Loading…

Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wing in Air Flow and Air–Solid Flow Using Three Different Meshing Techniques and Comparison with Experimental Results in Wind Tunnel

The main purpose of this work is to simulate the flow of air and solid particles over a wildfire and to investigate the single and multiphase flow over the surface of a custom-designed wing with an Eppler-420 airfoil including an appendant custom-designed blended winglet. The wing is the result of a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computation 2022-03, Vol.10 (3), p.34
Main Authors: Karkoulias, Dionysios G., Tzoganis, Evangelos D., Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G., Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D., Margaris, Dionissios P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 34
container_title Computation
container_volume 10
creator Karkoulias, Dionysios G.
Tzoganis, Evangelos D.
Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G.
Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D.
Margaris, Dionissios P.
description The main purpose of this work is to simulate the flow of air and solid particles over a wildfire and to investigate the single and multiphase flow over the surface of a custom-designed wing with an Eppler-420 airfoil including an appendant custom-designed blended winglet. The wing is the result of a conceptual and preliminary design of a small-scale unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to assist in firefighting. The fire embers will be simulated in the Ansys Fluent commercial code as solid particles injected in the continuous phase, in an Euler–Lagrange approach. Primarily studied were the response of the model in air and air–solid flows, as well as the impact on aerodynamic efficiency due to the existence of the second phase. Moreover, the effects of unstructured, structured and mosaic poly-hexcore meshes are investigated and compared. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, were implemented using a pressure-based solver, spatial discretization was conducted with a second-order upwind scheme, and the k-omega SST (k-ω SST) turbulence model was applied. Meanwhile, the two-phase flow was simulated using the Discrete Phase Model with reflect boundary condition on the surface of the wing and two-way coupling between continuous and discrete phase. To validate the results, experiments were conducted in a subsonic wind tunnel using a 3D printed model of the wing. The results show good agreement between simulations and experiments, with the structured mesh coming closer to reality, followed by the mosaic and unstructured meshes, respectively. Finally, a reduction in the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing section is observed, due to the presence of solid particles.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/computation10030034
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_19ac6a265a3342e0bdcc88b27ba60540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_19ac6a265a3342e0bdcc88b27ba60540</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2642356341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUd1qHCEUHkoKDUmeoDdCrzfR0ZnRy7D5aSAh0GzopZzxJ-syq1t1SPau79DX6FPlSeLshrYXFUHPx_dz9FTVZ4JPKRX4TIX1ZsyQXfAEY1o2-1Ad1rgTM0pEd_DP_VN1ktIKlyUI5TU-rH7P_6phQFfD6DS62HpYO5XQQx71FgWLvjv_hJxH5y4WTnhG4PVUvP789RCGItmBj2miLZbRGHThrDXR-IzuTFrucKOW3v0YTdqpp2CILgWPnl1eosuXjYluXRSlj28mjUNOU2SJ1mgxem-G4-qjhSGZk_fzqHq8ulzMv85u769v5ue3M0U5zzPOWtFZ22HWC0sx16QByhuuW9xzxgELgcH0PfCWilo3PQFrSsUAN7ahgh5VN3tfHWAlN6UriFsZwMkdEOKThJidGowkAlQLdVsSKKsN7rVSnPd110OLG4aL15e91yaG6e1ZrsIYy18nWbespk1LGSksumepGFKKxv5JJVhOU5b_mTJ9A17QoLM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642356341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wing in Air Flow and Air–Solid Flow Using Three Different Meshing Techniques and Comparison with Experimental Results in Wind Tunnel</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Karkoulias, Dionysios G. ; Tzoganis, Evangelos D. ; Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G. ; Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D. ; Margaris, Dionissios P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karkoulias, Dionysios G. ; Tzoganis, Evangelos D. ; Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G. ; Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D. ; Margaris, Dionissios P.</creatorcontrib><description>The main purpose of this work is to simulate the flow of air and solid particles over a wildfire and to investigate the single and multiphase flow over the surface of a custom-designed wing with an Eppler-420 airfoil including an appendant custom-designed blended winglet. The wing is the result of a conceptual and preliminary design of a small-scale unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to assist in firefighting. The fire embers will be simulated in the Ansys Fluent commercial code as solid particles injected in the continuous phase, in an Euler–Lagrange approach. Primarily studied were the response of the model in air and air–solid flows, as well as the impact on aerodynamic efficiency due to the existence of the second phase. Moreover, the effects of unstructured, structured and mosaic poly-hexcore meshes are investigated and compared. