Loading…
Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking
Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of eye movement research 2023-03, Vol.16 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of eye movement research |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Krauze, Linda Delesa-Velina, Mara Pladere, Tatjana Krumina, Gunta |
description | Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays. |
doi_str_mv | 10.16910/jemr.16.1.4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-f90a220cf9289906f5c19ff4bf0f6020c03c3f70193b8ace780fdd4a37ae7eeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWGrvfIA8gFtz2M0m3knroVDQC8XLMJudtFv3IMm2sG_v2oo4N_PxD3wMPyHXnM25Mpzd7rAJI875PD0jE25MlmhlxPk_viSzGHdsHCXyVKgJef3YDlQsaQ1Dt-9p1VK5pFUDG4y0gb7HEO8oHqoSW4fUh66hhyruoaYRIbgthbakOGDSB3CfVbu5Ihce6oiz3z0l748Pb4vnZP3ytFrcrxMnhOoTbxgIwZw3QhvDlM8cN96nhWdesfHApJM-Z9zIQoPDXDNflinIHDBHLOSUrE7esoOd_Qrjz2GwHVT2GHRhYyH0lavRclWUmfCswMynzGidZoWSSudGMilyPbpuTi4XuhgD-j8fZ_ZYrv0pd0TLbSq_ASX9bCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Krauze, Linda ; Delesa-Velina, Mara ; Pladere, Tatjana ; Krumina, Gunta</creator><creatorcontrib>Krauze, Linda ; Delesa-Velina, Mara ; Pladere, Tatjana ; Krumina, Gunta</creatorcontrib><description>Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1995-8692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1995-8692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.16910/jemr.16.1.4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bern Open Publishing</publisher><subject>2D layout ; 3D image ; area of interest ; binocular disparity ; depth perception ; item distance</subject><ispartof>Journal of eye movement research, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krauze, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delesa-Velina, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pladere, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krumina, Gunta</creatorcontrib><title>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</title><title>Journal of eye movement research</title><description>Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.</description><subject>2D layout</subject><subject>3D image</subject><subject>area of interest</subject><subject>binocular disparity</subject><subject>depth perception</subject><subject>item distance</subject><issn>1995-8692</issn><issn>1995-8692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWGrvfIA8gFtz2M0m3knroVDQC8XLMJudtFv3IMm2sG_v2oo4N_PxD3wMPyHXnM25Mpzd7rAJI875PD0jE25MlmhlxPk_viSzGHdsHCXyVKgJef3YDlQsaQ1Dt-9p1VK5pFUDG4y0gb7HEO8oHqoSW4fUh66hhyruoaYRIbgthbakOGDSB3CfVbu5Ihce6oiz3z0l748Pb4vnZP3ytFrcrxMnhOoTbxgIwZw3QhvDlM8cN96nhWdesfHApJM-Z9zIQoPDXDNflinIHDBHLOSUrE7esoOd_Qrjz2GwHVT2GHRhYyH0lavRclWUmfCswMynzGidZoWSSudGMilyPbpuTi4XuhgD-j8fZ_ZYrv0pd0TLbSq_ASX9bCM</recordid><startdate>20230331</startdate><enddate>20230331</enddate><creator>Krauze, Linda</creator><creator>Delesa-Velina, Mara</creator><creator>Pladere, Tatjana</creator><creator>Krumina, Gunta</creator><general>Bern Open Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230331</creationdate><title>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</title><author>Krauze, Linda ; Delesa-Velina, Mara ; Pladere, Tatjana ; Krumina, Gunta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-f90a220cf9289906f5c19ff4bf0f6020c03c3f70193b8ace780fdd4a37ae7eeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>2D layout</topic><topic>3D image</topic><topic>area of interest</topic><topic>binocular disparity</topic><topic>depth perception</topic><topic>item distance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krauze, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delesa-Velina, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pladere, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krumina, Gunta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of eye movement research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krauze, Linda</au><au>Delesa-Velina, Mara</au><au>Pladere, Tatjana</au><au>Krumina, Gunta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of eye movement research</jtitle><date>2023-03-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1995-8692</issn><eissn>1995-8692</eissn><abstract>Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.</abstract><pub>Bern Open Publishing</pub><doi>10.16910/jemr.16.1.4</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1995-8692 |
ispartof | Journal of eye movement research, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1) |
issn | 1995-8692 1995-8692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | 2D layout 3D image area of interest binocular disparity depth perception item distance |
title | Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eye-tracking |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%202D%20layout%20in%203D%20images%20matters:%20evidence%20from%20visual%20search%20and%20eye-tracking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20eye%20movement%20research&rft.au=Krauze,%20Linda&rft.date=2023-03-31&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1995-8692&rft.eissn=1995-8692&rft_id=info:doi/10.16910/jemr.16.1.4&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_16bd52f0be5f4098845b636879303278%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-f90a220cf9289906f5c19ff4bf0f6020c03c3f70193b8ace780fdd4a37ae7eeb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |