pladere, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krumina, Gunta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of eye movement research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krauze, Linda</au><au>Delesa-Velina, Mara</au><au>Pladere, Tatjana</au><au>Krumina, Gunta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of eye movement research</jtitle><date>2023-03-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1995-8692</issn><eissn>1995-8692</eissn><abstract>Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.</abstract><pub>Bern Open Publishing</pub><doi>10.16910/jemr.16.1.4</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1995-8692
ispartof Journal of eye movement research, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1)
issn 1995-8692
1995-8692
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278
source PubMed Central
subjects 2D layout
3D image
area of interest
binocular disparity
depth perception
item distance
title Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%202D%20layout%20in%203D%20images%20matters:%20evidence%20from%20visual%20search%20and%20eye-tracking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20eye%20movement%20research&rft.au=Krauze,%20Linda&rft.date=2023-03-31&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1995-8692&rft.eissn=1995-8692&rft_id=info:doi/10.16910/jemr.16.1.4&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-f90a220cf9289906f5c19ff4bf0f6020c03c3f70193b8ace780fdd4a37ae7eeb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true