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, were implemented using a pressure-based solver, spatial discretization was conducted with a second-order upwind scheme, and the k-omega SST (k-ω SST) turbulence model was applied. Meanwhile, the two-phase flow was simulated using the Discrete Phase Model with reflect boundary condition on the surface of the wing and two-way coupling between continuous and discrete phase. To validate the results, experiments were conducted in a subsonic wind tunnel using a 3D printed model of the wing. The results show good agreement between simulations and experiments, with the structured mesh coming closer to reality, followed by the mosaic and unstructured meshes, respectively. Finally, a reduction in the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing section is observed, due to the presence of solid particles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-3197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-3197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/computation10030034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Aircraft ; Aviation ; blended winglet ; Boundary conditions ; CAD ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer aided design ; Customization ; Energy ; Eppler ; Finite element method ; Fire fighting ; Flow simulation ; Fluid flow ; k-omega SST ; K-omega turbulence model ; mosaic mesh ; Mosaics ; Multiphase flow ; poly-hexcore ; Preliminary designs ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Reynolds number ; Sand &amp; gravel ; Shear stress ; Simulation ; structured mesh ; Subsonic aircraft ; Subsonic wind tunnels ; Three dimensional models ; Three dimensional printing ; Turbulence models ; Two phase flow ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Computation, 2022-03, Vol.10 (3), p.34</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7381-7957 ; 0000-0003-2292-3685 ; 0000-0002-2852-6296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642356341/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642356341?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karkoulias, Dionysios G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzoganis, Evangelos D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margaris, Dionissios P.</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wing in Air Flow and Air–Solid Flow Using Three Different Meshing Techniques and Comparison with Experimental Results in Wind Tunnel</title><title>Computation</title><description>The main purpose of this work is to simulate the flow of air and solid particles over a wildfire and to investigate the single and multiphase flow over the surface of a custom-designed wing with an Eppler-420 airfoil including an appendant custom-designed blended winglet. The wing is the result of a conceptual and preliminary design of a small-scale unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to assist in firefighting. The fire embers will be simulated in the Ansys Fluent commercial code as solid particles injected in the continuous phase, in an Euler–Lagrange approach. Primarily studied were the response of the model in air and air–solid flows, as well as the impact on aerodynamic efficiency due to the existence of the second phase. Moreover, the effects of unstructured, structured and mosaic poly-hexcore meshes are investigated and compared. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, were implemented using a pressure-based solver, spatial discretization was conducted with a second-order upwind scheme, and the k-omega SST (k-ω SST) turbulence model was applied. Meanwhile, the two-phase flow was simulated using the Discrete Phase Model with reflect boundary condition on the surface of the wing and two-way coupling between continuous and discrete phase. To validate the results, experiments were conducted in a subsonic wind tunnel using a 3D printed model of the wing. The results show good agreement between simulations and experiments, with the structured mesh coming closer to reality, followed by the mosaic and unstructured meshes, respectively. Finally, a reduction in the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing section is observed, due to the presence of solid particles.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>blended winglet</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>CAD</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer aided design</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Eppler</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fire fighting</subject><subject>Flow simulation</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>k-omega SST</subject><subject>K-omega turbulence model</subject><subject>mosaic mesh</subject><subject>Mosaics</subject><subject>Multiphase flow</subject><subject>poly-hexcore</subject><subject>Preliminary designs</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Sand &amp; gravel</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>structured mesh</subject><subject>Subsonic aircraft</subject><subject>Subsonic wind tunnels</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Three dimensional printing</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Two phase flow</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>2079-3197</issn><issn>2079-3197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUd1qHCEUHkoKDUmeoDdCrzfR0ZnRy7D5aSAh0GzopZzxJ-syq1t1SPau79DX6FPlSeLshrYXFUHPx_dz9FTVZ4JPKRX4TIX1ZsyQXfAEY1o2-1Ad1rgTM0pEd_DP_VN1ktIKlyUI5TU-rH7P_6phQFfD6DS62HpYO5XQQx71FgWLvjv_hJxH5y4WTnhG4PVUvP789RCGItmBj2miLZbRGHThrDXR-IzuTFrucKOW3v0YTdqpp2CILgWPnl1eosuXjYluXRSlj28mjUNOU2SJ1mgxem-G4-qjhSGZk_fzqHq8ulzMv85u769v5ue3M0U5zzPOWtFZ22HWC0sx16QByhuuW9xzxgELgcH0PfCWilo3PQFrSsUAN7ahgh5VN3tfHWAlN6UriFsZwMkdEOKThJidGowkAlQLdVsSKKsN7rVSnPd110OLG4aL15e91yaG6e1ZrsIYy18nWbespk1LGSksumepGFKKxv5JJVhOU5b_mTJ9A17QoLM</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Karkoulias, Dionysios G.</creator><creator>Tzoganis, Evangelos D.</creator><creator>Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G.</creator><creator>Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D.</creator><creator>Margaris, Dionissios P.