Loading…
Assessing racial bias in type 2 diabetes risk prediction algorithms
Risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes can be useful for the early detection of individuals at high risk. However, models may also bias clinical decision-making processes, for instance by differential risk miscalibration across racial groups. We investigated whether the Prediabetes Risk Test (PR...
Saved in:
Published in: | PLOS global public health 2023, Vol.3 (5), p.e0001556-e0001556 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3 |
container_end_page | e0001556 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0001556 |
container_title | PLOS global public health |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Cronjé, Héléne T Katsiferis, Alexandros Elsenburg, Leonie K Andersen, Thea O Rod, Naja H Nguyen, Tri-Long Varga, Tibor V |
description | Risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes can be useful for the early detection of individuals at high risk. However, models may also bias clinical decision-making processes, for instance by differential risk miscalibration across racial groups. We investigated whether the Prediabetes Risk Test (PRT) issued by the National Diabetes Prevention Program, and two prognostic models, the Framingham Offspring Risk Score, and the ARIC Model, demonstrate racial bias between non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks. We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, sampled in six independent two-year batches between 1999 and 2010. A total of 9,987 adults without a prior diagnosis of diabetes and with fasting blood samples available were included. We calculated race- and year-specific average predicted risks of type 2 diabetes according to the risk models. We compared the predicted risks with observed ones extracted from the US Diabetes Surveillance System across racial groups (summary calibration). All investigated models were found to be miscalibrated with regard to race, consistently across the survey years. The Framingham Offspring Risk Score overestimated type 2 diabetes risk for non-Hispanic Whites and underestimated risk for non-Hispanic Blacks. The PRT and the ARIC models overestimated risk for both races, but more so for non-Hispanic Whites. These landmark models overestimated the risk of type 2 diabetes for non-Hispanic Whites more severely than for non-Hispanic Blacks. This may result in a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Whites being prioritized for preventive interventions, but it also increases the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in this group. On the other hand, a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks may be potentially underprioritized and undertreated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001556 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_185a4754f8e14e5591c2f9dd60ecc9e5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_185a4754f8e14e5591c2f9dd60ecc9e5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2815247057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtPGzEURi0EApTyD1DlJZukfoxfK4Qi2iIhddOuLY99PXE6GQ_2BIl_z9CkCFa2fL977OuD0DUlK8oV_bbN-zK4fjV242ZFCKFCyBN0yZRUS86VOP2wv0BXtW7nENOUKMPP0cWMMMJoeYnWd7VCrWnocHE-uR63yVWcBjy9jIAZDsm1MEHFJdW_eCwQkp9SHrDru1zStNnVL-gsur7C1XFdoD_f73-vfy4ff_14WN89Lj1nRC69kJGbQKj3jWRADPec08ja0LROR-KZjMANaOOD8TKoOI-qGyraoDVzkS_Qw4EbstvasaSdKy82u2T_HeTSWVem5HuwVAvXKNFEDbQBIQz1LJoQJAHvDYiZdXtgjft2B8HDMBXXf4J-rgxpY7v8bCmhhnLKZ8LNkVDy0x7qZHepeuh7N0DeVzv_tmCNIkLN0eYQ9SXXWiC-30OJffNpjz7tm0979Dm3ff34xvem__b4K0zrn-s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2815247057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing racial bias in type 2 diabetes risk prediction algorithms</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Cronjé, Héléne T ; Katsiferis, Alexandros ; Elsenburg, Leonie K ; Andersen, Thea O ; Rod, Naja H ; Nguyen, Tri-Long ; Varga, Tibor V</creator><contributor>Hong, Young-Rock</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cronjé, Héléne T ; Katsiferis, Alexandros ; Elsenburg, Leonie K ; Andersen, Thea O ; Rod, Naja H ; Nguyen, Tri-Long ; Varga, Tibor V ; Hong, Young-Rock</creatorcontrib><description>Risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes can be useful for the early detection of individuals at high risk. However, models may also bias clinical decision-making processes, for instance by differential risk miscalibration across racial groups. We investigated whether the Prediabetes Risk Test (PRT) issued by the National Diabetes Prevention Program, and two prognostic models, the Framingham Offspring Risk Score, and the ARIC Model, demonstrate racial bias between non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks. We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, sampled in six independent two-year batches between 1999 and 2010. A total of 9,987 adults without a prior diagnosis of diabetes and with fasting blood samples available were included. We calculated race- and year-specific average predicted