Loading…

The European Union's Trade Negotiations with the ACP: Entrapped by its Own Rhetorical Strategy?

This paper deals with the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union (EU) and the group of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It addresses the question why the EU firmly insisted on upholding the negotiating deadline for these new trade agreements, despite the ver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Romanian journal of European affairs 2008-12, Vol.8 (4), p.49-62
Main Author: Drieghe, Lotte
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 62
container_issue 4
container_start_page 49
container_title Romanian journal of European affairs
container_volume 8
creator Drieghe, Lotte
description This paper deals with the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union (EU) and the group of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It addresses the question why the EU firmly insisted on upholding the negotiating deadline for these new trade agreements, despite the very damaging consequences; these hastily initialed trade deals entailed. Regional integration in the South was hampered; the development of the friendly image of the EU got a serious blow; the EU did not manage to include the WTO plus issues, and the prospect of full EPAs at later stage is not guaranteed. We first qualify the Union's argument to the expiry of a waiver by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which legitimized the former trade regime, and placed an external and insurmountable pressure on the negotiations. There is no rational explanation for Europe's harsh attitude on the EPA deadline, since neither legal, nor economic interests would have been harmed, if the deadline had been postponed. The main argument advanced in this article addresses whether the EU had to push through these trade deals, because it had entrapped itself through its own 'rhetorical action'. In its negotiation discourse, the European Commission (EC) had so often emphasized the deadline together with the fact that there were no alternatives to EPAs, that it could not change its mind overnight, when at the end of the 2007 negotiations they were still going nowhere. The Union was forced to keep up with the deadline it had imposed upon itself with the risk of losing all its credibility. Adapted from the source document.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_190b46e01f574aa6a50f784c6a40d16b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_190b46e01f574aa6a50f784c6a40d16b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>59918246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d213t-3dca144b6164ad0669a7e22a70759fe7dafdfdaa04968c5ebe552dd65e87973f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjF1LwzAYhYsoOOb-Q670qpCk-Wi9kTGmDoaKbtfhbfN2y-iammSM_XuLem7O4ZzDc5VNWClYLrgurscsS56XXLPbbBbjgY4qClYxPsnMZo9keQp-QOjJtne-f4hkE8AiecOdTw7S2EVydmlP0nieLz4eybJPAYYBLakvxKVI3s89-dxj8sE10JGvcU64uzzdZTctdBFn_z7Nts_LzeI1X7-_rBbzdW45K1Je2AaYELViSoClSlWgkXPQVMuqRW2hta0FoKJSZSOxRim5tUpiqStdtMU0W_1xrYeDGYI7QrgYD878Fj7sDITkmg4Nq2gtFFLWSi0AFEja6lI0CgS1TNUj6_6PNQT_fcKYzNHFBrsOevSnaGRVsZILVfwAHVJr0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59918246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The European Union's Trade Negotiations with the ACP: Entrapped by its Own Rhetorical Strategy?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Drieghe, Lotte</creator><creatorcontrib>Drieghe, Lotte</creatorcontrib><description>This paper deals with the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union (EU) and the group of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It addresses the question why the EU firmly insisted on upholding the negotiating deadline for these new trade agreements, despite the very damaging consequences; these hastily initialed trade deals entailed. Regional integration in the South was hampered; the development of the friendly image of the EU got a serious blow; the EU did not manage to include the WTO plus issues, and the prospect of full EPAs at later stage is not guaranteed. We first qualify the Union's argument to the expiry of a waiver by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which legitimized the former trade regime, and placed an external and insurmountable pressure on the negotiations. There is no rational explanation for Europe's harsh attitude on the EPA deadline, since neither legal, nor economic interests would have been harmed, if the deadline had been postponed. The main argument advanced in this article addresses whether the EU had to push through these trade deals, because it had entrapped itself through its own 'rhetorical action'. In its negotiation discourse, the European Commission (EC) had so often emphasized the deadline together with the fact that there were no alternatives to EPAs, that it could not change its mind overnight, when at the end of the 2007 negotiations they were still going nowhere. The Union was forced to keep up with the deadline it had imposed upon itself with the risk of losing all its credibility. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1582-8271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1841-4273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>European Institute of Romania</publisher><subject>ACP ; Africa ; Attitudes ; Discourse ; Economic Partnership Agreements ; EU trade policy ; European Union ; International Trade ; Negotiation ; negotiation strategy ; Rhetoric ; rhetorical entrapment ; Trade ; WTO</subject><ispartof>Romanian journal of European affairs, 2008-12, Vol.8 (4), p.49-62</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drieghe, Lotte</creatorcontrib><title>The European Union's Trade Negotiations with the ACP: Entrapped by its Own Rhetorical Strategy?