A GIS-based integrative approach for land use optimization in a semi-arid watershed

• Published in: Global journal of environmental science and management 2018-12, Vol.4 (1), p.31-46
• Main Authors: Tajbakhsh, S M, Memarian, H, Kheyrkhah, A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural economics; Analytic hierarchy process; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Aridity; Farming; Goal programming; Harvesting; Income; Income maximization; Irrigated farming; Land use; Land use management; Land use optimization; Multi-objective land allocation (MOLA); Multiple objective analysis; Natural resource management; Natural resources; Net income; Optimization; Rainfed farming; Rangelands; Resource management; Runoff; Runoff volume; Sediment load; Sediment yield; Sediments; Surface runoff; Watersheds; Weighted goal programming (WGP)
• ISSN: 2383-3572; 2383-3866
• DOI: 10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.01.004

The proper use of natural resources can preserve these valuable assets. In line with the management of natural resources, land use optimization can be highly useful. The aim of the present study is to propose an appropriate integrative model for optimized allocation of lands for surface runoff and sediment load minimization and net income maximization in Bayg watershed, Iran. In this study, five categories of land uses, i.e. irrigated orchard, rangeland, irrigated farming, rainfed farming and almond orchard were spatially optimized to minimize surface runoff and sediment yield and to increase net income by integrating three approaches: weighted goal programming, analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective land allocation algorithm. To achieve the target levels in this work, the acreages of almond orchard and rainfed farming should be reduced by 100% and 37.32% respectively, and irrigated farming acreage should be increased by 138.53%. Through these alterations in the land use acreage, the sediment load will be reduced by 16.78% and net income will be improved by 72.52%. However, runoff volume will be increased by 0.22%. Results indicated that weighted goal programming satisfied 96% and 46% of the target levels of sediment load and net income respectively, but failed to reduce runoffvolume. Therefore, it is necessary for managers to control runoffusing the strategies related to runoff harvesting, especially on steep slopes. Generally, it can be concluded that a combination of the techniques weighted goal programming, analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective land allocation is highly capable to optimize land use and land covers based on the conflicting objectives.