Loading…

A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety

Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2021-01, Vol.11, p.603632-603632
Main Authors: Melchers, Klaus G, Petrig, Amadeus, Basch, Johannes M, Sauer, Juergen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813
container_end_page 603632
container_issue
container_start_page 603632
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 11
creator Melchers, Klaus G
Petrig, Amadeus
Basch, Johannes M
Sauer, Juergen
description Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_18d9370912b64ba1b21ef7c8ed5b82fe</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_18d9370912b64ba1b21ef7c8ed5b82fe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2483812586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUt1u0zAUjhCITWUPwA3yHVw0xT-Jk9wgVRWMSkMgNsSldWKfpJ4Su9hpoe-xByZpx9h8Yx-f78c--pLkNaMLIcrqfbONh3bBKacLSYUU_FlyzqTMUkaL8vmj81lyEeMtHVc2gil_mZwJkTMqi-o8uVuSle-3EGz0jvhmrNwe3WC9g46AM-QG9cb5zreH9AsaCwMaco0d6glD1m7AsLf4O5KfdtiQ79hCMGTw_zuI8S35hqHxoQencT4VGrcTP87J9RDAuvnRa-n-WBwOr5IXDXQRL-73WfLj08eb1ef06uvlerW8SnUm8yFlDdW6MRJ5JarMVAAM8oIybDKtM04ro5uqyiDnmeTjIPI6pwwEaqGlhpKJWbI-6RoPt2obbA_hoDxYdbzwoVUQBqs7VKw0lShoxXgtsxpYzUebQpdo8rrkDY5aH05a213do9HjDAN0T0SfdpzdqNbvVVGKXIw_mCXv7gWC_7XDOKjeRo1dBw79LiqelaJkPC_lCGUnqA4-xoDNgw2jagqHOoZDTeFQp3CMnDeP3_fA-BcF8RfgPLm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2483812586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Melchers, Klaus G ; Petrig, Amadeus ; Basch, Johannes M ; Sauer, Juergen</creator><creatorcontrib>Melchers, Klaus G ; Petrig, Amadeus ; Basch, Johannes M ; Sauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><description>Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33510679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>applicant perceptions ; interview anxiety ; interview performance ; personnel selection ; Psychology ; selection interviews ; technology-mediated interviews</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2021-01, Vol.11, p.603632-603632</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Melchers, Petrig, Basch and Sauer.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Melchers, Petrig, Basch and Sauer. 2021 Melchers, Petrig, Basch and Sauer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835329/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835329/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melchers, Klaus G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrig, Amadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Johannes M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.</description><subject>applicant perceptions</subject><subject>interview anxiety</subject><subject>interview performance</subject><subject>personnel selection</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>selection interviews</subject><subject>technology-mediated interviews</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUt1u0zAUjhCITWUPwA3yHVw0xT-Jk9wgVRWMSkMgNsSldWKfpJ4Su9hpoe-xByZpx9h8Yx-f78c--pLkNaMLIcrqfbONh3bBKacLSYUU_FlyzqTMUkaL8vmj81lyEeMtHVc2gil_mZwJkTMqi-o8uVuSle-3EGz0jvhmrNwe3WC9g46AM-QG9cb5zreH9AsaCwMaco0d6glD1m7AsLf4O5KfdtiQ79hCMGTw_zuI8S35hqHxoQencT4VGrcTP87J9RDAuvnRa-n-WBwOr5IXDXQRL-73WfLj08eb1ef06uvlerW8SnUm8yFlDdW6MRJ5JarMVAAM8oIybDKtM04ro5uqyiDnmeTjIPI6pwwEaqGlhpKJWbI-6RoPt2obbA_hoDxYdbzwoVUQBqs7VKw0lShoxXgtsxpYzUebQpdo8rrkDY5aH05a213do9HjDAN0T0SfdpzdqNbvVVGKXIw_mCXv7gWC_7XDOKjeRo1dBw79LiqelaJkPC_lCGUnqA4-xoDNgw2jagqHOoZDTeFQp3CMnDeP3_fA-BcF8RfgPLm8</recordid><startdate>20210112</startdate><enddate>20210112</enddate><creator>Melchers, Klaus G</creator><creator>Petrig, Amadeus</creator><creator>Basch, Johannes M</creator><creator>Sauer, Juergen</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210112</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</title><author>Melchers, Klaus G ; Petrig, Amadeus ; Basch, Johannes M ; Sauer, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>applicant perceptions</topic><topic>interview anxiety</topic><topic>interview performance</topic><topic>personnel selection</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>selection interviews</topic><topic>technology-mediated interviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melchers, Klaus G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrig, Amadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Johannes M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melchers, Klaus G</au><au>Petrig, Amadeus</au><au>Basch, Johannes M</au><au>Sauer, Juergen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-01-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>603632</spage><epage>603632</epage><pages>603632-603632</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>33510679</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2021-01, Vol.11, p.603632-603632
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_18d9370912b64ba1b21ef7c8ed5b82fe
source PubMed Central
subjects applicant perceptions
interview anxiety
interview performance
personnel selection
Psychology
selection interviews
technology-mediated interviews
title A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Conventional%20and%20Technology-Mediated%20Selection%20Interviews%20With%20Regard%20to%20Interviewees'%20Performance,%20Perceptions,%20Strain,%20and%20Anxiety&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Melchers,%20Klaus%20G&rft.date=2021-01-12&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=603632&rft.epage=603632&rft.pages=603632-603632&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2483812586%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2483812586&rft_id=info:pmid/33510679&rfr_iscdi=true