</title><title>Romanian journal of European affairs</title><description>This paper deals with the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union (EU) and the group of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It addresses the question why the EU firmly insisted on upholding the negotiating deadline for these new trade agreements, despite the very damaging consequences; these hastily initialed trade deals entailed. Regional integration in the South was hampered; the development of the friendly image of the EU got a serious blow; the EU did not manage to include the WTO plus issues, and the prospect of full EPAs at later stage is not guaranteed. We first qualify the Union's argument to the expiry of a waiver by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which legitimized the former trade regime, and placed an external and insurmountable pressure on the negotiations. There is no rational explanation for Europe's harsh attitude on the EPA deadline, since neither legal, nor economic interests would have been harmed, if the deadline had been postponed. The main argument advanced in this article addresses whether the EU had to push through these trade deals, because it had entrapped itself through its own 'rhetorical action'. In its negotiation discourse, the European Commission (EC) had so often emphasized the deadline together with the fact that there were no alternatives to EPAs, that it could not change its mind overnight, when at the end of the 2007 negotiations they were still going nowhere. The Union was forced to keep up with the deadline it had imposed upon itself with the risk of losing all its credibility. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>ACP</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Economic Partnership Agreements</subject><subject>EU trade policy</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>International Trade</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>negotiation strategy</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>rhetorical entrapment</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>WTO</subject><issn>1582-8271</issn><issn>1841-4273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjF1LwzAYhYsoOOb-Q670qpCk-Wi9kTGmDoaKbtfhbfN2y-iammSM_XuLem7O4ZzDc5VNWClYLrgurscsS56XXLPbbBbjgY4qClYxPsnMZo9keQp-QOjJtne-f4hkE8AiecOdTw7S2EVydmlP0nieLz4eybJPAYYBLakvxKVI3s89-dxj8sE10JGvcU64uzzdZTctdBFn_z7Nts_LzeI1X7-_rBbzdW45K1Je2AaYELViSoClSlWgkXPQVMuqRW2hta0FoKJSZSOxRim5tUpiqStdtMU0W_1xrYeDGYI7QrgYD878Fj7sDITkmg4Nq2gtFFLWSi0AFEja6lI0CgS1TNUj6_6PNQT_fcKYzNHFBrsOevSnaGRVsZILVfwAHVJr0A</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Drieghe, Lotte</creator><general>European Institute of Romania</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>The European Union's Trade Negotiations with the ACP: Entrapped by its Own Rhetorical Strategy?</title><author>Drieghe, Lotte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d213t-3dca144b6164ad0669a7e22a70759fe7dafdfdaa04968c5ebe552dd65e87973f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ACP</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Economic Partnership Agreements</topic><topic>EU trade policy</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>International Trade</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>negotiation strategy</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>rhetorical entrapment</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>WTO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drieghe, Lotte</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Romanian journal of European affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drieghe, Lotte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The European Union's Trade Negotiations with the ACP: Entrapped by its Own Rhetorical Strategy?</atitle><jtitle>Romanian journal of European affairs</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>49-62</pages><issn>1582-8271</issn><eissn>1841-4273</eissn><abstract>This paper deals with the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union (EU) and the group of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It addresses the question why the EU firmly insisted on upholding the negotiating deadline for these new trade agreements, despite the very damaging consequences; these hastily initialed trade deals entailed. Regional integration in the South was hampered; the development of the friendly image of the EU got a serious blow; the EU did not manage to include the WTO plus issues, and the prospect of full EPAs at later stage is not guaranteed. We first qualify the Union's argument to the expiry of a waiver by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which legitimized the former trade regime, and placed an external and insurmountable pressure on the negotiations. There is no rational explanation for Europe's harsh attitude on the EPA deadline, since neither legal, nor economic interests would have been harmed, if the deadline had been postponed. The main argument advanced in this article addresses whether the EU had to push through these trade deals, because it had entrapped itself through its own 'rhetorical action'. In its negotiation discourse, the European Commission (EC) had so often emphasized the deadline together with the fact that there were no alternatives to EPAs, that it could not change its mind overnight, when at the end of the 2007 negotiations they were still going nowhere. The Union was forced to keep up with the deadline it had imposed upon itself with the risk of losing all its credibility. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><pub>European Institute of Romania</pub><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1582-8271
ispartof Romanian journal of European affairs, 2008-12, Vol.8 (4), p.49-62
issn 1582-8271
1841-4273
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_190b46e01f574aa6a50f784c6a40d16b
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects ACP
Africa
Attitudes
Discourse
Economic Partnership Agreements
EU trade policy
European Union
International Trade
Negotiation
negotiation strategy
Rhetoric
rhetorical entrapment
Trade
WTO
title The European Union's Trade Negotiations with the ACP: Entrapped by its Own Rhetorical Strategy?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20European%20Union's%20Trade%20Negotiations%20with%20the%20ACP:%20Entrapped%20by%20its%20Own%20Rhetorical%20Strategy?&rft.jtitle=Romanian%20journal%20of%20European%20affairs&rft.au=Drieghe,%20Lotte&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=49-62&rft.issn=1582-8271&rft.eissn=1841-4273&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E59918246%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d213t-3dca144b6164ad0669a7e22a70759fe7dafdfdaa04968c5ebe552dd65e87973f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59918246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true