Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment

The dataset presented in this article are related to the research article entitled “Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl3 as a pre-treatment” (Ebrahimi et al., 2017) [1]. This article reports the cost estimation for treati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Data in brief 2017-12, Vol.15, p.1043-1047
Main Authors: Ebrahimi, Afshin, Mahdavi, Mokhtar, Pirsaheb, Meghdad, Alimohammadi, Fariborz, Mahvi, Amir Hossein
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coat estimation
Environmental Sciences
Spent filter backwash water
Water reuse
Water treatment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The dataset presented in this article are related to the research article entitled “Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl3 as a pre-treatment” (Ebrahimi et al., 2017) [1]. This article reports the cost estimation for treating produced spent filter backwash water (SFBW) during water treatment in Isfahan- Iran by various methods including primary sedimentation, coagulation & flocculation, second clarification, ultra filtration (UF) and recirculation of settled SFBW to water treatment plant (WTP) entrance. Coagulation conducted by PAFCl and FeCl3 as pre polymerized and traditional coagulants. Cost estimation showed that contrary to expectations, the recirculation of settled SFBW to WTP entrance is more expensive than other method and it costs about $ 37,814,817.6. Versus the cheapest option related to separate primary sedimentation, coagulation & flocculation in WTP. This option cost about $ 4,757,200 and $ 950,213 when FeCl3 and PAFCl used as coagulant, respectively.
ISSN:2352-3409
2352-3409
DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.040