risks of type 2 diabetes according to the risk models. We compared the predicted risks with observed ones extracted from the US Diabetes Surveillance System across racial groups (summary calibration). All investigated models were found to be miscalibrated with regard to race, consistently across the survey years. The Framingham Offspring Risk Score overestimated type 2 diabetes risk for non-Hispanic Whites and underestimated risk for non-Hispanic Blacks. The PRT and the ARIC models overestimated risk for both races, but more so for non-Hispanic Whites. These landmark models overestimated the risk of type 2 diabetes for non-Hispanic Whites more severely than for non-Hispanic Blacks. This may result in a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Whites being prioritized for preventive interventions, but it also increases the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in this group. On the other hand, a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks may be potentially underprioritized and undertreated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37195986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods</subject><ispartof>PLOS global public health, 2023, Vol.3 (5), p.e0001556-e0001556</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Cronjé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>2023 Cronjé et al 2023 Cronjé et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2383-699X ; 0000-0002-0957-9835 ; 0000-0002-6376-7212</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191313/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191313/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37195986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hong, Young-Rock</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cronjé, Héléne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsiferis, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsenburg, Leonie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Thea O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rod, Naja H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tri-Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varga, Tibor V</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing racial bias in type 2 diabetes risk prediction algorithms</title><title>PLOS global public health</title><addtitle>PLOS Glob Public Health</addtitle><description>Risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes can be useful for the early detection of individuals at high risk. However, models may also bias clinical decision-making processes, for instance by differential risk miscalibration across racial groups. We investigated whether the Prediabetes Risk Test (PRT) issued by the National Diabetes Prevention Program, and two prognostic models, the Framingham Offspring Risk Score, and the ARIC Model, demonstrate racial bias between non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks. We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, sampled in six independent two-year batches between 1999 and 2010. A total of 9,987 adults without a prior diagnosis of diabetes and with fasting blood samples available were included. We calculated race- and year-specific average predicted risks of type 2 diabetes according to the risk models. We compared the predicted risks with observed ones extracted from the US Diabetes Surveillance System across racial groups (summary calibration). All investigated models were found to be miscalibrated with regard to race, consistently across the survey years. The Framingham Offspring Risk Score overestimated type 2 diabetes risk for non-Hispanic Whites and underestimated risk for non-Hispanic Blacks. The PRT and the ARIC models overestimated risk for both races, but more so for non-Hispanic Whites. These landmark models overestimated the risk of type 2 diabetes for non-Hispanic Whites more severely than for non-Hispanic Blacks. This may result in a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Whites being prioritized for preventive interventions, but it also increases the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in this group. On the other hand, a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks may be potentially underprioritized and undertreated.</description><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><issn>2767-3375</issn><issn>2767-3375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtPGzEURi0EApTyD1DlJZukfoxfK4Qi2iIhddOuLY99PXE6GQ_2BIl_z9CkCFa2fL977OuD0DUlK8oV_bbN-zK4fjV242ZFCKFCyBN0yZRUS86VOP2wv0BXtW7nENOUKMPP0cWMMMJoeYnWd7VCrWnocHE-uR63yVWcBjy9jIAZDsm1MEHFJdW_eCwQkp9SHrDru1zStNnVL-gsur7C1XFdoD_f73-vfy4ff_14WN89Lj1nRC69kJGbQKj3jWRADPec08ja0LROR-KZjMANaOOD8TKoOI-qGyraoDVzkS_Qw4EbstvasaSdKy82u2T_HeTSWVem5HuwVAvXKNFEDbQBIQz1LJoQJAHvDYiZdXtgjft2B8HDMBXXf4J-rgxpY7v8bCmhhnLKZ8LNkVDy0x7qZHepeuh7N0DeVzv_tmCNIkLN0eYQ9SXXWiC-30OJffNpjz7tm0979Dm3ff34xvem__b4K0zrn-s</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Cronjé, Héléne T</creator><creator>Katsiferis, Alexandros</creator><creator>Elsenburg, Leonie