Loading…

Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries

This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe 2023-01, Vol.26 (4), p.141-162
Main Authors: Kochaniak, Katarzyna, Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena, Huterska, Agnieszka Anna, Demirhan, Dilek, Susmuş, Türker
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943
container_end_page 162
container_issue 4
container_start_page 141
container_title Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe
container_volume 26
creator Kochaniak, Katarzyna
Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena
Huterska, Agnieszka Anna
Demirhan, Dilek
Susmuş, Türker
description This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.
doi_str_mv 10.18778/1508-2008.26.35
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_193051b5e5954aacad3516e8cef7a0fe</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1206535</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_193051b5e5954aacad3516e8cef7a0fe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1206535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1uFDEQhS1EJIbAng2SL9BD2W7_9ApFwwRGCiJSkrXlcZfBo057ZLuR2HEFrpiT4EyibKpK71V9i1eEfGCwZkZr84lJMB0HMGuu1kK-IisOhndKC_2arF7cN-RtKQcAZQRnK1K_JCy0_kJ67eaHv_-2S05HdDO9xlzS7KY2zCWmJuQ0Lr7SmyVWejFNn-multPaEX2NvxsmzifS9o5-x_s9ZurmkW5aiaOrSDdpmWuOWN6Rs-Cmgu-f-zm5vdzebr51Vz--7jYXV50XRtSOaxh02Gvdo1IaOFdMjINnau8YCB4YR2DBc2_ACand2AcTRum9G2U_9OKc7J6wY3IHe8zx3uU_NrloT0LKP63LNfoJLRsESLaXKAfZO9cIQjKFxmPQDgI2FjyxfE6lZAwvPAb29AD7GLF9jNhyZYVsJx-fTxDTZA9pyS3PYhkHJZv_H7wUgx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kochaniak, Katarzyna ; Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena ; Huterska, Agnieszka Anna ; Demirhan, Dilek ; Susmuş, Türker</creator><creatorcontrib>Kochaniak, Katarzyna ; Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena ; Huterska, Agnieszka Anna ; Demirhan, Dilek ; Susmuş, Türker</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1508-2008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2082-6737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18778/1508-2008.26.35</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</publisher><subject>EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment ; Government/Political systems ; household ; pan‑european personal pension product ; public pension schemes ; retirement ; saving for old age ; Welfare systems</subject><ispartof>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe, 2023-01, Vol.26 (4), p.141-162</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9809-5260 ; 0000-0001-6507-2927 ; 0000-0002-4722-2853</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2023_79527.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirhan, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susmuş, Türker</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</title><title>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe</title><addtitle>Comparative Economic Research Central and Eastern Europe</addtitle><description>This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.</description><subject>EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subject><subject>Government/Political systems</subject><subject>household</subject><subject>pan‑european personal pension product</subject><subject>public pension schemes</subject><subject>retirement</subject><subject>saving for old age</subject><subject>Welfare systems</subject><issn>1508-2008</issn><issn>2082-6737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1uFDEQhS1EJIbAng2SL9BD2W7_9ApFwwRGCiJSkrXlcZfBo057ZLuR2HEFrpiT4EyibKpK71V9i1eEfGCwZkZr84lJMB0HMGuu1kK-IisOhndKC_2arF7cN-RtKQcAZQRnK1K_JCy0_kJ67eaHv_-2S05HdDO9xlzS7KY2zCWmJuQ0Lr7SmyVWejFNn-multPaEX2NvxsmzifS9o5-x_s9ZurmkW5aiaOrSDdpmWuOWN6Rs-Cmgu-f-zm5vdzebr51Vz--7jYXV50XRtSOaxh02Gvdo1IaOFdMjINnau8YCB4YR2DBc2_ACand2AcTRum9G2U_9OKc7J6wY3IHe8zx3uU_NrloT0LKP63LNfoJLRsESLaXKAfZO9cIQjKFxmPQDgI2FjyxfE6lZAwvPAb29AD7GLF9jNhyZYVsJx-fTxDTZA9pyS3PYhkHJZv_H7wUgx0</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</creator><creator>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</creator><creator>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</creator><creator>Demirhan, Dilek</creator><creator>Susmuş, Türker</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</general><general>Lodz University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-5260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-2927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-2853</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</title><author>Kochaniak, Katarzyna ; Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena ; Huterska, Agnieszka Anna ; Demirhan, Dilek ; Susmuş, Türker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</topic><topic>Government/Political systems</topic><topic>household</topic><topic>pan‑european personal pension product</topic><topic>public pension schemes</topic><topic>retirement</topic><topic>saving for old age</topic><topic>Welfare systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirhan, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susmuş, Türker</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</au><au>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</au><au>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</au><au>Demirhan, Dilek</au><au>Susmuş, Türker</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</atitle><jtitle>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe</jtitle><addtitle>Comparative Economic Research Central and Eastern Europe</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>141-162</pages><issn>1508-2008</issn><eissn>2082-6737</eissn><abstract>This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.</abstract><pub>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</pub><doi>10.18778/1508-2008.26.35</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-5260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-2927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-2853</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1508-2008
ispartof Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe, 2023-01, Vol.26 (4), p.141-162
issn 1508-2008
2082-6737
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_193051b5e5954aacad3516e8cef7a0fe
source ABI/INFORM Collection; Business Source Ultimate; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment
Government/Political systems
household
pan‑european personal pension product
public pension schemes
retirement
saving for old age
Welfare systems
title Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Pan%E2%80%91European%20Personal%20Pension%20Product%20Suit%20All?%20Its%20Perspectives%20in%20the%20EU%20Member%20and%20Candidate%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20economic%20research.%20Central%20and%20Eastern%20Europe&rft.au=Kochaniak,%20Katarzyna&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=141-162&rft.issn=1508-2008&rft.eissn=2082-6737&rft_id=info:doi/10.18778/1508-2008.26.35&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_doaj_%3E1206535%3C/ceeol_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1206535&rfr_iscdi=true