Loading…
Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries
This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The...
Saved in:
Published in: | Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe 2023-01, Vol.26 (4), p.141-162 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943 |
container_end_page | 162 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Kochaniak, Katarzyna Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena Huterska, Agnieszka Anna Demirhan, Dilek Susmuş, Türker |
description | This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18778/1508-2008.26.35 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_193051b5e5954aacad3516e8cef7a0fe</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1206535</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_193051b5e5954aacad3516e8cef7a0fe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1206535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1uFDEQhS1EJIbAng2SL9BD2W7_9ApFwwRGCiJSkrXlcZfBo057ZLuR2HEFrpiT4EyibKpK71V9i1eEfGCwZkZr84lJMB0HMGuu1kK-IisOhndKC_2arF7cN-RtKQcAZQRnK1K_JCy0_kJ67eaHv_-2S05HdDO9xlzS7KY2zCWmJuQ0Lr7SmyVWejFNn-multPaEX2NvxsmzifS9o5-x_s9ZurmkW5aiaOrSDdpmWuOWN6Rs-Cmgu-f-zm5vdzebr51Vz--7jYXV50XRtSOaxh02Gvdo1IaOFdMjINnau8YCB4YR2DBc2_ACand2AcTRum9G2U_9OKc7J6wY3IHe8zx3uU_NrloT0LKP63LNfoJLRsESLaXKAfZO9cIQjKFxmPQDgI2FjyxfE6lZAwvPAb29AD7GLF9jNhyZYVsJx-fTxDTZA9pyS3PYhkHJZv_H7wUgx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kochaniak, Katarzyna ; Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena ; Huterska, Agnieszka Anna ; Demirhan, Dilek ; Susmuş, Türker</creator><creatorcontrib>Kochaniak, Katarzyna ; Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena ; Huterska, Agnieszka Anna ; Demirhan, Dilek ; Susmuş, Türker</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1508-2008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2082-6737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18778/1508-2008.26.35</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</publisher><subject>EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment ; Government/Political systems ; household ; pan‑european personal pension product ; public pension schemes ; retirement ; saving for old age ; Welfare systems</subject><ispartof>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe, 2023-01, Vol.26 (4), p.141-162</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9809-5260 ; 0000-0001-6507-2927 ; 0000-0002-4722-2853</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2023_79527.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirhan, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susmuş, Türker</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</title><title>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe</title><addtitle>Comparative Economic Research Central and Eastern Europe</addtitle><description>This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.</description><subject>EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subject><subject>Government/Political systems</subject><subject>household</subject><subject>pan‑european personal pension product</subject><subject>public pension schemes</subject><subject>retirement</subject><subject>saving for old age</subject><subject>Welfare systems</subject><issn>1508-2008</issn><issn>2082-6737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1uFDEQhS1EJIbAng2SL9BD2W7_9ApFwwRGCiJSkrXlcZfBo057ZLuR2HEFrpiT4EyibKpK71V9i1eEfGCwZkZr84lJMB0HMGuu1kK-IisOhndKC_2arF7cN-RtKQcAZQRnK1K_JCy0_kJ67eaHv_-2S05HdDO9xlzS7KY2zCWmJuQ0Lr7SmyVWejFNn-multPaEX2NvxsmzifS9o5-x_s9ZurmkW5aiaOrSDdpmWuOWN6Rs-Cmgu-f-zm5vdzebr51Vz--7jYXV50XRtSOaxh02Gvdo1IaOFdMjINnau8YCB4YR2DBc2_ACand2AcTRum9G2U_9OKc7J6wY3IHe8zx3uU_NrloT0LKP63LNfoJLRsESLaXKAfZO9cIQjKFxmPQDgI2FjyxfE6lZAwvPAb29AD7GLF9jNhyZYVsJx-fTxDTZA9pyS3PYhkHJZv_H7wUgx0</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</creator><creator>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</creator><creator>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</creator><creator>Demirhan, Dilek</creator><creator>Susmuş, Türker</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</general><general>Lodz University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-5260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-2927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-2853</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</title><author>Kochaniak, Katarzyna ; Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena ; Huterska, Agnieszka Anna ; Demirhan, Dilek ; Susmuş, Türker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</topic><topic>Government/Political systems</topic><topic>household</topic><topic>pan‑european personal pension product</topic><topic>public pension schemes</topic><topic>retirement</topic><topic>saving for old age</topic><topic>Welfare systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirhan, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susmuş, Türker</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kochaniak, Katarzyna</au><au>Korzeniowska, Anna Magdalena</au><au>Huterska, Agnieszka Anna</au><au>Demirhan, Dilek</au><au>Susmuş, Türker</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries</atitle><jtitle>Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe</jtitle><addtitle>Comparative Economic Research Central and Eastern Europe</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>141-162</pages><issn>1508-2008</issn><eissn>2082-6737</eissn><abstract>This article aims to verify the development prospects of the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the relationship between the quality of domestic public pension schemes and household savings for old age in the EU member and candidate countries. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage examined the interrelationship between public pension schemes and household savings based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. In the second stage, sub‑samples of countries with high and low‑quality public pension schemes were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed significant links between households’ obligatory and voluntary saving for retirement in both samples. However, the study recognised the internal diversity of countries in terms of households’ preferences for the types of financial assets. Based on these findings, conclusions about the development potential of PEPP are drawn. The best prospects are identified for Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. In most of these countries (except for France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain), the PEPP could serve as an alternative to household liquid assets. However, in Croatia, France and Italy, it was recognised as competing with existing domestic retirement and life insurance products, which may negatively impact its development. This is the first comprehensive study of the prospects of PEPP in a large group of countries. The results provide socially essential knowledge as they address the role of private savings in supplementing households’ future income from public pension schemes, considering the availability of a new product such as PEPP.</abstract><pub>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</pub><doi>10.18778/1508-2008.26.35</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-5260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-2927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-2853</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1508-2008 |
ispartof | Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe, 2023-01, Vol.26 (4), p.141-162 |
issn | 1508-2008 2082-6737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_193051b5e5954aacad3516e8cef7a0fe |
source | ABI/INFORM Collection; Business Source Ultimate; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Government/Political systems household pan‑european personal pension product public pension schemes retirement saving for old age Welfare systems |
title | Does the Pan‑European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Pan%E2%80%91European%20Personal%20Pension%20Product%20Suit%20All?%20Its%20Perspectives%20in%20the%20EU%20Member%20and%20Candidate%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20economic%20research.%20Central%20and%20Eastern%20Europe&rft.au=Kochaniak,%20Katarzyna&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=141-162&rft.issn=1508-2008&rft.eissn=2082-6737&rft_id=info:doi/10.18778/1508-2008.26.35&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_doaj_%3E1206535%3C/ceeol_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-27097fb774e667022613d9c16ba1032f12e01fc2c80a357ad4f8fd5ccad54943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1206535&rfr_iscdi=true |