K</creator><creator>Andersen, Thea O</creator><creator>Rod, Naja H</creator><creator>Nguyen, Tri-Long</creator><creator>Varga, Tibor V</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2383-699X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-9835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-7212</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Assessing racial bias in type 2 diabetes risk prediction algorithms</title><author>Cronjé, Héléne T ; Katsiferis, Alexandros ; Elsenburg, Leonie K ; Andersen, Thea O ; Rod, Naja H ; Nguyen, Tri-Long ; Varga, Tibor V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cronjé, Héléne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsiferis, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsenburg, Leonie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Thea O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rod, Naja H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tri-Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varga, Tibor V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLOS global public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cronjé, Héléne T</au><au>Katsiferis, Alexandros</au><au>Elsenburg, Leonie K</au><au>Andersen, Thea O</au><au>Rod, Naja H</au><au>Nguyen, Tri-Long</au><au>Varga, Tibor V</au><au>Hong, Young-Rock</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing racial bias in type 2 diabetes risk prediction algorithms</atitle><jtitle>PLOS global public health</jtitle><addtitle>PLOS Glob Public Health</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0001556</spage><epage>e0001556</epage><pages>e0001556-e0001556</pages><issn>2767-3375</issn><eissn>2767-3375</eissn><abstract>Risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes can be useful for the early detection of individuals at high risk. However, models may also bias clinical decision-making processes, for instance by differential risk miscalibration across racial groups. We investigated whether the Prediabetes Risk Test (PRT) issued by the National Diabetes Prevention Program, and two prognostic models, the Framingham Offspring Risk Score, and the ARIC Model, demonstrate racial bias between non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks. We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, sampled in six independent two-year batches between 1999 and 2010. A total of 9,987 adults without a prior diagnosis of diabetes and with fasting blood samples available were included. We calculated race- and year-specific average predicted risks of type 2 diabetes according to the risk models. We compared the predicted risks with observed ones extracted from the US Diabetes Surveillance System across racial groups (summary calibration). All investigated models were found to be miscalibrated with regard to race, consistently across the survey years. The Framingham Offspring Risk Score overestimated type 2 diabetes risk for non-Hispanic Whites and underestimated risk for non-Hispanic Blacks. The PRT and the ARIC models overestimated risk for both races, but more so for non-Hispanic Whites. These landmark models overestimated the risk of type 2 diabetes for non-Hispanic Whites more severely than for non-Hispanic Blacks. This may result in a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Whites being prioritized for preventive interventions, but it also increases the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in this group. On the other hand, a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks may be potentially underprioritized and undertreated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37195986</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pgph.0001556</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2383-699X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-9835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-7212</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3375 |
ispartof | PLOS global public health, 2023, Vol.3 (5), p.e0001556-e0001556 |
issn | 2767-3375 2767-3375 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_185a4754f8e14e5591c2f9dd60ecc9e5 |
source | PubMed (Medline) |
subjects | Medicine and Health Sciences Physical Sciences Research and Analysis Methods |
title | Assessing racial bias in type 2 diabetes risk prediction algorithms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20racial%20bias%20in%20type%202%20diabetes%20risk%20prediction%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20global%20public%20health&rft.au=Cronj%C3%A9,%20H%C3%A9l%C3%A9ne%20T&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0001556&rft.epage=e0001556&rft.pages=e0001556-e0001556&rft.issn=2767-3375&rft.eissn=2767-3375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2815247057%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3206-c56f39d01cc462e093c331f2bd4ba8f0c26fe39e89cd9c6d7f1378415bd882af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2815247057&rft_id=info:pmid/37195986&rfr_iscdi=true |