Leaderships in Urban Contexts of Diversity and Innovation: The Porto Maravilha Case

This article investigates the role and ways of action of leaderships in urban contexts characterized by urban revitalization processes (RJ/Brazil). Adopting as its theoretical basis the bibliographical review of the literature on leadership and public area requalification processes, as well as resea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BAR, Brazilian administration review Brazilian administration review, 2015-07, Vol.12 (3), p.268-287
Main Authors: de Oliveira, Fatima Bayma, Sant'Anna, Anderson de Souza, Diniz, Daniela Martins, Neto, Antonio Moreira de Carvalho
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case studies
Cities
Citizen participation
Civil society
Investigations
Leadership
MANAGEMENT
Methods
Multiculturalism
Public administration
shared leadership
local powers
urban revitalization
innovation in cities
Studies
Urban planning
Urban renewal
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article investigates the role and ways of action of leaderships in urban contexts characterized by urban revitalization processes (RJ/Brazil). Adopting as its theoretical basis the bibliographical review of the literature on leadership and public area requalification processes, as well as research conducted by Jacobs (2011) on diversity and innovation, the present research may be characterized as qualitative in nature (case study). Results indicate that the Porto Maravilha project has transposed business concepts to public administration. Today, the keynote lies in the attraction of new enterprises and in the construction of urban revitalization projects for the city's makeover. With regard to the leadership, although public leadership has apparently adopted management instruments for decentralizing management and for public participation, these measures were not enough to achieve an effectively shared leadership that would reflect the multiple interests of different actors (as the theory of relational leadership presupposes). Thus, a set of contradictions and dilemmas for the leaders is apparent, among them: how to build an effectively-shared leadership, as every urban transformation project depends on the negotiation and complex interaction between different social actors?
ISSN:1807-7692
1807-7692
1982-7849
DOI:10.1590/1807-7692bar2015140080