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-7957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-3685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-6296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wing in Air Flow and Air–Solid Flow Using Three Different Meshing Techniques and Comparison with Experimental Results in Wind Tunnel</title><author>Karkoulias, Dionysios G. ; Tzoganis, Evangelos D. ; Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G. ; Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D. ; Margaris, Dionissios P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>blended winglet</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>CAD</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer aided design</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Eppler</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fire fighting</topic><topic>Flow simulation</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>k-omega SST</topic><topic>K-omega turbulence model</topic><topic>mosaic mesh</topic><topic>Mosaics</topic><topic>Multiphase flow</topic><topic>poly-hexcore</topic><topic>Preliminary designs</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Sand &amp; gravel</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>structured mesh</topic><topic>Subsonic aircraft</topic><topic>Subsonic wind tunnels</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Three dimensional printing</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Two phase flow</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karkoulias, Dionysios G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzoganis, Evangelos D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margaris, Dionissios P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Computation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karkoulias, Dionysios G.</au><au>Tzoganis, Evangelos D.</au><au>Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios G.</au><au>Acheimastos, Spyridon-Giaroslav D.</au><au>Margaris, Dionissios P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wing in Air Flow and Air–Solid Flow Using Three Different Meshing Techniques and Comparison with Experimental Results in Wind Tunnel</atitle><jtitle>Computation</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>34</spage><pages>34-</pages><issn>2079-3197</issn><eissn>2079-3197</eissn><abstract>The main purpose of this work is to simulate the flow of air and solid particles over a wildfire and to investigate the single and multiphase flow over the surface of a custom-designed wing with an Eppler-420 airfoil including an appendant custom-designed blended winglet. The wing is the result of a conceptual and preliminary design of a small-scale unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to assist in firefighting. The fire embers will be simulated in the Ansys Fluent commercial code as solid particles injected in the continuous phase, in an Euler–Lagrange approach. Primarily studied were the response of the model in air and air–solid flows, as well as the impact on aerodynamic efficiency due to the existence of the second phase. Moreover, the effects of unstructured, structured and mosaic poly-hexcore meshes are investigated and compared. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, were implemented using a pressure-based solver, spatial discretization was conducted with a second-order upwind scheme, and the k-omega SST (k-ω SST) turbulence model was applied. Meanwhile, the two-phase flow was simulated using the Discrete Phase Model with reflect boundary condition on the surface of the wing and two-way coupling between continuous and discrete phase. To validate the results, experiments were conducted in a subsonic wind tunnel using a 3D printed model of the wing. The results show good agreement between simulations and experiments, with the structured mesh coming closer to reality, followed by the mosaic and unstructured meshes, respectively. Finally, a reduction in the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing section is observed, due to the presence of solid particles.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/computation10030034</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-7957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-3685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-6296</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-3197
ispartof Computation, 2022-03, Vol.10 (3), p.34
issn 2079-3197
2079-3197
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_19ac6a265a3342e0bdcc88b27ba60540
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Air flow
Aircraft
Aviation
blended winglet
Boundary conditions
CAD
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer aided design
Customization
Energy
Eppler
Finite element method
Fire fighting
Flow simulation
Fluid flow
k-omega SST
K-omega turbulence model
mosaic mesh
Mosaics
Multiphase flow
poly-hexcore
Preliminary designs
R&D
Research & development
Reynolds number
Sand & gravel
Shear stress
Simulation
structured mesh
Subsonic aircraft
Subsonic wind tunnels
Three dimensional models
Three dimensional printing
Turbulence models
Two phase flow
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Wildfires
title Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wing in Air Flow and Air–Solid Flow Using Three Different Meshing Techniques and Comparison with Experimental Results in Wind Tunnel
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Fluid%20Dynamics%20Study%20of%20Wing%20in%20Air%20Flow%20and%20Air%E2%80%93Solid%20Flow%20Using%20Three%20Different%20Meshing%20Techniques%20and%20Comparison%20with%20Experimental%20Results%20in%20Wind%20Tunnel&rft.jtitle=Computation&rft.au=Karkoulias,%20Dionysios%20G.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=34&rft.pages=34-&rft.issn=2079-3197&rft.eissn=2079-3197&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/computation10030034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2642356341%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-84697ff704b9f308d15a3858d60b848a0990aebba86392d5b1afeba84a05f5393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642356341&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true