Loading…
A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety
Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2021-01, Vol.11, p.603632-603632 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813 |
container_end_page | 603632 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 603632 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Melchers, Klaus G Petrig, Amadeus Basch, Johannes M Sauer, Juergen |
description | Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_18d9370912b64ba1b21ef7c8ed5b82fe</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_18d9370912b64ba1b21ef7c8ed5b82fe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2483812586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUt1u0zAUjhCITWUPwA3yHVw0xT-Jk9wgVRWMSkMgNsSldWKfpJ4Su9hpoe-xByZpx9h8Yx-f78c--pLkNaMLIcrqfbONh3bBKacLSYUU_FlyzqTMUkaL8vmj81lyEeMtHVc2gil_mZwJkTMqi-o8uVuSle-3EGz0jvhmrNwe3WC9g46AM-QG9cb5zreH9AsaCwMaco0d6glD1m7AsLf4O5KfdtiQ79hCMGTw_zuI8S35hqHxoQencT4VGrcTP87J9RDAuvnRa-n-WBwOr5IXDXQRL-73WfLj08eb1ef06uvlerW8SnUm8yFlDdW6MRJ5JarMVAAM8oIybDKtM04ro5uqyiDnmeTjIPI6pwwEaqGlhpKJWbI-6RoPt2obbA_hoDxYdbzwoVUQBqs7VKw0lShoxXgtsxpYzUebQpdo8rrkDY5aH05a213do9HjDAN0T0SfdpzdqNbvVVGKXIw_mCXv7gWC_7XDOKjeRo1dBw79LiqelaJkPC_lCGUnqA4-xoDNgw2jagqHOoZDTeFQp3CMnDeP3_fA-BcF8RfgPLm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2483812586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Melchers, Klaus G ; Petrig, Amadeus ; Basch, Johannes M ; Sauer, Juergen</creator><creatorcontrib>Melchers, Klaus G ; Petrig, Amadeus ; Basch, Johannes M ; Sauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><description>Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33510679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>applicant perceptions ; interview anxiety ; interview performance ; personnel selection ; Psychology ; selection interviews ; technology-mediated interviews</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2021-01, Vol.11, p.603632-603632</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Melchers, Petrig, Basch and Sauer.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Melchers, Petrig, Basch and Sauer. 2021 Melchers, Petrig, Basch and Sauer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835329/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835329/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melchers, Klaus G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrig, Amadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Johannes M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.</description><subject>applicant perceptions</subject><subject>interview anxiety</subject><subject>interview performance</subject><subject>personnel selection</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>selection interviews</subject><subject>technology-mediated interviews</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUt1u0zAUjhCITWUPwA3yHVw0xT-Jk9wgVRWMSkMgNsSldWKfpJ4Su9hpoe-xByZpx9h8Yx-f78c--pLkNaMLIcrqfbONh3bBKacLSYUU_FlyzqTMUkaL8vmj81lyEeMtHVc2gil_mZwJkTMqi-o8uVuSle-3EGz0jvhmrNwe3WC9g46AM-QG9cb5zreH9AsaCwMaco0d6glD1m7AsLf4O5KfdtiQ79hCMGTw_zuI8S35hqHxoQencT4VGrcTP87J9RDAuvnRa-n-WBwOr5IXDXQRL-73WfLj08eb1ef06uvlerW8SnUm8yFlDdW6MRJ5JarMVAAM8oIybDKtM04ro5uqyiDnmeTjIPI6pwwEaqGlhpKJWbI-6RoPt2obbA_hoDxYdbzwoVUQBqs7VKw0lShoxXgtsxpYzUebQpdo8rrkDY5aH05a213do9HjDAN0T0SfdpzdqNbvVVGKXIw_mCXv7gWC_7XDOKjeRo1dBw79LiqelaJkPC_lCGUnqA4-xoDNgw2jagqHOoZDTeFQp3CMnDeP3_fA-BcF8RfgPLm8</recordid><startdate>20210112</startdate><enddate>20210112</enddate><creator>Melchers, Klaus G</creator><creator>Petrig, Amadeus</creator><creator>Basch, Johannes M</creator><creator>Sauer, Juergen</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210112</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</title><author>Melchers, Klaus G ; Petrig, Amadeus ; Basch, Johannes M ; Sauer, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>applicant perceptions</topic><topic>interview anxiety</topic><topic>interview performance</topic><topic>personnel selection</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>selection interviews</topic><topic>technology-mediated interviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melchers, Klaus G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrig, Amadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Johannes M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melchers, Klaus G</au><au>Petrig, Amadeus</au><au>Basch, Johannes M</au><au>Sauer, Juergen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-01-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>603632</spage><epage>603632</epage><pages>603632-603632</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Organizations increasingly use technology-mediated interviews. However, only limited research is available concerning the comparability of different interview media and most of the available studies stem from a time when technology-mediated interviews were less common than in the present time. In an experiment using simulated selection interviews, we compared traditional face-to-face (FTF) interviews with telephone and videoconference interviews to determine whether ratings of interviewees' performance, their perceptions of the interview, or their strain and anxiety are affected by the type of interview. Before participating in the actual interview, participants had a more positive view of FTF interviews compared to technology-mediated interviews. However, fairness perceptions did not differ anymore after the interview. Furthermore, there were no differences between the three interview media concerning psychological and physiological indicators of strain or interview anxiety. Nevertheless, ratings of interviewees' performance were lower in the technology-mediated interviews than in FTF interviews. Thus, differences between different interview media can still be found nowadays even though most applicants are much more familiar with technology-mediated communication than in the past. The results show that organizations should take this into account and therefore avoid using different interview media when they interview different applicants for the same job opening.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>33510679</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2021-01, Vol.11, p.603632-603632 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_18d9370912b64ba1b21ef7c8ed5b82fe |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | applicant perceptions interview anxiety interview performance personnel selection Psychology selection interviews technology-mediated interviews |
title | A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Conventional%20and%20Technology-Mediated%20Selection%20Interviews%20With%20Regard%20to%20Interviewees'%20Performance,%20Perceptions,%20Strain,%20and%20Anxiety&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Melchers,%20Klaus%20G&rft.date=2021-01-12&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=603632&rft.epage=603632&rft.pages=603632-603632&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2483812586%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-1f0ccfd6e29394d9aa1a5701ef4cc4209dcf994a524620785b501a3ec3c6ca813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2483812586&rft_id=info:pmid/33510679&rfr_iscdi=true |