Cognitive telerehabilitation: an expert consensus paper on current evidence and future perspective

• Published in: Frontiers in neurology 2024-02, Vol.15, p.1338873-1338873
• Main Authors: Maggio, Maria Grazia, Baglio, Francesca, Arcuri, Francesco, Borgnis, Francesca, Contrada, Marianna, Diaz, Marcos Daniel Maldonado, Leochico, Carl Froilan, Neira, Nicolas Jimenez, Laratta, Stefania, Suchan, Boris, Tonin, Paolo, Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: cognitive rehabilitation; neurological diseases; Neurology; neurorehabilitation; remote rehabilitation; telerehabilitation
• ISSN: 1664-2295; 1664-2295
• DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1338873

The progressive improvement of the living conditions and medical care of the population in industrialized countries has led to improvement in healthcare interventions, including rehabilitation. From this perspective, Telerehabilitation (TR) plays an important role. TR consists of the application of telemedicine to rehabilitation to offer remote rehabilitation services to the population unable to reach healthcare. TR integrates therapy-recovery-assistance, with continuity of treatments, aimed at neurological and psychological recovery, involving the patient in a family environment, with an active role also of the caregivers. This leads to reduced healthcare costs and improves the continuity of specialist care, as well as showing efficacy for the treatment of cognitive disorders, and leading to advantages for patients and their families, such as avoiding travel, reducing associated costs, improving the frequency, continuity, and comfort of performing the rehabilitation in its own spaces, times and arrangements. The aim of this consensus paper is to investigate the current evidence on the use and effectiveness of TR in the cognitive field, trying to also suggest some recommendations and future perspectives. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first consensus paper among multiple expert researchers that comprehensively examines TR in different neurological diseases. Our results supported the efficacy and feasibility of TR with good adherence and no adverse events among patients. Our consensus summarizes the current evidence for the application of cognitive TR in neurological populations, highlighting the potential of this tool, but also the limitations that need to be explored further.